Page 3 of 5

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 4:31 pm
by Juan_Bottom
I can raise that.

Image

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:30 am
by BigBallinStalin
BigBallinStalin wrote:
ooge wrote:I cant find the video. Michael Moore interviews Stephen Moore who thinks that Capitalism is better than democracy.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6740016 Stephen Moore is a long time defender of low taxes on the wealthy less regulation..blah...blah..blah.


Anything in particular you want to talk about in that article?


No thanks, BBS. I'm busy spewing some crap I heard from a highly laminated pundit on politics and stuff.

Oh, you are? I really wish you'd stop doing that.

I can't stop it. They do all the thinking for me, so why think?

I know, right? All you need is one pool of slop to get the whole picture.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 8:57 am
by thegreekdog
chang50 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:It always amuses me when Europeans say that the United States is center-right as if that has caused us problems.


I never took it that way as much as I took it as simply making the point that "even our liberals aren't very liberal". Which is largely true.


As someone who has said this you are 100% correct Woody,I mostly used it descriptively,and perhaps to emphasise the point that often Americans are globally unaware and self absorbed.Any regular poster here can vouch for that.Hard to say if that has caused America problems or not..


I think most people in most countries are self-absorbed, and I'm not sure what that has to do with being center-right (or left, or center-left or right or whatever).

I get very annoyed (call it a pet peeve) when folks from other countries deign to tell Americans the problems with the United States. To be fair, I get very annoyed when anyone tells anyone else what their problems are. Worry about your own house before you start worrying about our house.

DRe: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 12:17 pm
by chang50
Woodruff wrote:
Nordik wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Nobunaga wrote:If I had a Big Brother, he'd look like Obama. ;)


Obama is far from blameless, but the PRISM program was instituted under Bush.


So much for change eh?


Indeed.


Don't the same group of people run the US regardless of who is elected?

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:31 pm
by NoSurvivors
It sounds like something straight from the plot of a sci-fi movie: By 2015, all Americans will be implanted with a microchip per order of Obamacare.


http://people.howstuffworks.com/obamaca ... ochips.htm

Lol, and so it begins.. the media is always watching, and now the government will be tracking Americans.. brilliant job guys.. evidently you elected the right man.... :lol: (though I can't say you had much of an option on election day!)

PS-- ask phatscotty.. I have been on this 1984 = 2013 thing forever.

Re: DRe: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 5:40 pm
by Woodruff
chang50 wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Nordik wrote:
Woodruff wrote:
Nobunaga wrote:If I had a Big Brother, he'd look like Obama. ;)


Obama is far from blameless, but the PRISM program was instituted under Bush.


So much for change eh?


Indeed.


Don't the same group of people run the US regardless of who is elected?


In my opinion? Yes. These days, they're called "corporations" and they are people, my friend!

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 6:45 pm
by thegreekdog
BigBallinStalin wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:
ooge wrote:I cant find the video. Michael Moore interviews Stephen Moore who thinks that Capitalism is better than democracy.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6740016 Stephen Moore is a long time defender of low taxes on the wealthy less regulation..blah...blah..blah.


Anything in particular you want to talk about in that article?


No thanks, BBS. I'm busy spewing some crap I heard from a highly laminated pundit on politics and stuff.

Oh, you are? I really wish you'd stop doing that.

I can't stop it. They do all the thinking for me, so why think?

I know, right? All you need is one pool of slop to get the whole picture.


He doesn't respond to people who are rude. I think he defines "rude people" as people who disagree with him and who provide good arguments.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 7:30 pm
by Lootifer
Yeah im not going to pick him in my left wing CC rampage party. Nordik or whatever his names gets in though, and J_B can come for lolz.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:10 pm
by ooge
Lootifer wrote:Yeah im not going to pick him in my left wing CC rampage party. Nordik or whatever his names gets in though, and J_B can come for lolz.


