Page 3 of 4

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:28 pm
by muy_thaiguy
InkL0sed wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote::shock: Whadja have to say to that now tonky my son?


You're actually relatively moderate compared to him :lol:
I'm still not exactly sure how the test works to begin with, not to mention to many flaws in it that can be taken the wrong way.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:29 pm
by unriggable
got tonkaed wrote:i cant believe i cant beat napoelon in an election.


What can we say, big words make him sound smart and that's what the people want.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:38 pm
by InkL0sed
Enter name of first candidate: Hanul

Enter name of second candidate: unriggable

Enter social standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-4.51

Enter economic standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-2.75

Enter social standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-2

Enter economic standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-6
Hanul(-2.75, -4.51): 10
unriggable(-6.0, -2.0): 9

Nobody can beat Hanul :lol:

Enter name of first candidate: Hanul

Enter name of second candidate: Napoleon

Enter social standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-4.51

Enter economic standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-2.75

Enter social standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-1

Enter economic standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)8
Hanul(-2.75, -4.51): 8
Napoleon(8.0, -1.0): 11

Except, that is, for Napoleon! :lol: :lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:39 pm
by unriggable
What kind of equation are you using?

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:43 pm
by InkL0sed
The distance formula.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:44 pm
by unriggable
InkL0sed wrote:The distance formula.


y = mx + b

Where M is your political compass standings and B is the length of your dick.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:45 pm
by InkL0sed
unriggable wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:The distance formula.


y = mx + b

Where M is your political compass standings and B is the length of your dick.


:lol: That's not the distance formula. I posted it about a page back...

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:46 pm
by nagerous
Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.28

:lol:

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:47 pm
by got tonkaed
nagerous wrote:Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.28

:lol:


loler at least you arent sitting on the fence about your views.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:47 pm
by Frigidus
Let's do this!

Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

Edit: Wait the distance formula? So the winner is the person with the most extreme views? :?

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 2:48 pm
by nagerous
got tonkaed wrote:
nagerous wrote:Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.28

:lol:


loler at least you arent sitting on the fence about your views.


Hell Yeah!

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:00 pm
by Fircoal
nagerous wrote:Your political compass
Economic Left/Right: -4.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.28

:lol:


Economic Left/Right: -2.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.62

I want to go against Nag. ;)

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:06 pm
by InkL0sed
Frigidus wrote:Let's do this!

Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

Edit: Wait the distance formula? So the winner is the person with the most extreme views? :?


No! I've explained this already, it's the distance between the voter's views/coordinates and the politician's. So actually, more moderate politicians have a greater chance at winning.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:14 pm
by Frigidus
InkL0sed wrote:
Frigidus wrote:Let's do this!

Economic Left/Right: -1.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

Edit: Wait the distance formula? So the winner is the person with the most extreme views? :?


No! I've explained this already, it's the distance between the voter's views/coordinates and the politician's. So actually, more moderate politicians have a greater chance at winning.


Oooooooh, OK.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 3:27 pm
by OnlyAmbrose
Interesting test :)

I got:

Economic Left/Right: 3.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -3.44

Looks like a moderate libertarian to me...

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:12 pm
by InkL0sed
Enter name of first candidate: Napoleon

Enter name of second candidate: nagerous

Enter social standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-1

Enter economic standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)8

Enter social standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-7.28

Enter economic standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-4.75
Napoleon(8.0, -1.0): 7
nagerous(-4.75, -7.28 ): 12

nagerous only won because he was running against Napoleon :P

Enter name of first candidate: nagerous

Enter name of second candidate: Frigidus

Enter social standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-7.28

Enter economic standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-4.75

Enter social standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-2.72

Enter economic standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-1.62
nagerous(-4.75, -7.28 ): 1
Frigidus(-1.62, -2.72): 18

And the moderate wins, of course, hehe.

Enter name of first candidate: Frigidus

Enter name of second candidate: Fircoal

Enter social standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-2.72

Enter economic standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-1.62

Enter social standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-4.62

Enter economic standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-2.25
Frigidus(-1.62, -2.72): 14
Fircoal(-2.25, -4.62): 5

No surprise here, either.

Enter name of first candidate: Frigidus

Enter name of second candidate: OnlyAmbrose

Enter social standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-2.72

Enter economic standing of first candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-1.62

Enter social standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)-3.44

Enter economic standing of second candidate(on a scale of -10 to 10)3.62
Frigidus(-1.62, -2.72): 12
OnlyAmbrose(3.62, -3.44): 7

Frigidus is on a roll! Sheesh :wink:

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:15 pm
by Snorri1234
I would personally vote for Frigidus.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 5:22 pm
by Fircoal
Snorri1234 wrote:I would personally vote for Frigidus.


na, I would have voted for Nag. ;)

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 8:50 pm
by InkL0sed
InkL0sed wrote:Mike Gravel: 7
Dennis Kucinich: 12

Dennis Kucinich: 11
John Edwards: 8

Dennis Kucinich: 14
Joe Biden: 5

Dennis Kucinich: 13
Barack Obama: 6

Dennis Kucinich: 9
Hillary Clinton: 10

More to come later.

–––


Hillary Clinton: 11
Chris Dodd: 8

Hillary Clinton: 12
Bill Richardson: 7

Hillary Clinton wins Democratic primaries.

I'll do the Republicans later, then run Hillary against the winner.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:35 pm
by Frigidus
InkL0sed wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:Mike Gravel: 7
Dennis Kucinich: 12

Dennis Kucinich: 11
John Edwards: 8

Dennis Kucinich: 14
Joe Biden: 5

Dennis Kucinich: 13
Barack Obama: 6

Dennis Kucinich: 9
Hillary Clinton: 10

More to come later.

–––


Hillary Clinton: 11
Chris Dodd: 8

Hillary Clinton: 12
Bill Richardson: 7

Hillary Clinton wins Democratic primaries.

I'll do the Republicans later, then run Hillary against the winner.


Our only hope's McCain!

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 9:46 pm
by InkL0sed
It's him or Ron Paul, definitely.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:43 pm
by Frigidus
InkL0sed wrote:It's him or Ron Paul, definitely.


Then all is lost. We must flee.

Posted: Sat Jan 26, 2008 11:00 pm
by InkL0sed
I agree that the Cloverfield beast probably shouldn't be our President...

Image

Image




Yup, he's definitely the monster.

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:45 am
by F1fth
Economic Left/Right: -4.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51

Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:48 am
by DaGip
Makari wrote:I wanted this to say simulated erection :(


Isn't that a dildo?