Page 3 of 21
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:34 pm
by Aimless
Danmagnet wrote:The way it came across seemed a little nervous to me, particularly this:
I was just trying to get the ball rolling. It being a random vote, I would have unvoted once something better came along
That's 3 excuses in one hit!
First, I only count two "excuses," and second, I was speaking the truth. See what happened in the zombie game if you don't believe me.
Since you guys haven't played with me before, you should know that I
always try to take charge of a game; I do it when I'm town because I generally don't trust the rest of the town to find scum, and I do it when I'm scum because I don't trust the rest of the town not to find scum.
One of the ways I do it is by placing votes against people to get them to talk. It's useful for two reasons - first, it gets them to defend themselves, and second, you can find out who else might be scummy by seeing who jumps on which bandwagon. Both of these are benefits two the town.
And it works, to. See? You voted me, I'm defending myself.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:34 pm
by Aimless
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Looks like the newbies want to take you down buddy lol.
QFT, man, QFT. Apparently they think that voting is a scumtell.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:37 pm
by Serbia
First, what's QFT? (uber-noob in da house)
Second, I'm suspicious right away of Kalishnikov, since his name suggests he's a commie, and I'm always suspicious of commies. Not voting, yet, just saying....
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:40 pm
by Neutrino
Aimless wrote:Danmagnet wrote:The way it came across seemed a little nervous to me, particularly this:
I was just trying to get the ball rolling. It being a random vote, I would have unvoted once something better came along
That's 3 excuses in one hit!
Since you guys haven't played with me before, you should know that I
always try to take charge of a game; I do it when I'm town because I generally don't trust the rest of the town to find scum, and I do it when I'm scum because I don't trust the rest of the town not to find scum.
.
Then what proof do we have that you arn't scum? Hmm?
FOS Aimless (im not quite ready for a vote)
Next time, try to remove all mention of scum from your defences.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:40 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:46 pm
by Aimless
Neutrino wrote:Then what proof do we have that you arn't scum?
What proof would you believe? Or are you just fishing for power roles, scum?
Next time, try to remove all mention of scum from your defences.

Why?
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:49 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
Vote Neutrino
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:49 pm
by Neutrino
Aimless wrote:Next time, try to remove all mention of scum from your defences.

Why?
Because you said
"if Im not scum I do this, and if I am I do the same."
If you were wiser, you would have left out any mention of scum in your post, and hopefully let everyone assume that you arn't.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:49 pm
by Serbia
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:51 pm
by Aimless
Neutrino wrote:Aimless wrote:Next time, try to remove all mention of scum from your defences.

Why?
Because you said
"if Im not scum I do this, and if I am I do the same."
If you were wiser, you would have left out any mention of scum in your post, and hopefully let everyone assume that you arn't.
Leaving it out and letting everyone assume otherwise would be a scum tactic.
I am not scum, therefore I do not lie to the town. Even by omission.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:54 pm
by Neutrino
Aimless wrote:Neutrino wrote:Aimless wrote:Next time, try to remove all mention of scum from your defences.

Why?
Because you said
"if Im not scum I do this, and if I am I do the same."
If you were wiser, you would have left out any mention of scum in your post, and hopefully let everyone assume that you arn't.
Leaving it out and letting everyone assume otherwise would be a scum tactic.
I am not scum, therefore I do not lie to the town. Even by omission.
Awfully noble of you, but ok, ill let it slide.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:55 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
Being that this is a newbie game neutrino he is trying to explain stuff to the newbies as well.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:58 pm
by Neutrino
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Neutrino
Oh god, not again.
What is it about me that you hate?
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 4:59 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
Neutrino wrote:LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Neutrino
Oh god, not again.
What is it about me that you hate?
That sounds like an OMGUS statement. The last time I had evidence telling me you were scum.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:02 pm
by Neutrino
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Neutrino wrote:LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Neutrino
Oh god, not again.
What is it about me that you hate?
That sounds like an OMGUS statement. The last time I had evidence telling me you were scum.
Has that game ended?
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:04 pm
by freezie
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Neutrino wrote:LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Vote Neutrino
Oh god, not again.
What is it about me that you hate?
That sounds like an OMGUS statement. The last time I had evidence telling me you were scum.
And where is your evidence for this game? I would like to hear it.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:07 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
Yes that game has ended. I investigated you when I was a daycop the first day and was told by the mod that you were scum. As such, I had to take you down even though it turned out afterwards that pancake threw a wrench in that by having you as some kind of townie that would show up as scum.
My only evidence this game was the OMGUS statement he made after I threw it out there.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:08 pm
by pancakemix
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Yes that game has ended. I investigated you when I was a daycop the first day and was told by the mod that you were scum. As such, I had to take you down even though it turned out afterwards that pancake threw a wrench in that by having you as some kind of townie that would show up as scum.
And I was laughing my head off the whole time.