"The dingo ate my baby" oh wait a minute that was Australia not New Zealand,doesn't matter Aussy's ,Kiwi's they are all the same.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:17 pm
by Phatscotty
NoSurvivors wrote:
It sounds like something straight from the plot of a sci-fi movie: By 2015, all Americans will be implanted with a microchip per order of Obamacare.


http://people.howstuffworks.com/obamaca ... ochips.htm

Lol, and so it begins.. the media is always watching, and now the government will be tracking Americans.. brilliant job guys.. evidently you elected the right man.... :lol: (though I can't say you had much of an option on election day!)

PS-- ask phatscotty.. I have been on this 1984 = 2013 thing forever.


I was already there in the RFID thread and the Obamacare thread. thanks for continuing to talk about it. One of these days enough people will care, and then they will ask us "where were you in 2012?" followed by some logic that since you didn't care before, they themselves don't have to say anything about being microchipped

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:31 pm
by ooge
Phatscotty wrote:
NoSurvivors wrote:
It sounds like something straight from the plot of a sci-fi movie: By 2015, all Americans will be implanted with a microchip per order of Obamacare.


http://people.howstuffworks.com/obamaca ... ochips.htm

Lol, and so it begins.. the media is always watching, and now the government will be tracking Americans.. brilliant job guys.. evidently you elected the right man.... :lol: (though I can't say you had much of an option on election day!)

PS-- ask phatscotty.. I have been on this 1984 = 2013 thing forever.


I was already there in the RFID thread and the Obamacare thread. thanks for continuing to talk about it. One of these days enough people will care, and then they will ask us "where were you in 2012?"


do you know why Ron Paul did not sign onto the articles of impeachment that Dennis Kucinich brought forth against George Bush in 2008?The time to stop this would have been then.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:35 pm
by Phatscotty
ooge wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
NoSurvivors wrote:
It sounds like something straight from the plot of a sci-fi movie: By 2015, all Americans will be implanted with a microchip per order of Obamacare.


http://people.howstuffworks.com/obamaca ... ochips.htm

Lol, and so it begins.. the media is always watching, and now the government will be tracking Americans.. brilliant job guys.. evidently you elected the right man.... :lol: (though I can't say you had much of an option on election day!)

PS-- ask phatscotty.. I have been on this 1984 = 2013 thing forever.


I was already there in the RFID thread and the Obamacare thread. thanks for continuing to talk about it. One of these days enough people will care, and then they will ask us "where were you in 2012?"


do you know why Ron Paul did not sign onto the articles of impeachment that Dennis Kucinich brought forth against George Bush in 2008?The time to stop this would have been then.


Impeaching Bush would not automatically repeal the repeal anything(neither did electing O), so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Obamacare wasn't passed until 2009, unless you are talking about something else

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:45 pm
by ooge
Phatscotty wrote:
ooge wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
NoSurvivors wrote:
It sounds like something straight from the plot of a sci-fi movie: By 2015, all Americans will be implanted with a microchip per order of Obamacare.


http://people.howstuffworks.com/obamaca ... ochips.htm

Lol, and so it begins.. the media is always watching, and now the government will be tracking Americans.. brilliant job guys.. evidently you elected the right man.... :lol: (though I can't say you had much of an option on election day!)

PS-- ask phatscotty.. I have been on this 1984 = 2013 thing forever.


I was already there in the RFID thread and the Obamacare thread. thanks for continuing to talk about it. One of these days enough people will care, and then they will ask us "where were you in 2012?"


do you know why Ron Paul did not sign onto the articles of impeachment that Dennis Kucinich brought forth against George Bush in 2008?The time to stop this would have been then.


Impeaching Bush would not automatically repeal the repeal anything(neither did electing O), so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Obamacare wasn't passed until 2009, unless you are talking about something else
oops I am,I thought this was still about eavesdropping of Americans.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:46 pm
by Phatscotty
ooge wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
ooge wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
NoSurvivors wrote:
It sounds like something straight from the plot of a sci-fi movie: By 2015, all Americans will be implanted with a microchip per order of Obamacare.


http://people.howstuffworks.com/obamaca ... ochips.htm

Lol, and so it begins.. the media is always watching, and now the government will be tracking Americans.. brilliant job guys.. evidently you elected the right man.... :lol: (though I can't say you had much of an option on election day!)

