Conquer Club

Can we get mod prods for Cblake and sam_levi? and anyone else who hasn't talked today?

sorry, i had to study, a levels and all. anyway, im here now.

wicked wrote:Puff your vote makes you look scummy b/c you gave no legit reason. Me dropping the pressure on a claimed role is pretty standard.... in fact, Tres FOS'd me b/c he thought I didn't. It's obvious anyone who goes after me today after I gift-wrapped Mandy for you is either a noob, most likely in Hound's case, or scum who see me as a threat. Now Puff was just bragging about false claiming in another game, so he doesn't consider himself a noob.

FOS PUFF

You over looked two things in my post

1. I was not bragging that was simply an example of my (and others) theory of HBH

2. I did give a legit reason for voting.

What do you mean by "gift wrapped" mandy unless your saying you killed him.

One more thing, I'm not scum. I don't know if you are but I sure would like to so if you don't mind and enlighten us to whether or not you are that would be great.

Unvotefor now

Like I said, me dropping pressure on Hound b/c he claimed is not a legit reason for voting for me Puff. What real reason do you have for going after me? With Nag, I was the best scum finder yesterday... why on earth would a townie go after either of us after that? They wouldn't, which is why I'm suspicious of you.

Puff wrote:One more thing, I'm not scum. I don't know if you are but I sure would like to so if you don't mind and enlighten us to whether or not you are that would be great.

Brilliant! Why didn't I think of this?? Please everyone, tell us whether or not you're scum!!

For the record, I did not kill Mandy. Did my accusations yesterday lead to his death by a possibile Vig kill? I sure hope so.

Puff seems to be pressing for roles, and if I understood correctly, he was the one to force Nag's role claim yesterday? (Please correct me if I'm wrong). Only scum press for roles Puff...

unvote vote Puff

u asked for roles earlier didnt you though

Wicked, the one who pushed Nag to role-claim is sheep of dumb, which was lynched day 1.


Kernal, I did ask Nag to claim his character name. Sheep had forced him to claim a pro-town power role, and he claimed an investigation upon hitman. We now know Nag isn't lieing as hitman was ineed scum.


By asking the name of his character, since anyway he had claimed his role anyway, we were 1 way ahead top beleive him or prove he was scum. No one counter-claimed, which lead to a scum beeing dead.


And some people should read everything that was said on day 3, a LOT have skimmed a few things.

OK thanks Freezie. I'll leave my vote for now, as I see no reason to unvote.

Puff wrote:What do you mean by "gift wrapped" mandy unless your saying you killed him.

Unvotefor now

As soon as Wicked came into the game, she threw a direct accusation at mandy without any other evidence than the fact she knew his style of play.

That night, he got killed and was proved Mandy was indeed scum. The only accusation against him in the thread was that from wicked. So, if she was scum, she wouldn't have gave mandy away that soon with really no reasons. NO ONE ever came against him before.

good point, she was the one who raised alarm about mandy, so she cant be scum, can she?...

sam_levi_11 wrote:good point, she was the one who raised alarm about mandy, so she cant be scum, can she?...

She can. There could well be more than one scum group, or even just one mafia trying to clear themselves from, suspicion. However, here I don't think wicked is doing that.

Kernal_Kronic wrote:

freezie wrote:

gimpyThewonder wrote:what if mafia#2 tried to kill someone that the doc protected?

Then they are VERY bad. We're almost 100% certain the doc is on Nag's case right now.

Sound as if Freezie is part of the other mafia group...

Are you trying to twist my words there? We know from FIRST DAY that the doc was busy protecting Nagerous because sheep forced him to claim a power-role. Unless we have a second doc, the 'second mafia' would have been stupid to target nagerous.

There is many explications to a 3 deaths from last night ( Vig, SK, 2nd mafia...) second mafia is one of them, and unless we have 2 docs, then I simply said they were bad. I did not imply anything other than that.

Yes, there is a the possibility of two scum groups for sure in a game this big. I just wish I had another good read like I did with Mandy.

The1exile wrote:

sam_levi_11 wrote:good point, she was the one who raised alarm about mandy, so she cant be scum, can she?...

She can. There could well be more than one scum group, or even just one mafia trying to clear themselves from, suspicion. However, here I don't think wicked is doing that.

From now on, Wicked isn't under my suspicion list.<


You're right, mafia could go against each others to clear them from suspicion. But in this case, it's VERY different. Wicked raised a suspicion on Mandy fromk nowhere, I was kinda surprised she did that VERY quickly. And he turned out scum. If she was partner with Mandy, she wouldn't have gave him away that soon.


Now whoever make me say that for the 4th time is getting a slap...

You got no more clues?

vote wicked

I was in another mafia game where there were two mafia....killing the other group was also a requirement. Wicked has led the lines of attack since she came into this game...... FOS freeze for defending xer at every turn.

menace , menace

firth4eva wrote:vote wicked

ooh, this'll be good. Care to explain firth? You do realize you need to explain your votes, right? Is this your first game?

Slap me Freezie!!

The experienced players realize that Free. This game is kinda noob-heavy though, and they're struggling to understand subtle clues. If it's not spelled out in front of them, they don't get it, and often misunderstand.

wicked wrote:

firth4eva wrote:vote wicked

ooh, this'll be good. Care to explain firth? You do realize you need to explain your votes, right? Is this your first game?

there you go again. does everyone who votes for you get this in your other games ?

Hound, open your eyes. Someone who has barely participated comes on and votes with no explanation. Did I vote him, or even FOS him? No. But he does need to give an explanation, and it's everyone's duty to ask. It's obvious he's new to this game.

vote firth

because I can...

that is all for now

Huckleberryhound wrote:

wicked wrote:

firth4eva wrote:vote wicked

ooh, this'll be good. Care to explain firth? You do realize you need to explain your votes, right? Is this your first game?

there you go again. does everyone who votes for you get this in your other games ?

Vote Huckleberryhound For absolutly NO REASONS and without a SINGLE evidence.


Does that make sense to you? I hope not. Why vote at day 3 without explaining why?


Unvote

I don't think wicked is scum although jnd was on my hitlist for scum after the first night, I'm going to review my choice to vote firth in a minute but I would like more of an explanation as opposed to joining in on a bandwagon against wicked. as for HHH I understand why Wicked thought he was scum, he was on the top of my possible scum lists at the end of yesterday but in light of the bus driver revelations that view of mine has dropped

Huckleberryhound wrote:

Vincent M wrote:YouU GuYs NeED TO PaY AttEnTIOn

YoU ScUm BAg

Vote : Mandy

f*ck you

I dug up this gem when searching through the thread, maybe vincent knew something

lol