Conquer Club

Hey only won because i lost 9v3, 8v3, 7v3 and 7v3, that's the only reason he won. I can handle losses but when you brag about a win because when your opponent lost due to dice, that's just pathetic.

lt.pie wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:
If I had still been your rank after 200+ games I would have given up !

But you would have had a bigger pool of players to play games against, instead of playing the same guys over and over and over again....

boorrrinng!

oh yeah, because players in public games are so skilled.

Georgerx7di wrote:

lt.pie wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:
If I had still been your rank after 200+ games I would have given up !

But you would have had a bigger pool of players to play games against, instead of playing the same guys over and over and over again....

boorrrinng!

oh yeah, because players in public games are so skilled.

lol they arent much different in speeders either

You beat a fucking Texan. I hope that means you've raised up one level of the food chain!

Not really an accomplishment. Normally they can't rub two brain cells together.

Skittles! wrote:You beat a fucking Texan. I hope that means you've raised up one level of the food chain!

Not really an accomplishment. Normally they can't rub two brain cells together.

Wow who the hell are you talking about us like that? Stereotype much?

By the way, this one is evidently smarted than you judging by rank.

man they all like to mock the murph, skilled player, would kill most of you on a good day, end of.

jammyjames wrote:man they all like to mock the murph, skilled player, would kill most of you on a good day, end of.

Thank you for a little bit of support finally. Your a good man James.

murphy16 wrote:

jammyjames wrote:man they all like to mock the murph, skilled player, would kill most of you on a good day, end of.

Thank you for a little bit of support finally. Your a good man James.

Dude I made an entire thread in support of you! wtf.

demonfork wrote:

murphy16 wrote:

jammyjames wrote:man they all like to mock the murph, skilled player, would kill most of you on a good day, end of.

Thank you for a little bit of support finally. Your a good man James.

Dude I made an entire thread in support of you! wtf.

Really, well then tank you mate, I guess I never ran across it.
You know I can't ever get mad at you.

geez murph, you're getting more popular by the minute. Next thing you know they will rename the site after you....

AgentSmith88 wrote:geez murph, you're getting more popular by the minute. Next thing you know they will rename the site after you....

Tell me about it.

murphy16 wrote:

Skittles! wrote:You beat a fucking Texan. I hope that means you've raised up one level of the food chain!

Not really an accomplishment. Normally they can't rub two brain cells together.

Wow who the hell are you talking about us like that? Stereotype much?

By the way, this one is evidently smarted than you judging by rank.

Hang on, look at this blatant use of bigotry! Mods!

lt.pie wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:
If I had still been your rank after 200+ games I would have given up !

But you would have had a bigger pool of players to play games against, instead of playing the same guys over and over and over again....

boorrrinng!

Way off the mark Pie , its the quality of the games that are key not the opposition mate , no fun playing 100 different guys if they all screw up the game

Skittles! wrote:

murphy16 wrote:

Skittles! wrote:You beat a fucking Texan. I hope that means you've raised up one level of the food chain!

Not really an accomplishment. Normally they can't rub two brain cells together.

Wow who the hell are you talking about us like that? Stereotype much?

By the way, this one is evidently smarted than you judging by rank.

Hang on, look at this blatant use of bigotry! Mods!

Hey you brought it upon yourself by making a stupid remark about us Texans.

Georgerx7di wrote:

lt.pie wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:
If I had still been your rank after 200+ games I would have given up !

But you would have had a bigger pool of players to play games against, instead of playing the same guys over and over and over again....

boorrrinng!

oh yeah, because players in public games are so skilled.

OI! whats that supposed to mean?!

daydream wrote:

Georgerx7di wrote:

lt.pie wrote:

joecoolfrog wrote:
If I had still been your rank after 200+ games I would have given up !

But you would have had a bigger pool of players to play games against, instead of playing the same guys over and over and over again....

boorrrinng!

oh yeah, because players in public games are so skilled.

OI! whats that supposed to mean?!

Are you serious. Ok, I will respond to this.

So recently I started playing terminator games, just to get the medal. Now in a 6 players games your odds of winning are 16.7%. In standard games my win percentage has usually been in the low 20's for 6 player games because I played mostly private games against much better players. In terminator, recently I had it as high as 44% for 6 players games, because I was playing public games. Until I started joining private higher ranked terminator games. Now with 6 players in the game my win percentage has dropped to 34%. This is just one game type that makes a good example because I had played a lot of public games. Btw, these were all Sequential games.

So what's my point. Even in singles games with sequential settings and any style of play, playing public games is basically farming. The vast majority who join these games are sergeants, and they are not very good. If you're playing for medals (as I am), its convenient because you get a lot of easy wins against different people. However, if you are playing for a challenge, then private games in which you invite players whom you know to be good, are the only way to have a good game.

yo, i beat him too.