PS-- ask phatscotty.. I have been on this 1984 = 2013 thing forever.


I was already there in the RFID thread and the Obamacare thread. thanks for continuing to talk about it. One of these days enough people will care, and then they will ask us "where were you in 2012?"


do you know why Ron Paul did not sign onto the articles of impeachment that Dennis Kucinich brought forth against George Bush in 2008?The time to stop this would have been then.


Impeaching Bush would not automatically repeal the repeal anything(neither did electing O), so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Obamacare wasn't passed until 2009, unless you are talking about something else
oops I am,I thought this was still about eavesdropping of Americans.


Well, you could try looking at the post you responded to, which is about RFID chipping.

This thread is about a lot of things going on right now that are Orwellian.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:51 pm
by ooge
oky dokey

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:28 am
by Juan_Bottom
3. While everyone was busily losing their shpadoinkle on Twitter and the blogs, Google, Facebook, Dropbox, Yahoo, Microsoft, Paltalk, AOL and Apple all announced in separate statements that not only were they unaware of any PRISM program, but they also confirmed that there’s no way the government had infiltrated the privately-owned servers maintained by these companies. Furthermore, Google wrote, “Indeed, the U.S. government does not have direct access or a “back door” to the information stored in our data centers. We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.” Google also described how it will occasionally and voluntarily hand over user data to the government, but only after it’s been vetted and scrutinized by Google’s legal team.

http://thedailybanter.com/2013/06/nsa-s ... naccurate/

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:32 am
by Phatscotty
Juan_Bottom wrote:
3. While everyone was busily losing their shpadoinkle on Twitter and the blogs, Google, Facebook, Dropbox, Yahoo, Microsoft, Paltalk, AOL and Apple all announced in separate statements that not only were they unaware of any PRISM program, but they also confirmed that there’s no way the government had infiltrated the privately-owned servers maintained by these companies. Furthermore, Google wrote, “Indeed, the U.S. government does not have direct access or a “back door” to the information stored in our data centers. We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.” Google also described how it will occasionally and voluntarily hand over user data to the government, but only after it’s been vetted and scrutinized by Google’s legal team.

http://thedailybanter.com/2013/06/nsa-s ... naccurate/


For the Ceo's to say anything else would be economic suicide

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:40 am
by Phatscotty
Even Paul Krugman can do the right thing and call this what it is.

In order to do this right, we need an Executive branch that we can trust. Sadly that is not the case and it hasn't been for a long time.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 12:43 am
by Woodruff
Juan_Bottom wrote:
3. While everyone was busily losing their shpadoinkle on Twitter and the blogs, Google, Facebook, Dropbox, Yahoo, Microsoft, Paltalk, AOL and Apple all announced in separate statements that not only were they unaware of any PRISM program, but they also confirmed that there’s no way the government had infiltrated the privately-owned servers maintained by these companies.


These companies are all intelligent and tech-savvy enough to know that such a statement can only be a "hope" at best, rather than being definatory. This is pure salesmanship.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:26 am
by Juan_Bottom
I disagree.

If the NSA wanted to hack into google's servers, they'd probably have to break into their offices and do it on site.
If, hypothetically speaking, they wanted to hack into Google's servers with a laptop somehow, I would bet all the money in the world that Google would beat them. Google has infinity dollars to spend on this, and the very brightest minds that money can buy. Furthermore, all of their employees are extremely happy, so there's no reason whatsoever for them to sabotage Google either.
Who does the NSA hire to protect their servers?

