Conquer Club

Oh, and I almost never lose 1 3x1 alone.

They come in trios or quads, every time.

somebody calculate the fuckin odds for this shit plz, thnx

http://img10.imageshack.us/my.php?image=666666bn3.png

nikola_milicki wrote:somebody calculate the fuckin odds for this shit plz, thnx

http://img10.imageshack.us/my.php?image=666666bn3.png

that just proves CC dice are NOT random WTG niko....I challenge anyone to try to roll 2 6's 3 times in a row in real life, CC needs another dice throwing program thats all

The problem is not about whether they are random. They cannot be random. The results are taken from an effing logfile! How can they be random????

The problem is in the delivery.

Megadeth666 wrote:

nikola_milicki wrote:somebody calculate the fuckin odds for this shit plz, thnx

http://img10.imageshack.us/my.php?image=666666bn3.png

that just proves CC dice are NOT random WTG niko....I challenge anyone to try to roll 2 6's 3 times in a row in real life, CC needs another dice throwing program thats all

I challenge you roll two dice 1 million times and NOT come up with 3 pairs of 6's in a row dozens and dozens of times. It's only about a 1/46,000 chance to happen. That is not a rare occurrence with all things considered on this site.

Stop and think before you speak.

Bones2484 wrote: That is not a rare occurrence with all things considered on this site.

Thank You Bones it is not rare, cause it happens all the time

Nikola, the exact same thing happened to me within just the past week. Thank you for offering pictoral proof of this.

Oh, and someone here suggested that we visit Random.org to see things for ourselves. Well, I did, and rolled 3d6 seven times just for fun. On five of the six rerolls (rolls #2 through #7) the exact same number showed up on the exact same die. I'd contend that you could never duplicate that in real life. Oh, I'm sure that if you took three dice, all different colours, that you might get that once, maybe twice, maybe three times on the outside chance - but not five out of six times.

lol I almost said "glad to be of service" only good thing about this is that this happened in a game I cant lose

I just felt I needed to share that with everybody, not going to waste my time chating here cuz we all know its useless, nothing will ever be done with dice here no mather how much we bitch about it, so keep on rollin baby...
now back to my games hoping this shit dice week will finnaly end today, cheers guys

nikola_milicki wrote: not going to waste my time chating here cuz we all know its useless, nothing will ever be done with dice here no matter how much we bitch about it

EXACTLY BUT WE ALL CAN PROVE IT IS FU.CKED UP, BUT LACK DON'T CARE
Mo Money, Mo Money...just like the multi's he allows to join all the time, mo members mo money..lol ....yup no bitching just keep rolling the bogus dies

Megadeth666 wrote:

nikola_milicki wrote: not going to waste my time chating here cuz we all know its useless, nothing will ever be done with dice here no matter how much we bitch about it

EXACTLY BUT WE ALL CAN PROVE IT IS FU.CKED UP, BUT LACK DON'T CARE
Mo Money, Mo Money...just like the multi's he allows to join all the time, mo members mo money..lol ....yup no bitching just keep rolling the bogus dies

Uh, I recall proving that they are't rigged

I have yet to see counter-proof

nikola_milicki wrote:somebody calculate the fuckin odds for this shit plz, thnx

http://img10.imageshack.us/my.php?image=666666bn3.png

show me any so called random dice throwing site that allows 2 6's rolled 3 times in a row?

Megadeth666 wrote:

nikola_milicki wrote:somebody calculate the fuckin odds for this shit plz, thnx

http://img10.imageshack.us/my.php?image=666666bn3.png

show me any so called random dice throwing site that allows 2 6's rolled 3 times in a row?

http://www.random.org/

Now, show me any so called random dice throwing site that re-rolls as soon as a third occurence of double sixes comes up

The dice here are plenty random, trust me I've played games in real life where there has been 3 6's rolled like 5 times in one game by one person, maybe not in a row, but still highly unlikely. I've also seen 2 armies kill 12, 4 guys defend against 10 and have 2 left, I could go on. Hell, I've had a game where I came out 50+ armies ahead of where I should have been These were all different games with differnet dice and people. The dice here are just as random, which can be very frustrating to a lot of people, but they are.

Megadeth666 wrote:

nikola_milicki wrote:somebody calculate the fuckin odds for this shit plz, thnx

http://img10.imageshack.us/my.php?image=666666bn3.png

show me any so called random dice throwing site that allows 2 6's rolled 3 times in a row?

"random" and "allow" do not belong in the same sentence.

Multiple merges collecting several older dice complaint threads into this one beautiful place.
This "'all new' intensity cubes complaints (merged)" thread originally began with a post by eliteslayer7. Posts now appearing before that one are as a result of the merges done by me today.

Cicero

dice

rollercoaster wheeeeee!!!

12 vs 3

I lose 11 and my opponents 3 remain intact.

The dice are just fine....

I have run into random number issues with mt_rand as well, my situation differed but,

Are you letting the mt_rand seed automatically or using mt_srand to seed the generator?

Rather than using the default seeder, I would suggest using mt_srand and a value that will be different each refresh, like total number of armies plus time or something
(I had issues just using time as the seed, I think this is what the default seeder uses)

mt_srand($player1_total_armies + $player2_total_armies + microtime (TRUE));

Mahks wrote:I have run into random number issues with mt_rand as well, my situation differed but,

Are you letting the mt_rand seed automatically or using mt_srand to seed the generator?

Rather than using the default seeder, I would suggest using mt_srand and a value that will be different each refresh, like total number of armies plus time or something
(I had issues just using time as the seed, I think this is what the default seeder uses)

mt_srand($player1_total_armies + $player2_total_armies + microtime (TRUE));

Maybe you should spend a bit more time researching before commenting.

www.random.org

Timminz: Could you be generous and tell me where I went wrong?

Mahks wrote:Timminz: Could you be generous and tell me where I went wrong?

The site takes random numbers from random.org. This website generates random numbers based on static in the air.

I'm new to this game, and it seemed rather fun at first.

But it continuously occurs that I lose a lot of troops, that my opponent takes out 2 of my troops, while he doesn't lose any. Somehow, he keeps having better numbers.
I admit that some randomness is needed to keep the game balanced and with some surprise, but this sometimes becomes plain ridiculous.
I mean, how is it possible to go from 11-5 to 5-4? Or from 4-1, to 1-1?
I really think the system should be changed or reviewed, cause I'm getting tired of losing this way, even though I have stronger armies.
For example, in My game 4317522, I've already lost 8 troops, and killed none, while trying to take Bulgaria!

Third game in a row I lose because I cannot get a 3x1 without losing at least twice first.

At least I am on the right site. Only in the true Conquer Club you can have numbers like that and still have people saying the dice are perfect.

Dice may be. The intensity cubes, however....

Spartacus wrote:I am playing 6 games simultaneously and am extremely skeptical right now about the randomness of the die rolls!!!

3 times in a row, I attecked territorries which were occupied by 1 army with a minimum of 7 and in each case lost the battle!!!

I believe the actual odds of this ever happening are over 7 million to 1!!!

you people need to fine tune the randomness of the dice, cause after thsi happening I am not to sure we have a quality product here, this has completely changed my view!!!

FIX IT !!!

IT AIN't RIGHT !!!

SPARTACUS!!!

check out posts by farangdemon, hes done comprhensive studies on this