Conquer Club

targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot

*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.

I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

jonesthecurl wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot

*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.

I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote: Free meals and parties are life savers for broke college students.

true dat

Please don't ever say dat again...I've heard so much about "who dat?" this year I don't want to ever hear that word again.

who dat der said who dat too much this year?

is seriously considering foeing target for a while.

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that

Maybe the fact that even the best plots if poorly executed make poor movies?

strike wolf wrote:

jonesthecurl wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote: I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...

Truthfully i didn't even find the special effects in that movie to be that great.

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that

Maybe the fact that even the best plots if poorly executed make poor movies?

example star wars. yes but shity plot exctued great is still a worse movie then a great plot exctued baddly

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

jonesthecurl wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote: I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...

Truthfully i didn't even find the special effects in that movie to be that great.

It's like a lot of action movies. Turn off your higher brain functions and you'll find it enjoyable...
i would agee i did not like that movie at all like the first 3 but not that one

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that

Maybe the fact that even the best plots if poorly executed make poor movies?

example star wars. yes but shity plot exctued great is still a worse movie then a great plot exctued baddly

We're gonna have to disagree there. Execution of said plot is just as important as teh plot itself so:

bad plot + great execution=at best a decent movie
Great plot + poor execution=at best a decent movie.

Again you're beef with Star Wars is only the acting. Bad acting alone should not make a movie's quality go down as much as you think it should. The actual plot and execution was good the acting subpar.

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

jonesthecurl wrote:

targetman377 wrote:
To prove that effects can't make a movie all on their own, you just have to see the final Indiana Jones movie...

Truthfully i didn't even find the special effects in that movie to be that great.

It's like a lot of action movies. Turn off your higher brain functions and you'll find it enjoyable...
i would agee i did not like that movie at all like the first 3 but not that one

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot

*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.

I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

AndyDufresne wrote:Like special effects? TRON. Who doesn't love a good 80's sci-fi movie? **Eats a digital banana**


--Andy

Lucarilover240 wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot

*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.

I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:well i hope by the 100th time they redo a plot there exctuion of said plot gets better! but who cares about that

Maybe the fact that even the best plots if poorly executed make poor movies?

example star wars. yes but shity plot exctued great is still a worse movie then a great plot exctued baddly

We're gonna have to disagree there. Execution of said plot is just as important as teh plot itself so:

bad plot + great execution=at best a decent movie
Great plot + poor execution=at best a decent movie.

Again you're beef with Star Wars is only the acting. Bad acting alone should not make a movie's quality go down as much as you think it should. The actual plot and execution was good the acting subpar.

George locus is a horrible director his execution of the plot was crappy. it really did suck seeing how writing and acting go in to the execution of the plot. they are interconnected

targetman377 wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:

targetman377 wrote:i saw crazy heart its a good movie not the best but good acting and plot

*sorry lone wolf there is no special effects.

I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.

last time i checked the ability to spell is a good measure of someone's intelligence. but if you feel that it is i am very sorry for you.

Lucarilover240 wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

strike wolf wrote:
I don't like movies just for special effects. I just think that a few movies have spectacular special effects.

but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.

last time i checked the ability to spell is not a good measure of someone's intelligence. but if you feel that it is i am very sorry for you.

Wait... So, spelling ability is a good measure of someone's intelligence, but if I believe this to be true, then you feel sorry for me? You confuse me, my dear boy.

targetman377 wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:

targetman377 wrote:

Lucarilover240 wrote:

targetman377 wrote: but unlike me no matter how good the special effects are does not make a good movie call me old fashion but for me i feel that special effects are cool in movies but there are too many movies that use special effects way too much. i may just be too smart for all that flashy stuff. don't get me wrong with good actors, a good plot i would love to see special affects but lately it seems like they only care about either a good plot and acting abilities or they go for the special effects shitty acting and worse plot. that's why i did not watch nor will i ever watch AVATAR . that is my position.

He is to intelEegenT for youre speshal affeks.

last time i checked the ability to spell is not a good measure of someone's intelligence. but if you feel that it is i am very sorry for you.

Wait... So, spelling ability is a good measure of someone's intelligence, but if I believe this to be true, then you feel sorry for me? You confuse me, my dear boy.

strike wolf wrote:I was over at the girlfriend's house last night...Before anyone gets excited nothing actually happened which kind of bugs me as I thought she was hinting at having sex and it didn't turn out that way, but no big deal.

AndyDufresne wrote:Like special effects? TRON. Who doesn't love a good 80's sci-fi movie? **Eats a digital banana wearing neon pink parachute pants**


--Andy