Page 3 of 4

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:30 pm
by GabonX
oVo wrote:GabonX... that is an amazing amount of hearsay, conjecture and speculation
in the short span of just two posts. The only actual fact that you presented is
"she is gone."
Everything I wrote is 100% verifiable truth. Just because you are unfamiliar with the facts doesn't change them. If you would like you can reply to me with what you consider to be "an amazing amount of hearsay, conjecture and speculation" that I wrote in quotations and I'll give you some of the many possible examples of what I'm talking about.

Frankly I don't see how anyone who is familiar with the issue can object to what I wrote.

Re: i dont understand

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:07 am
by hecter
xerro wrote:
hecter wrote:
xerro wrote:i understand about wicked and the disease, and her behavior and what not, but i dont understand what twill had to do with her gettting fired and whatnot. can someone give me a link or explain it for me????
:mrgreen:
Twill is basically the boss of the forums and the mods that watch over them. Lack is obviously Twill's boss and has the final say about everything.
so twill had her fired cuzz of how she was acting??
and then lack had her banned cuzz of her actions after that?
Pretty much, ya.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:07 am
by wolvertonadams
So what reason did the boss give for firing "wicked"?
It all seems vague :?

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:18 am
by THE KING65
wolvertonadams wrote:So what reason did the boss give for firing "wicked"?
It all seems vague :?
HI WICKED!!

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:50 am
by KLOBBER
wolvertonadams wrote:So what reason did the boss give for firing "wicked"?
It all seems vague :?
Please see revised statement, below.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:52 am
by Joodoo
KLOBBER wrote:
wolvertonadams wrote:So what reason did the boss give for firing "wicked"?
It all seems vague :?
For legal reasons, CC Admin did not disclose personal details of Wicked's dismissal, and they are to be commended for not disclosing these details.

However, the fact is that she was fired because she displayed an ongoing pattern of cheating, member harassment and stalking, and gross abuse of authority.

She was banned from the site altogether because the pattern of cheating, member harassment, and stalking continued after she lost any and all authority as a moderator on the site.

How sad.
KLOBBER, why did you foe me?
On:I heard that wicked got banned because after her demotion, she tried to start a revolution in CC...

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:55 am
by Curmudgeonx
KLOBBER wrote:
wolvertonadams wrote:So what reason did the boss give for firing "wicked"?
It all seems vague :?
For legal reasons, CC Admin did not disclose personal details of Wicked's dismissal, and they are to be commended for not disclosing these details.

However, the fact is that she was fired because she displayed an ongoing pattern of cheating, member harassment and stalking, and gross abuse of authority.

She was banned from the site altogether because the pattern of cheating, member harassment, and stalking continued after she lost any and all authority as a moderator on the site.

How sad.
I would say that this quote is a mis-statement of the actual facts, re: the use of the phrase "ongoing pattern". The actual administration viewpoint can be found in various threads started by Lack. Anything that someone with a personal vendetta like Klobber says should be taken with a grain of salt.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:04 am
by KLOBBER
Curmudgeonx wrote:I would say that this quote is a mis-statement of the actual facts, re: the use of the phrase "ongoing pattern". The actual administration viewpoint can be found in various threads started by Lack. Anything that someone with a personal vendetta like Klobber says should be taken with a grain of salt.
Okay, so the problem you have with that statement is the use of the phrase "ongoing pattern?"

Fair enough! Here's a revised statement of the facts:

For legal reasons, CC Admin did not disclose personal details of Wicked's dismissal to the general public, and they are to be commended for not disclosing these details.

However, the fact is that she was fired for cheating, member harassment and stalking, and gross abuse of authority.

She was banned from the site altogether because the pattern of cheating, member harassment, and stalking continued even after she was fired and no longer had any authority to abuse.

It's mildly dismaying that she went "off the deep end" in such a public and embarrassing manner, but the sensitivity, compassion, fairness, and leniency that Twill and Lack showed to her all throughout her unfortunate mental breakdown and ugly downfall showed them both to be very upstanding gentlemen, as well as being savvy professionals.

They truly made all the right decisions in her case, time after time, right down the line, even while she insanely and spitefully tried very hard to make those decisions very difficult for them.

Thanks, Conquer Club!

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:09 am
by Curmudgeonx
KLOBBER wrote:
Curmudgeonx wrote:I would say that this quote is a mis-statement of the actual facts, re: the use of the phrase "ongoing pattern". The actual administration viewpoint can be found in various threads started by Lack. Anything that someone with a personal vendetta like Klobber says should be taken with a grain of salt.
Okay, so the problem you have with that statement is the use of the phrase "ongoing pattern?"

Fair enough! Here's a revised statement of the facts:

For legal reasons, CC Admin did not disclose personal details of Wicked's dismissal to the general public, and they are to be commended for not disclosing these details.

However, the fact is that she was fired for cheating, member harassment and stalking, and gross abuse of authority.

She was banned from the site altogether because the pattern of cheating, member harassment, and stalking continued even after she was fired and no longer had any authority to abuse.

