Conquer Club

id join in the bottom group i think im at 1379 at the moment.

Moved

Welcome to organising, DIM (if you have done it before then sorry ).

I'm in to the group of lowest ranks if there's still room

added got tonkaed and also updated first post with rank insignias.

wacicha wrote:Moved

thanks mate. wanna join?

amazzony wrote:Welcome to organising, DIM (if you have done it before then sorry ).

I'm in to the group of lowest ranks if there's still room

this is my third but the first 2 were a long time ago last summer i think.


btw added.

I'm in. (Score hovering around 1800-1900)

in 1500-1999

added Chadwick31 and japser_be

Dim, you caught me when i had dipped below 2000, i dont really care but if its easier for you feel free to bump me

GoVegan wrote:Dim, you caught me when i had dipped below 2000, i dont really care but if its easier for you feel free to bump me

don't worry mate. i'll be constantly checking ranks until the tournament starts and if somebody gains/loses points i'll put him in a higher/lower class, assuming there's room in that class.
that's why i made all the names clickable in the first post so i can easily check you guys.

I'll join up
1973 presently

Godd wrote:I'll join up
1973 presently

added

thanks for joining.

I'll sign up. 1843 at the moment

sign me up

You are too good for this Fitz.

im in, I'm floating around 1500 points.

put me in

I would like in!

So you equate a seargant with a cook?

sigh me up please

sign me up 1500-1999

ugh i just lost to a cadet....

sign me up pls

DiM wrote:

rebelman wrote:

DiM wrote:but i'm thinking something else

what about??

2500+
2000-2499
1500-1999
1000-1499

sounds good but make the last category 0 - 1499

actually 1-1499 because 0 is impossible.

no, not techincally, unless lack has coded a lower limmit, and if so i haven't heard of it. a score of zero could be achieved if a 20-point player beat another 20-point player. Then, the looser would loose 20 points and be at zero. technically, even a negative score is possible. say a guy with one point plays another guy with one point. Then the winner gets 20 points because points added = 20 times the loosers score divided by the winners score. And the looser looses 20 points and goes to -19. (unless lack has coded a lower limit to the scoring system that I'm unaware of) Once at a negative score, assuming it's possible, then this person would actually LOOSE points when they win and GAIN points when the loose because, when the win, with the current formula, they will gain a NEGATIVE amount of points... is there something wrong with my math here?