Conquer Club

23.

LFAW wrote:23.

Strangely, just a touch larger than than my penis in inches.

Btw..LFAW's got nothing on me.

i have 49 currently on my foe list.

i have erased it twice. but i am not sure if i will ever erase it again.

if someone has me on foe, i foe them. i also foe for stupid reasons too.

Per CC Policy, Admins have zero people on our Foe Lists. However, even if it wasn't the policy, I don't think I've come across any users that I would feel the need to put on my list.


--Andy

AndyDufresne wrote:Per CC Policy, Admins have zero people on our Foe Lists. However, even if it wasn't the policy, I don't think I've come across any users that I would feel the need to put on my list.


--Andy

come on andy. speak the truth. flame someone. i know you wouldnt want to play a game with me. dont lie

We've already played 2 games together---albeit sometime ago!


--Andy

AndyDufresne wrote:We've already played 2 games together---albeit sometime ago!


--Andy

I wanted to foe you for missing turns in that tournament <_<

obliterationX wrote:

Timminz wrote:It's not the size of your foe list that matters. It's how you use it.

I fully agree.

What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?

It's better to get beat down by better players and at least learn from them then put them on your foe list you pansy. Playing cooks in team games is also an inefficient and limited way of gaining points. Freestyle is better for that.

How many foe lists of others are you on? I'd guess about 30 people have me foed. Two who have posted in this thread already.

prismsaber wrote:

obliterationX wrote:

Timminz wrote:It's not the size of your foe list that matters. It's how you use it.

I fully agree.

What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?

It's better to get beat down by better players and at least learn from them then put them on your foe list you pansy. Playing cooks in team games is also an inefficient and limited way of gaining points. Freestyle is better for that.

It's much better to play team games against said players than to constantly play high-ranked players (of whom I already have the unique defeats), to get medals.

Don't assume I'm trying to avoid them because of fear - it's just wasted time to play the same high-rankers more than once!

obliterationX wrote:

prismsaber wrote:

obliterationX wrote:

Timminz wrote:It's not the size of your foe list that matters. It's how you use it.

I fully agree.

What better way to utilize a perfectly legal site feature than to use it to help you rank up!?

It's better to get beat down by better players and at least learn from them then put them on your foe list you pansy. Playing cooks in team games is also an inefficient and limited way of gaining points. Freestyle is better for that.

It's much better to play team games against said players than to constantly play high-ranked players (of whom I already have the unique defeats), to get medals.

Don't assume I'm trying to avoid them - it's just wasted time to play the same high-rankers more than once!

You foed me and you don't have a unique for me so there goes that theory. I was cruising around the public team games waiting for opponents looking for the biggest high ranking noobs I could find and so naturally I tried to join one of your games but sadly I was already foed .

Beckytheblondie wrote:How many foe lists of others are you on? I'd guess about 30 people have me foed. Two who have posted in this thread already.

I've got something like 60 <_<

i know of 7 people....All but one of these is because of me beating them.

Beckytheblondie wrote:How many foe lists of others are you on?

1, that I know of, but I don't think anyone counts KLOBBER anymore.

If there is anyone else who has me foe'd, feel free to let me know.

Zero

but I am getting on quite a few after trying out single player games. It seems it is fairly standard to foe people that beat you or join your two player games more than once.

I don't think I have gotten foed after loosing to someone though, which happens a lot

herndawg wrote:I don't think I have gotten foed after loosing to someone though, which happens a lot

That is 100% true. For me, that's more than a legitimate excuse to utilize this site feature.

Why waste time playing the same people that you've already beaten if you're going for medals?

I'm started to get annoyed by massive people joining all my games - I want medals you bastards, go away.

Kotaro wrote:I'm started to get annoyed by massive people joining all my games - I want medals you bastards, go away.

i agree with this wholeheartedly.

it is cc etiquette to not join more than 2 games with the map or settings with the same person at one time.

seriously people.

herndawg wrote:Zero

but I am getting on quite a few after trying out single player games. It seems it is fairly standard to foe people that beat you or join your two player games more than once.

I don't think I have gotten foed after loosing to someone though, which happens a lot

DONT JOIN 4 GAMES OF SOMEONES. only join one.

obliterationX wrote:

herndawg wrote:I don't think I have gotten foed after loosing to someone though, which happens a lot

That is 100% true. For me, that's more than a legitimate excuse to utilize this site feature.

Why waste time playing the same people that you've already beaten if you're going for medals?

i erased all of my foes after i got all of my medals. i was up to a couple hundred foed people.

i bet i am on at least 75 peoples foe lists, and that is down from last year.

ronc8649 wrote:

obliterationX wrote:

herndawg wrote:I don't think I have gotten foed after loosing to someone though, which happens a lot

That is 100% true. For me, that's more than a legitimate excuse to utilize this site feature.

Why waste time playing the same people that you've already beaten if you're going for medals?

i erased all of my foes after i got all of my medals. i was up to a couple hundred foed people.

i bet i am on at least 75 peoples foe lists, and that is down from last year.

At one point you had me foed... Forgot why... anyhow... I have less than 10 people on my list. For various reasons.

P.S. to those medal hunting most of you are playing enough games not to need to foe people. You will get your UD's in time, just not as quick as if you foe people. So what if you get Gold quads this week or 4 weeks from now.

Bruceswar wrote:

ronc8649 wrote:

obliterationX wrote:

herndawg wrote:I don't think I have gotten foed after loosing to someone though, which happens a lot

That is 100% true. For me, that's more than a legitimate excuse to utilize this site feature.

Why waste time playing the same people that you've already beaten if you're going for medals?

i erased all of my foes after i got all of my medals. i was up to a couple hundred foed people.

i bet i am on at least 75 peoples foe lists, and that is down from last year.

At one point you had me foed... Forgot why... anyhow... I have less than 10 people on my list. For various reasons.

P.S. to those medal hunting most of you are playing enough games not to need to foe people. You will get your UD's in time, just not as quick as if you foe people. So what if you get Gold quads this week or 4 weeks from now.

The fact that premium membership expires tends to play a role.

109 people on mine...


-tig

As per all threads about foe lists, I have just foe'd everyone who has posted in this thread.

Timminz wrote:As per all threads about foe lists, I have just foe'd everyone who has posted in this thread.