Conquer Club

Sven Hassel wrote:cairnsw there is a spelling mistake in the xml, instead of Little Sicily is spells Little Scicily.

I also saw that... But I wasn't sure because i'm kinda tired .

Unit_2 wrote:

Sven Hassel wrote:cairnsw there is a spelling mistake in the xml, instead of Little Sicily is spells Little Scicily.

I also saw that... But I wasn't sure because i'm kinda tired .

i'll check it out guys.

I just played this map with Cairnswk and others. A good map from my point of view, a little confusing the way it should be and good bonuses. I like it ^^

I just started my first game on this map. It's a 1v1. My first bonus was 5 armies, and my opponent's was 12. I'm pretty sure that makes it over from the beginning.

L

laci_mae wrote:I just started my first game on this map. It's a 1v1. My first bonus was 5 armies, and my opponent's was 12. I'm pretty sure that makes it over from the beginning.

L

Sorry to hear about your rotten start L_M...but that also happened a lot in PH.

Small typo I just noticed: XML says Little Scicily instead of Little Sicily.

Isn't this Little "Scicily" issue going to be fixed?

cairnswk wrote:Gentlemen
The spelling issue with Little Scicily change to Little Sicily is fixed in the xml link below.
Lackattack, could you upload this please.
http://h1.ripway.com/cairnswk/chicago_300508.xml
Thanks

Should be fixed guys.

I really enjoy playing Prohibition Chicago.. but its one insane thing going on..

10x 1v1 games IN A ROW my opponent has started with at least 1 bonus.

It happens all the time.. is there anything that can be done to fix this?

Thanks

White Moose wrote:I really enjoy playing Prohibition Chicago.. but its one insane thing going on..

10x 1v1 games IN A ROW my opponent has started with at least 1 bonus.

It happens all the time.. is there anything that can be done to fix this?

Thanks

Same thing can happen with Pearl Harbor. It's luck of the draw.

Maybe can,but you put these question in wrong place.

Ill just get this merged into the right palce

[MERGED]

Gilligan wrote:

White Moose wrote:I really enjoy playing Prohibition Chicago.. but its one insane thing going on..

10x 1v1 games IN A ROW my opponent has started with at least 1 bonus.

It happens all the time.. is there anything that can be done to fix this?

Thanks

Same thing can happen with Pearl Harbor. It's luck of the draw.

Yeah, Pearl Harbor is purely luck based in 1v1.

its a easy fix on this problem..just let one of the areas on the easy to get continent be netrual. some area each time started is neatrul. 1 less random place to get an army but still...thats nothing.

Androidz wrote:its a easy fix on this problem..just let one of the areas on the easy to get continent be netrual. some area each time started is neatrul. 1 less random place to get an army but still...thats nothing.

do u know how chicago works...
and i agree with moose...1v1 its tough in seq cause of the drop..i love the map for team games...but yer

lord voldemort wrote:

Androidz wrote:its a easy fix on this problem..just let one of the areas on the easy to get continent be netrual. some area each time started is neatrul. 1 less random place to get an army but still...thats nothing.

do u know how chicago works...
and i agree with moose...1v1 its tough in seq cause of the drop..i love the map for team games...but yer

No but i tought it worked like a normal map: it didint look like a conquest or anything

Androidz wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:

Androidz wrote:its a easy fix on this problem..just let one of the areas on the easy to get continent be netrual. some area each time started is neatrul. 1 less random place to get an army but still...thats nothing.

do u know how chicago works...
and i agree with moose...1v1 its tough in seq cause of the drop..i love the map for team games...but yer

No but i tought it worked like a normal map: it didint look like a conquest or anything

All is really not fair in love and war is it?
Don't you think that life is hard enough and that any sort of gift that lady luck brings either you or your opponent in a 1 vs 1 game, should be considered as a challenge when its against you and a gift when you're on the receiving end?

Just wanted to point out that 'Saltis Organisation' is spelled wrong. The 'S' in 'Organisation' should be a 'Z'

Gilligan wrote:Just wanted to point out that 'Saltis Organisation' is spelled wrong. The 'S' in 'Organisation' should be a 'Z'

No Gilligan, it's not spelt wrong. This is once again another of those words that is correct when it is spelt either way. I believe the original English version was "s" but the Americans "z"ed it.
Look here, you'll see that both are acceptable.

cairnswk wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Just wanted to point out that 'Saltis Organisation' is spelled wrong. The 'S' in 'Organisation' should be a 'Z'

No Gilligan, it's not spelt wrong. This is once again another of those words that is correct when it is spelt either way. I believe the original English version was "s" but the Americans "z"ed it.
Look here, you'll see that both are acceptable.

Sorry

Gilligan wrote:

cairnswk wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Just wanted to point out that 'Saltis Organisation' is spelled wrong. The 'S' in 'Organisation' should be a 'Z'

No Gilligan, it's not spelt wrong. This is once again another of those words that is correct when it is spelt either way. I believe the original English version was "s" but the Americans "z"ed it.
Look here, you'll see that both are acceptable.

Sorry

Don't be sorry. no harm done. It's all good when you learn

Gilligan wrote:

cairnswk wrote:

Gilligan wrote:Just wanted to point out that 'Saltis Organisation' is spelled wrong. The 'S' in 'Organisation' should be a 'Z'

No Gilligan, it's not spelt wrong. This is once again another of those words that is correct when it is spelt either way. I believe the original English version was "s" but the Americans "z"ed it.
Look here, you'll see that both are acceptable.

Sorry

Though if this is Chicago, shouldn't the American spelling be used? Meh, not worth fixing or anything.

Learn something new every day

cairnswk wrote:This is once again another of those words that is correct when it is spelt either way. I believe the original English version was "s" but the Americans "z"ed it.

No, the french "s"ed it the English originally used "z" see wikipedia

max is gr8 wrote:

cairnswk wrote:This is once again another of those words that is correct when it is spelt either way. I believe the original English version was "s" but the Americans "z"ed it.

No, the french "s"ed it the English originally used "z" see wikipedia

Woops, i'll have to stand corrected on that one. We all learned in this example.