Page 11 of 11

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:24 pm
by muy_thaiguy
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times


Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many


Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless. :D
I believe that is better. And more factual.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:35 pm
by Napoleon Ier
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times


Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many


Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless. :D
I believe that is better. And more factual.


I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:39 pm
by muy_thaiguy
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times


Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many


Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless. :D
I believe that is better. And more factual.


I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:42 pm
by Frigidus
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times


Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many


Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless. :D
I believe that is better. And more factual.


I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.


Agreed, I still get a chill every time I see xtra's name as the author...

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 12:42 pm
by Napoleon Ier
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times


Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many


Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless. :D
I believe that is better. And more factual.


I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.


True. Jay ought, and I am giving friendly advice, debate about american politics and not bring in conspiracy theories. It discredits the sensible points that you make about Ron Paul and makes it too easy for the insecure debaters to use your beliefs against you out of context,

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:08 pm
by Frigidus
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times


Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many


Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless. :D
I believe that is better. And more factual.


I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.


True. Jay ought, and I am giving friendly advice, debate about american politics and not bring in conspiracy theories. It discredits the sensible points that you make about Ron Paul and makes it too easy for the insecure debaters to use your beliefs against you out of context,


Of course to be fair DaGip bumped this one, but hey, the idea still applies.

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 2:37 pm
by Dancing Mustard
Is it really unfair to keep raising Jay's bizzare conspiracy theories in threads about politics?

Jay's willingness to believe ridiculous conspiracy theories, even in the weight of overwhelming evidence to debunk them = demonstrative of his propensity to reach, and cling to, irrational stupid points of view.

Jay preaching about a ridiculous candidate, even in the weight of overwhelming evidence to show the man is an unelectable sidewhow = Jay demonstrating his propensity to reach, and cling to, irrational stupid points of view.

Looks to me like his behaivour in the first type of thread is 100% relevant to his behaivour in the second, and can quite legitimately be used to attack his credibility therein. But hey, maybe that's just me...

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:27 pm
by Backglass
Are we back to this again?

How many times must we throw logic and fact in the face of these wacko theorists?

Jay...give it up. We were attacked, and not by our own countrymen. You really need to stop sniffing the dust in those old bibles of yours...I think it might be lead paint. :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 12:41 am
by DaGip
Frigidus wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
muy_thaiguy wrote:
jay_a2j wrote:Number of times the "911 Conspiracy Theory" has been debunked = Countless, countless times


Number of conspiricists that won't listen to reason in the US = Well, 1 is to damn many


Realizing that if the government was actually like that, then why aren't they dead as well, and realizing that you've been making an ass of yourself = Priceless. :D
I believe that is better. And more factual.


I think we ought to give him a break...dissproving these ludicrous theories over and over and then using them against him when he does make a good point about politics is just pompous intellectual arrogance.
Well, reviving these old threads kind of annoyed me a bit, because then they get out of hand with these threads.


True. Jay ought, and I am giving friendly advice, debate about american politics and not bring in conspiracy theories. It discredits the sensible points that you make about Ron Paul and makes it too easy for the insecure debaters to use your beliefs against you out of context,


Of course to be fair DaGip bumped this one, but hey, the idea still applies.


I bumped some of these old threads because someone posted a 9-11 conspiracy thread, that way for those who wanted to actually debate this issue, they would have a little past info to work on...only reason why I bumped this thread. To bad xtra can't be here :cry:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:50 am
by unriggable
The bastard wouldn't shut up. He deserved it.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:35 am
by Guiscard
DaGip wrote:I bumped some of these old threads because someone posted a 9-11 conspiracy thread, that way for those who wanted to actually debate this issue, they would have a little past info to work on...only reason why I bumped this thread. To bad xtra can't be here :cry:


You're debating the issue? f*ck me... Its not a definition of debate I've ever heard!

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:10 am
by Frigidus
Once again I find myself linking to Maddox.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

Sums up Loose Change.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2008 9:22 am
by heavycola
Frigidus wrote:Once again I find myself linking to Maddox.

http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=af07

Sums up Loose Change.


:lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2008 3:15 pm
by Dekloren
9/11 was an inside job!!

Posted: Wed Mar 12, 2008 7:24 pm
by Backglass
Dekloren wrote:9/11 was an inside job!!


9/11 was an attack!!

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:32 pm
by Dekloren
An attack on liberty and freedom!

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 8:37 pm
by suggs
Yes. Yes it was dekloren.
And now its time for the pretty BLUE pill.

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:57 am
by Backglass
Dekloren wrote:An attack on liberty and freedom!


:roll:
Image

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 12:49 pm
by reminisco
suggs wrote:Yes. Yes it was dekloren.
And now its time for the pretty BLUE pill.


yes, they've upped his dose of Valium to the BLUE pill instead of the orange. good idea.

Posted: Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:44 pm
by heavycola
reminisco wrote:
suggs wrote:Yes. Yes it was dekloren.
And now its time for the pretty BLUE pill.


yes, they've upped his dose of Valium to the BLUE pill instead of the orange. good idea.


who the hell are they?

Image