It's mildly dismaying that she went "off the deep end" in such a public and embarrassing manner, but the sensitivity, compassion, fairness, and leniency that Twill and Lack showed to her all throughout her unfortunate mental breakdown and ugly downfall showed them both to be very upstanding gentlemen, as well as being savvy professionals.

They truly made all the right decisions in her case, time after time, right down the line, even while she insanely and spitefully tried very hard to make those decisions very difficult for them.

Thanks, Conquer Club!

=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>
"insanely" is libelous.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:20 am
by THE KING65
Actually KOBBLERS posts are right on the money.

RIP WICKED. good riddens.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:28 am
by KLOBBER
True, TK65.

Also, in order for a statement to be considered "libelous," it must be both malicious and untrue.

My statement above is neither malicious nor untrue, and so it cannot possibly be considered "libelous."

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:41 am
by Curmudgeonx
KLOBBER wrote:True, TK65.

Also, in order for a statement to be considered "libelous," it must be both malicious and untrue.

My statement above is neither malicious nor untrue, and so it cannot possibly be considered "libelous."

Your statements reek of maliciousness and her mental condition rising to the point of illness (i.e. insane) is unfounded and untrue. Therefore, a false and unprivileged publication in writing of defamatory material. A maliciously written or printed publication which tends to blacken a person's reputation or to expose him to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or to injure him in his business or profession. Corabi v. Curtis Publishing Co. 273 A.2d 899, 904. Malice can be proved on a showing that Defendant published material either knowing it to be false or recklessly without regard as to whether it is true or false. NY Times v. Sullivan 376 US 254.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:44 am
by Optimus Prime
Keep it on track folks......

*This has been a friendly reminder provided by your favorite Loverbot.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:52 am
by THE KING65
Your statements reek of maliciousness and her mental condition rising to the point of illness (i.e. insane) is unfounded and untrue
I have to agree here, since she most likely made up the whole so called "disease" thing in a last ditch effort to save her shitty NON paying job.

Can we stop talking about here now? Shes prolly reading and loving every minute of this. Just let the fat hag die already.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:15 pm
by KLOBBER
Someone asked why she was fired, and I answered the question factually and as sensitively as possible under the circumstances.

So sue me!

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:03 pm
by dancingmastard
The community has spoken.
Re-hire wicked, Lack, there's a good chap.

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:08 pm
by mandalorian2298
dancingmastard wrote:The community has spoken.
Re-hire wicked, Lack, there's a good chap.
Banned for being a multi in 5 4 3..

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:26 pm
by spikeboat
lol. if you think anyone is getting sued for any dumb @ss thing they say on a forum you're crazy...

test...

you are all fat gay cowboys...

<waiting for subpoena>

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:43 pm
by jonesthecurl
mandalorian2298 wrote:
dancingmastard wrote:The community has spoken.
Re-hire wicked, Lack, there's a good chap.
Banned for being a multi in 5 4 3..
that was quick, you didn't even get down to "1".

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:44 pm
by jonesthecurl
Optimus Prime wrote:Keep it on track folks......

*This has been a friendly reminder provided by your favorite Loverbot.
NOt vastly interested, but surely discussing whether the person the thread's about is being libelled is on topic?

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:46 pm
by owenshooter
spikeboat wrote: you are all fat gay cowboys...
that's it, spikeboat... i'm not sending you any more pics!!! i resemble that remark!!!-0

p.s.-who cares about this anymore? it's over!!!! let it go!!!

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:48 pm
by a.sub
spikeboat wrote:lol. if you think anyone is getting sued for any dumb @ss thing they say on a forum you're crazy...

test...

you are all fat gay cowboys...

<waiting for subpoena>
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Image
someone had to do it

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:23 pm
by General Quigley
Thank you, Klobber, for continuing to be a beacon of light, and an oasis of perception in a clouded sea of overly hopeful, horny, prepubescents who think Wicked's cartoon caricature depicts the truth (when we all know that she is really a fat old hag) and who hope to "get lucky" enough to contract an STD from her some day by sticking up for her now in this forum. The only others sticking up for her, I see, are some of her multi's that she still employs to infiltrate the site. I detected some of these multis when playing her in a game a few weeks ago and warned the community then about them.

Your statement is so concisely yet precisely put that I think it bears reposting here. Here is Klobber's thoughtfullyy shared and true summary of reasons for Wicked's dismissal:

"For legal reasons, CC Admin did not disclose personal details of Wicked's dismissal to the general public, and they are to be commended for not disclosing these details.

However, the fact is that she was fired for cheating, member harassment and stalking, and gross abuse of authority.

She was banned from the site altogether because the pattern of cheating, member harassment, and stalking continued even after she was fired and no longer had any authority to abuse.

It's mildly dismaying that she went "off the deep end" in such a public and embarrassing manner, but the sensitivity, compassion, fairness, and leniency that Twill and Lack showed to her all throughout her unfortunate mental breakdown and ugly downfall showed them both to be very upstanding gentlemen, as well as being savvy professionals.

