Conquer Club

hmm i have missed about 100 turns and still have 99% the rounding is ridiculous so really haveing 100% is not that impressive

King_Herpes wrote:

Mr Changsha wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:Is this a thread about how erect you are? If so I'm at about 45% right now. FYI

Can you see it yet?

Only if I don't eat seconds. Do you want to cyber??

With an avatar that symbolises the King of STD's?

Only on the weekends old chap, only on the weekends...

Mr Changsha wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:

Mr Changsha wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:Is this a thread about how erect you are? If so I'm at about 45% right now. FYI

Can you see it yet?

Only if I don't eat seconds. Do you want to cyber??

With an avatar that symbolises the King of STD's?

Only on the weekends old chap, only on the weekends...

Well, looks like I may as well just add Mr. Changsha into my little black book.

King_Herpes wrote:

Mr Changsha wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:

Mr Changsha wrote:

King_Herpes wrote:Is this a thread about how erect you are? If so I'm at about 45% right now. FYI

Can you see it yet?

Only if I don't eat seconds. Do you want to cyber??

With an avatar that symbolises the King of STD's?

Only on the weekends old chap, only on the weekends...

Well, looks like I may as well just add Mr. Changsha into my little black book.

I thought we were talking about Risk, now I'm not so sure...

Oh, you can't kid a kidder. You got me all randy and now you're just gonna play shy?

King_Herpes wrote:Oh, you can't kid a kidder. You got me all randy and now you're just gonna play shy?

1 on 1, Europa, sequential, no cards. I'll send you the game no.

And it's not even a weekend...

Stephen Wayne wrote:hmm i have missed about 100 turns and still have 99% the rounding is ridiculous so really haveing 100% is not that impressive

you don't have 100%, so of course you would say that... those that are failures at maintaining 100% often try to tear those of us down that excel at it... i am shocked at the hater attitude, mr. wayne!!!-0

owenshooter wrote:

Stephen Wayne wrote:hmm i have missed about 100 turns and still have 99% the rounding is ridiculous so really haveing 100% is not that impressive

you don't have 100%, so of course you would say that... those that are failures at maintaining 100% often try to tear those of us down that excel at it... i am shocked at the hater attitude, mr. wayne!!!-0

oh man... now owen's gonna have the naacp get involved because one dude had to try to tear down those with 100% attendance... jesus christo what has CC come to?

btw, i missed another turn... so that means my quest for 100% just took another hit.... damnit

I have 100% turns taken according to my profile. But I have missed a turn on occasion, at least before the feature was implemented.

maybe the # could be just a bit more accurate...
since this rounding thing doesn't truely identify the real 100%'ers...

I'd still be at 100%, but many would drop to 99.x%
while stevie would likely be 98.5%

Robinette wrote:maybe the # could be just a bit more accurate...
since this rounding thing doesn't truely identify the real 100%'ers...

I'd still be at 100%, but many would drop to 99.x%
while stevie would likely be 98.5%

Even so, 99.5% or better is still very good.

owenshooter wrote:yeah, but the percentage doesn't measure "all time", it is kind of like B.C. and A.D.!!! so, you have yet to miss a turn under the new watchful eye of the turn percentage watcher!!-0

You sure about this? I do not believe that this is right. I thought it calculated all time?

lancehoch wrote:

owenshooter wrote:yeah, but the percentage doesn't measure "all time", it is kind of like B.C. and A.D.!!! so, you have yet to miss a turn under the new watchful eye of the turn percentage watcher!!-0

You sure about this? I do not believe that this is right. I thought it calculated all time?

i do not believe so. maybe you could find this out in the mod forum...-0

lancehoch wrote:I was wondering if the turn taken % is for all games ever played or if it is only for games played since this feature was added.

lackattack wrote:For all games

This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

thats crazy maths

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

Well to be precise, to miss a thousand turns would require at least 200,000+ turns taken if the 'decimal' was rounded to the nearest 0.5%. If it was to 0.1% then a player would have had to have taken 1,000,000+ turns for mising 1,000 to not register.

Crazy maths indeed. Sorry Robinette.

Fruitcake wrote:

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

Well to be precise, to miss a thousand turns would require at least 200,000+ turns taken if the 'decimal' was rounded to the nearest 0.5%. If it was to 0.1% then a player would have had to have taken 1,000,000+ turns for mising 1,000 to not register.

Crazy maths indeed. Sorry Robinette.

technically, you're crazier maths fruitcake. either or, that means i've got a long ways to go before i get rounded up to 100%

whitestazn88 wrote:

Fruitcake wrote:

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

Well to be precise, to miss a thousand turns would require at least 200,000+ turns taken if the 'decimal' was rounded to the nearest 0.5%. If it was to 0.1% then a player would have had to have taken 1,000,000+ turns for mising 1,000 to not register.

Crazy maths indeed. Sorry Robinette.

technically, you're crazier maths fruitcake. either or, that means i've got a long ways to go before i get rounded up to 100%

In what way? I am interested. My reckoning is that for 1,000 turns to represent 0.1% then one has to multiply by 1,000 QED, 1 million turns....

i meant crazy maths as in i didn't wanna do the math myself, therefore you were crazy to do it yourself.

whitestazn88 wrote:i meant crazy maths as in i didn't wanna do the math myself, therefore you were crazy to do it yourself.

ahhh...I see....yes I am something of a numbers person I'm afraid. Always been fascinated by them.

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

thats what im saying 100% not impresve

Stephen Wayne wrote:

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

thats what im saying 100% not impresve

but it doesn't mean you can de-rail the thread by berating these players. go make another spam thread.

back to the feat of having 100%, i don't suppose anyone wants to go through all of my games and try to figure out how many turns i have to be perfect in until i get to the mystical mark?

Fruitcake wrote:

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

Well to be precise, to miss a thousand turns would require at least 200,000+ turns taken if the 'decimal' was rounded to the nearest 0.5%. If it was to 0.1% then a player would have had to have taken 1,000,000+ turns for mising 1,000 to not register.

Crazy maths indeed. Sorry Robinette.

All Ya'All are miss'n da point...

Robinette wrote:

Fruitcake wrote:

Robinette wrote:This means that someone who has played 10,000 games could've missed 400+ turns in escalating games and still have 100%...

And if they play flat rate or no cards, where games last way longer that 8 turns... they could have missed THOUSANDS of turns and still have a 100% rating...

I say add a decimal.

Well to be precise, to miss a thousand turns would require at least 200,000+ turns taken if the 'decimal' was rounded to the nearest 0.5%. If it was to 0.1% then a player would have had to have taken 1,000,000+ turns for mising 1,000 to not register.

Crazy maths indeed. Sorry Robinette.

All Ya'All are miss'n da point...

what was the point ma'am?