Page 3 of 3

Re: Great-Ollie

Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 11:38 am
by Dukasaur
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Do you have me listed as old or new since I was conqueror prior to Oct 25 2011 and afterwards ? I just dint want to pad your stats either direction.

Old. Your medal was granted retroactively.

Re: Great-Ollie

Posted: Sat Feb 22, 2014 8:53 pm
by jiminski
Great-Ollie wrote:
codeblue1018 wrote:
betiko wrote:
codeblue1018 wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Sure, he exploited something that CC said was acceptable. They'll probably change their minds and call it "gross abuse," but I digress.

G-O is still a worthy opponent. I'm not sure why people get so butthurt about the latest Conqueror drama.


I have no problem with people doing what they need to do to become conqueror; I do however have a problem with people that flip-flop between decisions, that's all.

Not sure how they can deem this type of play "gross abuse" when it is totally within the rules; no missed turns, no hostage taking etc. a person has 24 hours to make a move, period!


I saw someone say that GO would never do such thing before this happened, that he was "classier" than that. I ve never seen ollie say such thing though. Not sure he s responsible of what people think he will/won t do.


He did say that he wouldn't resort to these tactics to achieve conqueror in a post that he quoted me on. I'll have to see if I can find it.


It was in the should we call it a josko.ri thread. I did however at the end of the thread publicly announce what i was going to do. I really think you guys need to concentrate on more important things in life rather then finding things to dis credit me. Personally i don't give a crap, I'm just sayin. All the mud slinging going around about me since a spiked my score to achieve conqueror is ridiculous. I did not break any site rules so why do you not give it a rest people. I think that on any given day anyone who set's their mind to it can beat anyone else on this site. I do not consider myself a super player, but i do consider myself well versed in all game styles, types, ect. As for my dice, they are just like everyone else who plays on this site, unpredictable. I did go 9 for 10 against DJBandit, but also went 2 for 9 against BRADDY. So i guess all my good dice rolls where against DJ and bad one's against BRADDY? lol


I think that's where the exchange should have ended. Ollie being reasonably conciliatory and factual (between the lines at least.)
Regarding the rest and the mention of The Spanking Monkies, we are glad and proud to include Code as one of our number. He is a good monki, of sound principle and honourable intent. he is loyal and generous, kind and impassioned. and he likes a good rumble... i love that!
And more than that, all comers welcome. *annoying emoticatory wink*

Re: Great-Ollie

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 4:38 am
by KraphtOne
I'm just saying, it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if all of you got Lou Gehrig's disease...

Re: Great-Ollie

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 7:46 am
by jiminski
KraphtOne wrote:I'm just saying, it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world if all of you got Lou Gehrig's disease...


Ahh my favourite football chant.

Re: Great-Ollie

Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2014 9:00 pm
by bird45
Played with him twice as teammate won both games the guy plays fairly and has good strat might be on a hot streak right now with dice. Don't accuse someone of cheating unless u know for sure its fucked up!