They truly made all the right decisions in her case, time after time, right down the line, even while she insanely and spitefully tried very hard to make those decisions very difficult for them."

For the above mentioned Wicked partisans: to claim Klobber's brilliant post is libelous, meaning malicious and untrue, is ridiculous on the face of it. You should instead be gateful Klobber is willing to do us the public service of offering such a profoundly insightful explanation. He suffered at her hands for quite some time and is in a good position to know the truth. And since when are well-known and well-established "facts" considered to be malicious? Everything in Klobber's statement can be easily proven in the widely available and easily accessed record. Furthermore, calling her "insane" is as factual as it gets. Wicked publicly admitted her insanity in numerous posting herself. In fact, she pleads her insanity as the very reason Conquer Club should give her special considerations. Of course, she constantly claims to be "much better now, thank you." But only a truly facile, naive, twit would believe that. Her behavior has never indicated that such is the case. She even tried to sabotage this site after making the claim that she was indeed so much better. The fact that after asserting she was better that she attempted to sabotage the site should concern us all.

If you are one of the few idiots left trying to defend Wicked's hopelessly compromised honor and care to post further, could you please tell us to which group you belong when you do so that we may more quickly determine your motivation?

Are you a
1) horny prepubescent who hopes to "get lucky" by defending Wicked
2) one of Wicked's multi identities
3) a Gimple who believes anything someone writes, and believes Wicked's own inflated, unsubatantiated rhetoric of how much unpaid "work" she did for this site (funny thing, I don't notice her absence one iota except that there are fewer flames in the forums and more insightful postings instead, like Klobber's)
4) a person who was benefitting from Wicked's cheating by getting on the same team as her, and misses the easy ill-gotten points she garnered you
5) a troll

Thank you for your consideration.

General Quigley

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 1:14 am
by Neoteny
Jeebus, sage this shit!

Re: Regarding wicked (part 3)

Posted: Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:33 am
by Iliad
General Quigley wrote:Thank you, Klobber, for continuing to be a beacon of light, and an oasis of perception in a clouded sea of overly hopeful, horny, prepubescents who think Wicked's cartoon caricature depicts the truth (when we all know that she is really a fat old hag) and who hope to "get lucky" enough to contract an STD from her some day by sticking up for her now in this forum. The only others sticking up for her, I see, are some of her multi's that she still employs to infiltrate the site. I detected some of these multis when playing her in a game a few weeks ago and warned the community then about them.

Your statement is so concisely yet precisely put that I think it bears reposting here. Here is Klobber's thoughtfullyy shared and true summary of reasons for Wicked's dismissal:

"For legal reasons, CC Admin did not disclose personal details of Wicked's dismissal to the general public, and they are to be commended for not disclosing these details.

However, the fact is that she was fired for cheating, member harassment and stalking, and gross abuse of authority.

She was banned from the site altogether because the pattern of cheating, member harassment, and stalking continued even after she was fired and no longer had any authority to abuse.

It's mildly dismaying that she went "off the deep end" in such a public and embarrassing manner, but the sensitivity, compassion, fairness, and leniency that Twill and Lack showed to her all throughout her unfortunate mental breakdown and ugly downfall showed them both to be very upstanding gentlemen, as well as being savvy professionals.

They truly made all the right decisions in her case, time after time, right down the line, even while she insanely and spitefully tried very hard to make those decisions very difficult for them."

For the above mentioned Wicked partisans: to claim Klobber's brilliant post is libelous, meaning malicious and untrue, is ridiculous on the face of it. You should instead be gateful Klobber is willing to do us the public service of offering such a profoundly insightful explanation. He suffered at her hands for quite some time and is in a good position to know the truth. And since when are well-known and well-established "facts" considered to be malicious? Everything in Klobber's statement can be easily proven in the widely available and easily accessed record. Furthermore, calling her "insane" is as factual as it gets. Wicked publicly admitted her insanity in numerous posting herself. In fact, she pleads her insanity as the very reason Conquer Club should give her special considerations. Of course, she constantly claims to be "much better now, thank you." But only a truly facile, naive, twit would believe that. Her behavior has never indicated that such is the case. She even tried to sabotage this site after making the claim that she was indeed so much better. The fact that after asserting she was better that she attempted to sabotage the site should concern us all.

If you are one of the few idiots left trying to defend Wicked's hopelessly compromised honor and care to post further, could you please tell us to which group you belong when you do so that we may more quickly determine your motivation?

Are you a
1) horny prepubescent who hopes to "get lucky" by defending Wicked
2) one of Wicked's multi identities
3) a Gimple who believes anything someone writes, and believes Wicked's own inflated, unsubatantiated rhetoric of how much unpaid "work" she did for this site (funny thing, I don't notice her absence one iota except that there are fewer flames in the forums and more insightful postings instead, like Klobber's)
4) a person who was benefitting from Wicked's cheating by getting on the same team as her, and misses the easy ill-gotten points she garnered you
5) a troll

Thank you for your consideration.

General Quigley
The fact that you started your argument by insulting anyone who does not agree with you ruined your argument. Then again it was an utter shamble anyway.