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 1:28 am
by ooge
Phatscotty wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:
3. While everyone was busily losing their shpadoinkle on Twitter and the blogs, Google, Facebook, Dropbox, Yahoo, Microsoft, Paltalk, AOL and Apple all announced in separate statements that not only were they unaware of any PRISM program, but they also confirmed that there’s no way the government had infiltrated the privately-owned servers maintained by these companies. Furthermore, Google wrote, “Indeed, the U.S. government does not have direct access or a “back door” to the information stored in our data centers. We had not heard of a program called PRISM until yesterday.” Google also described how it will occasionally and voluntarily hand over user data to the government, but only after it’s been vetted and scrutinized by Google’s legal team.

http://thedailybanter.com/2013/06/nsa-s ... naccurate/


For the Ceo's to say anything else would be economic suicide


or legally at this point, the only way they can respond.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:41 am
by Woodruff
Juan_Bottom wrote:I disagree.
If the NSA wanted to hack into google's servers, they'd probably have to break into their offices and do it on site.
If, hypothetically speaking, they wanted to hack into Google's servers with a laptop somehow, I would bet all the money in the world that Google would beat them. Google has infinity dollars to spend on this, and the very brightest minds that money can buy. Furthermore, all of their employees are extremely happy, so there's no reason whatsoever for them to sabotage Google either.
Who does the NSA hire to protect their servers?


See, here's the problem...I never know when you're playing the dumbass or not.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:35 am
by BigBallinStalin
Woodruff wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:
3. While everyone was busily losing their shpadoinkle on Twitter and the blogs, Google, Facebook, Dropbox, Yahoo, Microsoft, Paltalk, AOL and Apple all announced in separate statements that not only were they unaware of any PRISM program, but they also confirmed that there’s no way the government had infiltrated the privately-owned servers maintained by these companies.


These companies are all intelligent and tech-savvy enough to know that such a statement can only be a "hope" at best, rather than being definatory. This is pure salesmanship.


Hmm... Sure, the government didn't infiltrate their servers. The NSA simply asked for access and got it. PRISM is one of the many programs involving data mining by the NSA, so it can easily be the case that those companies were unaware of PRISM but were aware of their other similar programs, e.g. the Terrorism Surveillance Program (TSP) and those two other programs (can't find the article atm).

I'm not saying that JB is a liar, but his source and/or those companies are great at being misleading. Who knows, maybe JB rearranged his source and inadvertently spewed out something incorrect.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 4:36 am
by BigBallinStalin
Woodruff wrote:
Juan_Bottom wrote:I disagree.
If the NSA wanted to hack into google's servers, they'd probably have to break into their offices and do it on site.
If, hypothetically speaking, they wanted to hack into Google's servers with a laptop somehow, I would bet all the money in the world that Google would beat them. Google has infinity dollars to spend on this, and the very brightest minds that money can buy. Furthermore, all of their employees are extremely happy, so there's no reason whatsoever for them to sabotage Google either.
Who does the NSA hire to protect their servers?


See, here's the problem...I never know when you're playing the dumbass or not.


Yeah, good question.

@JB: Against the FISA courts, the company really doesn't have a choice.

Re: 2013 = 1984

Posted: Tue Jun 11, 2013 8:54 am
by NoSurvivors
Phatscotty wrote:
ooge wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
NoSurvivors wrote:
It sounds like something straight from the plot of a sci-fi movie: By 2015, all Americans will be implanted with a microchip per order of Obamacare.


http://people.howstuffworks.com/obamaca ... ochips.htm

Lol, and so it begins.. the media is always watching, and now the government will be tracking Americans.. brilliant job guys.. evidently you elected the right man.... :lol: (though I can't say you had much of an option on election day!)

PS-- ask phatscotty.. I have been on this 1984 = 2013 thing forever.


I was already there in the RFID thread and the Obamacare thread. thanks for continuing to talk about it. One of these days enough people will care, and then they will ask us "where were you in 2012?"


do you know why Ron Paul did not sign onto the articles of impeachment that Dennis Kucinich brought forth against George Bush in 2008?The time to stop this would have been then.


Impeaching Bush would not automatically repeal the repeal anything(neither did electing O), so I'm not sure what you are getting at. Obamacare wasn't passed until 2009, unless you are talking about something else


the two are sort of interchangeable, chipping and being tracked.. who knows what the government will put into the chips? Not you, not I.