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:09 pm
by freezie
Danmagnet wrote:My vote for Aimless was merely going with the crowd, but the rather nervous way he seemed to weasel his way out of the sticky situation he put himself in makes me suspicious. I think Aimless panicked a bit there as he saw the newbs killing him quickly.
My vote stands.
I still find his reaction suspicious, but you stating you were going with the crowd...you were the first to vote for him...
FOS: Danmagnet
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:11 pm
by Neutrino
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Yes that game has ended. I investigated you when I was a daycop the first day and was told by the mod that you were scum. As such, I had to take you down even though it turned out afterwards that pancake threw a wrench in that by having you as some kind of townie that would show up as scum.
My only evidence this game was the OMGUS statement he made after I threw it out there.
I was not happy that I got Death Miller. I wanted to see you lynched for lynching me.
Luckily (not for the town) You got assassinated that night, so I was happy.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 5:14 pm
by LSU Tiger Josh
Actually it was the next night as I investigated Aimless the next day and found that he was Neutral. Besides the way you started the game by asking about scum type roles is what made me investiage you to begin with as the 2nd question you asked still didn't go with my way of thinking on logic lmao.
That was a crappy role to get though so glad I didn't get it

Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:32 pm
by kalishnikov
Serbia wrote:First, what's QFT? (uber-noob in da house)
Second, I'm suspicious right away of Kalishnikov, since his name suggests he's a commie, and I'm always suspicious of commies. Not voting, yet, just saying....
Lol, are you serious? I hope not... Roles aren't assigned by who's name sounds suspicious...
Kalishnikov was the last name of Russian military leader and weapons developer from the 40's... The "Ak" in Ak-47 means Altima Kalishnikova, Kalishnikov's ultimate design.
Pittsburgh Communists Unite! Viva La Revolucion! (don't know any Russian).
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 6:52 pm
by pancakemix
kalishnikov wrote:Pittsburgh Communists Unite!

Another Pittsburgher!
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:28 pm
by Aimless
Danmagnet wrote:/yawns, gets out of bed etc.
Vote: Aimless
First vote against me; and Danmagnet's first post in the thread.
Danmagnet wrote:My vote for Aimless was merely going with the crowd, but the rather nervous way he seemed to weasel his way out of the sticky situation he put himself in makes me suspicious. I think Aimless panicked a bit there as he saw the newbs killing him quickly.
My vote stands.
Going with the crowd, and yet his was the first vote against me. Thus, a lie.
Danmagnet wrote:The way it came across seemed a little nervous to me, particularly this:
I was just trying to get the ball rolling. It being a random vote, I would have unvoted once something better came along
That's 3 excuses in one hit!
In retrospect, this is a pretty feeble rationale, especially since he claimed that I "panicked."
FOS Danmagnet, I think you're the most suspicious person in the thread so far. Your posts look to me like you saw an opportunity to get me lynched and tried to exploit it.
And one last thing. The following people need to post more :
Cynthia
Clapper011
Serbia
diddle
sheepofdumb
Kill_Schmitty
spin, please prod diddle, sheep, and Kill_Schmitty. They have yet to post at all.
The town cannot win unless people post. If no one posts, the scum can submarine all they want without looking suspicious, and we'll never get anywhere. Speak up, or don't sign up for the game.
Posted: Thu May 03, 2007 7:28 pm
by sheepofdumb
pancakemix wrote:kalishnikov wrote:Pittsburgh Communists Unite!

Another Pittsburgher!
Well yenz unite to form the league of the pittsburghers?