Conquer Club

You can trust me guys.

What does/did the Serial Killer do? Decide on someone to kill every night?

InkL0sed wrote:What does/did the Serial Killer do? Decide on someone to kill every night?

Yep. It was the most fun role i have had yet.

jecko7 wrote:We do need a lynch. Although, with the serial killer gone, now there's hopefully only going to be 1 kill per night. So, the vigilante has to withhold their kill tonight, or they'll be 2 kills, and if they miss this time then we're down to 6 (and if Kalishnikov's guess of 3 or 4 scum is correct, we're sunk).

Speaking of Kalishnikov, how do you suppose that there are 4 scum? There's 8 alive, wouldn't it take 5 to lynch, making it impossible to lynch if there were 4? There's definitetly under 3 scum.

Just a guess, but I should have prefaced my comment with the fact that I've been right about ZERO times when taking a shot at the number of scum, I always estimate high. The way people answer/respond to questions are sometimes more important then the answer to the question being asked.

kalishnikov wrote:

jecko7 wrote:We do need a lynch. Although, with the serial killer gone, now there's hopefully only going to be 1 kill per night. So, the vigilante has to withhold their kill tonight, or they'll be 2 kills, and if they miss this time then we're down to 6 (and if Kalishnikov's guess of 3 or 4 scum is correct, we're sunk).

Speaking of Kalishnikov, how do you suppose that there are 4 scum? There's 8 alive, wouldn't it take 5 to lynch, making it impossible to lynch if there were 4? There's definitetly under 3 scum.

Just a guess, but I should have prefaced my comment with the fact that I've been right about ZERO times when taking a shot at the number of scum, I always estimate high. The way people answer/respond to questions are sometimes more important then the answer to the question being asked.

Sshhh, you're not supposed to let on when you're setting a trap, it kind of defeats the whole object. Now no one will want to remark on your comments, for fear of being analysed!

On another note, I notice that all the people who were quite happy to jump on the Darth bandwagon, have suddenly gone very quiet on the voting front. What's up, not quite as an attractive prospect voting for one of your fellow scum buddies, eh?

Vote Count

Jecko: 1 (Tripitaka)

8 alive, 5 to lynch. Deadline another day or two away.

By the way: life is getting pretty hectic again these days, so I don't know how much time I'll have to offer vote counts and so on. I'll do my best to do my share, but I may miss a (calendar) day here and there.

I think either Jecko or Tripitaka are scum.

Tripitaka wrote:

kalishnikov wrote:

jecko7 wrote:We do need a lynch. Although, with the serial killer gone, now there's hopefully only going to be 1 kill per night. So, the vigilante has to withhold their kill tonight, or they'll be 2 kills, and if they miss this time then we're down to 6 (and if Kalishnikov's guess of 3 or 4 scum is correct, we're sunk).

Speaking of Kalishnikov, how do you suppose that there are 4 scum? There's 8 alive, wouldn't it take 5 to lynch, making it impossible to lynch if there were 4? There's definitetly under 3 scum.

Just a guess, but I should have prefaced my comment with the fact that I've been right about ZERO times when taking a shot at the number of scum, I always estimate high. The way people answer/respond to questions are sometimes more important then the answer to the question being asked.

Sshhh, you're not supposed to let on when you're setting a trap, it kind of defeats the whole object. Now no one will want to remark on your comments, for fear of being analysed!

On another note, I notice that all the people who were quite happy to jump on the Darth bandwagon, have suddenly gone very quiet on the voting front. What's up, not quite as an attractive prospect voting for one of your fellow scum buddies, eh?

Who's setting a trap? Who are you people? What the hell is this game? Would you like to come cuddle my cat?

InkL0sed wrote:I think either Jecko or Tripitaka are scum.

Can I ask why? You might be right but that doesn't do us any good unless you give us a reason or two, then perhaps we can do something about it.

Well Jecko seems pretty zealous in lynching people, and Tripitaka seemed like (s)he might have been trying to make him/her self seem innocent by this post:

Tripitaka wrote:

kalishnikov wrote:

jecko7 wrote:We do need a lynch. Although, with the serial killer gone, now there's hopefully only going to be 1 kill per night. So, the vigilante has to withhold their kill tonight, or they'll be 2 kills, and if they miss this time then we're down to 6 (and if Kalishnikov's guess of 3 or 4 scum is correct, we're sunk).

Speaking of Kalishnikov, how do you suppose that there are 4 scum? There's 8 alive, wouldn't it take 5 to lynch, making it impossible to lynch if there were 4? There's definitetly under 3 scum.

Just a guess, but I should have prefaced my comment with the fact that I've been right about ZERO times when taking a shot at the number of scum, I always estimate high. The way people answer/respond to questions are sometimes more important then the answer to the question being asked.

Sshhh, you're not supposed to let on when you're setting a trap, it kind of defeats the whole object. Now no one will want to remark on your comments, for fear of being analysed! Laughing

On another note, I notice that all the people who were quite happy to jump on the Darth bandwagon, have suddenly gone very quiet on the voting front. What's up, not quite as an attractive prospect voting for one of your fellow scum buddies, eh?

I was "zealous" in lynching people when we had more people on our side, and where we could get clues by lynching people. That was before we learned that there were 2 killers at night - possibly 3, if there's a vigilante as well.

