Conquer Club

[bigimg]http://musiciansheadquarters.com/ccdicen.png[/bigimg]

i dont know how to do screenshot but from this game

Number of Dice : 39


Longest Streaks:

1

: 2

2

: 1

3

: 1

4

: 2

5

: 0

6

: 2

Number of Attack Dice : 24


Longest Streaks:

* 1

: 2

* 2

: 1

* 3

: 2

* 4

: 2

* 5

: 0

* 6

: 1

Number of Defence Dice : 15


Longest Streaks:

* 1

: 1

* 2

: 1

* 3

: 1

* 4

: 1

* 5

: 0

* 6

: 2

Number of Rolls : 11


Longest Streaks:
█

: 4
█

: 1
█

: 2

Longest Streaks:


3v2 █ : 1

3v2 █ : 1

3v1 █ : 1

2v1 █ : 1

1v1 █ : 2

3v1 █ : 2

1v2 █ : 1

Most Consecutive Troops Defeated: 2


Most Consecutive Troops Lost: 6

Well, I thought it was going to crash Firefox, but here it is.

Yowza, lots of data Timminz.

How are things looking for the Analysis, Chipv? Any summary of results so far?


--Andy

Haven't played for ages. Nice to see dice are shite as ever.

I was defender. And the attacker had 22 vs 15. He lost 1 man. Just 1, in taking me. Pathetic as ever. I think I'll finish up the games and go hibernate again. Think CC woulda sorted it by now.

Damned straights, righterzers. Horrible terrible no-good very-bad intensity cubes.


--Andy

Do we have a pre-dice change and post-dice-change comparison going? I posted my results from before the change...i just reset them...i'll post again after i've played some games.

If not, that would be an interesting thing to see!


--Andy

Lets see.... All I see here are streaks...

7 in a row 3x1 win 0,0914% chance

5 in a row 3x1 lose 0,41% twice

4 in a row 3x1 lose 1,2% chance

4 in a row 3x2 win 2,4% chance

all in less than 300 rolls....

[bigimg]http://i47.tinypic.com/x209w7.png[/bigimg]

Looking at the current "Any Dice" record.. then i have the most consecutive won and lost.

AND, LESS THAN 24 HOURS AFTER THAT>>>>




SEVEN LOSSES IN A ROW! WOW!!!!

ZERO POINT ZERO FOUR PERCENT CHANCE!

that is, in a true random system...

Yowza, out of a 17 sample size...

Little know fact, Lackattack is currently part of a clandestine organization with the goal to change the way numbers work. Through some techno-high-coding, usually under the codename N.I.N.J.A., or Number Impairing Now Justified Alteration, Lackattack has substituted high numbers for low numbers, and low numbers for even lower numbers. This now means that there are no high numbers on Conquer Club. Thus, the best way to win your game, never assault---and play in total-ultimate-defense.


--Andy

i had a really nice streak i wanted to post, but my mom washed my underwear... the black jesus has spoken...-the black jesus

AndyDufresne wrote:Yowza, out of a 17 sample size...

Little know fact, Lackattack is currently part of a clandestine organization with the goal to change the way numbers work. Through some techno-high-coding, usually under the codename N.I.N.J.A., or Number Impairing Now Justified Alteration, Lackattack has substituted high numbers for low numbers, and low numbers for even lower numbers. This now means that there are no high numbers on Conquer Club. Thus, the best way to win your game, never assault---and play in total-ultimate-defense.


--Andy

Yes, on 17 rolls I got a seven 3x1loss, a 2 3x1 loss and a simple 3x1 loss
10 rolls. Only 13 of those were 3x1

roll 13 3x1 and try to find 7 losses in a row... you shold not find those.

and I had several times before found 6 and 7 streaks, as you can see on the photobucket account I use to post those outrageous rolls

but whatever, it matters not, the system is broken, no one cares, as long as it is fun, right? Why go to the doctor for a checkup if you dont want to find out whats wrong with you, right?
if I someday have a 20 streak of 3x1 on 20 rolls, you will dismiss it saying it is ony 20 rolls

Intensity Cubes are a little like politics. More often than not, you'll never win someone over to your side with any amount of evidence/hearsay/inference one can muster.


--Andy

For those who say I complain of losing too much

here:



SIXTEEN 3X1 WIN IN A ROW - IF THAT´S A NORMAL STREAK, I GIVE UP

chance to get one of those? zero point zero zero zero zero zero fourty six percent

0,0000046% or, ONE IN A TWENTY MILLION chance...

ONCE EVERY 20.000.000 ROLLS. - SOMETHING, OF COURSE, VERY VERY VERY COMMON

Some pretty 'sticky' runs of dice on my record now

[bigimg]http://i555.photobucket.com/albums/jj467/dixon-simon-j/Dicestreakssummary.jpg[/bigimg]

14v23--I took all 23 and lost none on my first turn in a manual game the other day--this is the best streak I have ever had for sure.

Number of Rolls : 92


Longest Streaks:
█

: 4
█

: 4
█

: 6 (Hover to see dice)


* 2
* 6

* 2
* 3

Longest Streaks:



3v2 █ : 3

3v1 █ : 2

3v1 █ : 2

3v2 █ : 4

2v2 █ : 1

3v2 █ : 4

Most Consecutive Troops Defeated: 12


Most Consecutive Troops Lost: 10


███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████

My printscreen doesn't work so that's the best I can do.. Unless I'm reading this thread or my Dice Streaks wrong, that's the Up to 1000 Most consecutive troops defeated record.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

AndyDufresne wrote:Intensity Cubes are a little like politics. More often than not, you'll never win someone over to your side with any amount of evidence/hearsay/inference one can muster.


--Andy

I'm gunna sig that.

Who cares if you have evidence! The world is flat, the sky is falling, your political beliefs are wrong, and the dice are my best friend!

Now we are getting somewhere. I can accept that.

i win again.
most consecuative troops defeated 35.. most lost 27

12 attacks, all of them 3x1 or 2x1

10 losses. 2 wins. 5-to-6 loss ratio. 16% win ratio. lol...