Conquer Club

nagerous wrote:Divide it by conservatives and liberals and you'll find all the mods are in the first group and all the so-called troublemakers are in the latter.

I'd consider myself a liberative

Ok, than all the liberative winos in one group and beer drinkers in the other.

mafia players + former mafia players (5 games or more)/ Others

mpjh wrote:Ok, than all the liberative winos in one group and beer drinkers in the other.

And all the milk/juice drinkers can take their beakers into the other...

jbrettlip wrote:Robinette, that chrat can't be right.....where are all the Chinese??? Or under their Obama-esque government, do they have to share their penis length equally?

hehee... okay, that deserves a response...

http://www.danwei.org/media_and_adverti ... _penis.php

Today Xinhua's Chinese website published an article titled 'Methods of measuring penis length':


The penis is an important part of the male reproductive organ, and it very important to men. In ancient times, the penis appeared on stone totems expressing the adoration humans feel toward the penis. The size of the penis varies between races and individuals.
The unerect penises of Chinese men (aged 18 to 45) are between 4.5 and 8.8 centimeters (1.6 to 3.5 inches) long, with the average length being 6.5 centimeters (2.5 inches).
The article goes on to give instructions for measuring a penis, and also counsels that men should not worry if their penises are small, but should find appropriate lovemaking methods so that their size does not affect their sex lives.

hehee... did you catch that...
AVERAGE LENGTH 2.5 INCHES
And I heard that China was a BIG country...

***Robinette sits back and waits to see who has good reading comprehension***

Sorry, that's too small an average for GD....moving it over to OT, who might eventually move it to FW depending on how the discussion goes

Robinette wrote: ***Robinette sits back and waits to see who has good reading comprehension***

That's fairly normal for unerect penises

Idiots and me.

the good members and the members who aren't banned

Those who like putting people in boxes and ...me

MrBenn wrote:

nagerous wrote:Divide it by conservatives and liberals and you'll find all the mods are in the first group and all the so-called troublemakers are in the latter.

I'd consider myself a liberative

You say that... but wasn't it you that when the BNP list was leaked, was angry because it was against their right to privacy? Quite a conservative notion... I believe


I miss the days of wicked, I may be the only one to say this but at least there was a bit more objectivity from the mod squad in terms of political leanings. Also, whilst the chat mods and cartographers may well be more liberal in their views, they don't really do much in regards to the forms out of their specialised areas. This recent personal information debacle is showing clear signs of a right-wing bias in the squadron de moderators.

Amazing.....considering the administration has to spend 90% + of its time policing immature punks in our forums, I believe the site is amazingly wonderful. Imagine what would be if this did not have to be the case?

We are here primarily to play war games, yes?

I lol'd.

KoolBak wrote:Amazing.....considering the administration has to spend 90% + of its time policing immature punks in our forums, I believe the site is amazingly wonderful. Imagine what would be if this did not have to be the case?

We are here primarily to play war games, yes?

NO! You don't understand.... they bring it upon themselves...

If they just butted out and let the forums run naturally, the place can be policed by themselves.


Notice, waves of spam and crap only appear after examples of gross misjustices.

First, 4 CCers get perma-banned for posting in a usergroup, when there was no evidence or rules that they should be busted for multis in such an example and this bought with it a wave of spam and crap....

Now, another CCer is banned for a month for posting a phone number when he got told by the user to post it... another example of gross misjustice and particular targetting against someone they see as a "problem member." Once again there was NO RULE that said you cannot post something that another user wants you to post. The fact, that the OP edited his post later, realising his mistake and nothing was done about if for 5 days just adds to the blunders by the moderators. If the mods keep pushing the community this way, there will be a response...... and soon enough there won't be a community any more.

"New rules" are constantly being invented now in order to ban certain users.... no wonder there is such a multi problem here now, with these un-necessary and unexplicable bannings, Moderators like Night Strike are on serious power trips and it is upsetting and breaking down the community. Personally, I think he should step down but that is just my opinion.. but the way the moderators are running the system going back to my original point is like a dictatorship, right wing with rules being invented whenever they feel like it in order to eliminate certain civil disobeyers (famous legendary examples include Gandhi and Luther King) from the state.

While I agree with your sentiment, I can't see DM as gandhi...

jonesthecurl wrote:While I agree with your sentiment, I can't see DM as gandhi...

Heh, maybe not but they were both popularising satyagraha, a form of non-violent resistance. Night Strike and co. responded with duragraha, fear campaigns and propaganda, other soldiers like Curmudgeon and Snorri put on bans.. such 'scare tactics' are not the best way to run a website.

Ok................

KoolBak wrote:Ok................

Because I make an incredibly valid point, you just roll your eyes and say 'ok'? Guess you've got nothing else to say on the topic then??

nagerous wrote:

KoolBak wrote:Ok................

Because I make an incredibly valid point, you just roll your eyes and say 'ok'? Guess you've got nothing else to say on the topic then??

Not to speak for KoolBak, but I think he might be trying to convey that he thinks you're being a bit melodramatic and maudlin in your valid comparisons between CC forum antics and India's struggle for independence from the brutal and oppressive British Empire.

I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes or even get involved. I understand DM was one of your BPB buddies, and you want to defend him.

However, your message does get a bit muddled by the melodramatic and extreme. Perhaps tone it down a bit, and be less confrontational, and you'll get the response you're looking for.

Thanks Dave ;o)

And nagerous....what impresses me the most is your modesty.........

pimpdave wrote:

nagerous wrote:

KoolBak wrote:Ok................

Because I make an incredibly valid point, you just roll your eyes and say 'ok'? Guess you've got nothing else to say on the topic then??

Not to speak for KoolBak, but I think he might be trying to convey that he thinks you're being a bit melodramatic and maudlin in your valid comparisons between CC forum antics and India's struggle for independence from the brutal and oppressive British Empire.

I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes or even get involved. I understand DM was one of your BPB buddies, and you want to defend him.

However, your message does get a bit muddled by the melodramatic and extreme. Perhaps tone it down a bit, and be less confrontational, and you'll get the response you're looking for.

I'm surprised you have taken this stance Pimpdave and made references to what clan I belong to as it is clearly nothing to do with the original point I was making. My message, if you realise the original intent of the thread was to display the difference between conservatives and liberals. I used India's struggle for independence as an example of comparison and was in no way trying to say that they were on the same level ever. At least what I was arguing was not as extreme as the guy earlier who said Hitler was a conservative, Jesus was a liberal, but I didn't hear you call him out on this point....

In a less melodramatic tone, DM is some British guy that frequents this forum, and NightStrike is a total dick that bans him for ridiculous reasons.