Now we're down 6 people, and I'm a little more weary, but I still believe that the best course of action is a lynch. If there are 2 more kills tonight, and the vig hits a town, then we're down to 6 people (5 with a lynch).

Which, if Kalishnikov is right, then we're done. The town will be half scum. Of course, if he's lying/wrong, we still have some time.

jecko7 wrote:I was "zealous" in lynching people when we had more people on our side, and where we could get clues by lynching people. That was before we learned that there were 2 killers at night - possibly 3, if there's a vigilante as well.

Now we're down 6 people, and I'm a little more weary, but I still believe that the best course of action is a lynch. If there are 2 more kills tonight, and the vig hits a town, then we're down to 6 people (5 with a lynch).

Which, if Kalishnikov is right, then we're done. The town will be half scum. Of course, if he's lying/wrong, we still have some time.

Nothing to say about Trip?

InkL0sed wrote:

jecko7 wrote:I was "zealous" in lynching people when we had more people on our side, and where we could get clues by lynching people. That was before we learned that there were 2 killers at night - possibly 3, if there's a vigilante as well.

Now we're down 6 people, and I'm a little more weary, but I still believe that the best course of action is a lynch. If there are 2 more kills tonight, and the vig hits a town, then we're down to 6 people (5 with a lynch).

Which, if Kalishnikov is right, then we're done. The town will be half scum. Of course, if he's lying/wrong, we still have some time.

Nothing to say about Trip?

What do you want me to say? Despite the fact that he/she thinks I'm scum, I haven't really drawn any conclusions. Maybe he/she's trying to get a lynch on me to divert attention away from him/herself? I don't know, I'm not going to point fingers with such a small margin of error. Then again, if everyone else wants to lynch him/her, I'll cast a vote just to get a lynch, our odds of hitting scum are getting higher and higher...

jecko7 wrote:

InkL0sed wrote:

jecko7 wrote:I was "zealous" in lynching people when we had more people on our side, and where we could get clues by lynching people. That was before we learned that there were 2 killers at night - possibly 3, if there's a vigilante as well.

Now we're down 6 people, and I'm a little more weary, but I still believe that the best course of action is a lynch. If there are 2 more kills tonight, and the vig hits a town, then we're down to 6 people (5 with a lynch).

Which, if Kalishnikov is right, then we're done. The town will be half scum. Of course, if he's lying/wrong, we still have some time.

Nothing to say about Trip?

What do you want me to say? Despite the fact that he/she thinks I'm scum, I haven't really drawn any conclusions. Maybe he/she's trying to get a lynch on me to divert attention away from him/herself? I don't know, I'm not going to point fingers with such a small margin of error. Then again, if everyone else wants to lynch him/her, I'll cast a vote just to get a lynch, our odds of hitting scum are getting higher and higher...

Firstly I am a SHE - I did think the ever so pink avatar would give it away, but obviously not...anyhoo, as far as I am aware there hasn't been any attention on me to divert in the first place. I voted for you Jecko, because of the part you have played in the last two lynches and just a general feeling I get about you. I don't want to end up with a scenario like Day One again where someone is forced to claim and then because of a fast approaching deadline there is no time to pursue other avenues if the general consensus is they are town, or likewise have a sudden bandwagon out of nowhere and then someone get hammered without even claiming, but if people don't start participating and subsequently voting, then that is what will happen - or else we'll have a no lynch - which would work out very nicely for the scum I'm sure- which is again, why I am suspicious of the sudden disinterest in voting from some people, who previously have been quick to point the finger with seemingly little or no reasoning behind their decision, yourself included Ink.

I'm going to VOTE ga7 for reasons I said earlier. I see what you mean about Jecko, Triptika and there's a definite FOS there, but maybe he's just too obvious - I dunno...
Then again I see the point about Triptika seeming almost to innocent and possibly trying to divert attention away from herself.
Would like to hear some more from Militant also..

I have just re read thr thread from the begining of day three, i am a little suspicious of trip, i agree with Ink, that she has been trying to divert attention from herself,. Consequently Vote Tripitaka

Vote Count

Jecko: 1 (Tripitaka)
ga7]: 1 (Mandyb)
Tripitaka: 1 (Militant)

8 alive, 5 to lynch. Deadline Monday night 8 PM EST (GMT-5).

So the deadline for gmt is 3 pm.

No, 1 AM Tuesday morning GMT. It's five hours earlier in Canada than in the UK.

Edit: this part of Canada, anyway.

vote trip

i think today you are our best lynch....you have been trying to divert attn from yourself alot, as militant said.
and right now there is really no one else who is a better lynch.

Vote Tripitka

I think that the others here have made valid points. And, as of right now, there's no one else that striked me as particularly scummy.

Vote Count

Jecko: 1 (Tripitaka)
ga7: 1 (Mandyb)
Tripitaka: 3 (Militant, Lord Voldemort, Jecko)

8 alive, 5 to lynch. Deadline Monday night 8 PM EST (GMT-5).

Well, even though I favor jecko more, I still do suspect Tripitaka. Since she seems to be becoming popular for a lynch, vote Tripitaka

Oops, vote Tripitaka

Hmm, well I'm not entirely convinced at the moment, I'll wait for her to say something before deciding on a vote or not.