Page 4 of 8
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:47 pm
by gimil
cairnswk wrote:gimil,,,just a comment on the borders....on the blues and dark red the borders have that white tinge on the outline.
but is does not show the same on the bright red and light green.
is there anything you can do to correct/amend that?
the outerglow is consistant through all the boarders im not really sure what you mean?
cairnswk wrote:also on the north eastern border of chang-yang there is a border line that is visible between the two mountains...perhaps just another mountain in there to cover that border would be appropriate?
yeah thats already fixed

Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2007 2:59 pm
by KingPrime
gimil wrote:KingPrime wrote:this map isn't that accurate, i play loads on games based on the three kingdoms era, but still, gimil, another great map, well done.
there is many inaccuracies with the historie of this era. I have done best what i can with what is available to me while still making the map enjoyable.
considering all the changes of borders over the 3 kingdoms era, this is great, but i agree that you need to include some places like huo lio gate, (forget how to spell it) since this is where they joined forces to kill a traitor to the Han, and battled the assumed strongest warrior of the of the time here, LU Bu.
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:32 pm
by sam_levi_11
I WANYTED THIS MAP FOR AGES...I LOVE YOU
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:01 pm
by gimil
sam_levi_11 wrote:I WANYTED THIS MAP FOR AGES...I LOVE YOU
i love you to

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:20 pm
by sam_levi_11
group hug
btw...i have lots of info on this era...read the book, seen the websites, plated the games and all sorts if u need help. also many of the areas have different names than suposed to...
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 1:23 pm
by gimil
sam_levi_11 wrote:group hug
btw...i have lots of info on this era...read the book, seen the websites, plated the games and all sorts if u need help. also many of the areas have different names than suposed to...
well i did alot less research, so if youd liek to help give me a list of name changes to make the map more accurate
never know i might even give you credit for it

Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 4:43 pm
by sam_levi_11
gimil wrote:Here you go guys the long awaited:

okay well....the most north western continent is properly called xi liang.
chang yang is yong an
you continent is bei ping
nan hai is han hai
he fei is where u have jian ye
jian ye is where u have chien an i think(not sure on this one
the one above xu is called ben hai
xu is xia pi
xu chang is where yu is
chang an is where yong or si is, again maybe muy thai guy can help.
central wei shpild be worth 7 as it was historically very hard t take over and cao cao just mde it look easy.
tian shui is where wu tu and pha si is i think.
jin yang is where bing is
pai yai and chiao is where the nanman kingdom was, when shu took it over they joined so make that a separate continant under shu maybe worth 2. then split yue sui up, this new continent shopuld be worth 3. yong an can be the north part and keep the name for the south part. also the name for north yi is riverlands.
thats all i have at the moment....
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:22 am
by iancanton
gimil
looks good so far, on a period that isn't the easiest to research. for the benefit of those of us who are either history buffs or archaeologists, can u change the dates to read AD 220-280 (few other people are likely to notice)?
ian.

Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:58 am
by sam_levi_11
i dunno if i said but hang sha is chang sha..
u see ur using thr right names...but the wrong version...ur using wade-giles...we want pinyin
ill get them all done properly soon. me and a few freinds are working on it
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:02 am
by gimil
sam_levi_11 wrote:i dunno if i said but hang sha is chang sha..
u see ur using thr right names...but the wrong version...ur using wade-giles...we want pinyin
ill get them all done properly soon. me and a few freinds are working on it
excellent much appreciated sami
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:02 am
by gimil
iancanton wrote:gimil
looks good so far, on a period that isn't the easiest to research. for the benefit of those of us who are either history buffs or archaeologists, can u change the dates to read AD 220-280 (few other people are likely to notice)?
ian.

yes i shall do that for you friend
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:25 am
by sam_levi_11
just hope u can do all the things i said at the top
hi
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:44 pm
by WL_southerner
looks good how many players do you think would be the right number for this map
i like it really good map and lay out
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:50 pm
by unriggable
I suggest you remove the mountains between pa-tunh and wei jing.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:56 pm
by sam_levi_11
wei jing is jei ting
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:57 pm
by sam_levi_11
unriggable wrote:I suggest you remove the mountains between pa-tunh and wei jing.
we are going for realism
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:01 pm
by sam_levi_11
okay, more info....pa hsi is tian shui
ling ling is jiang ling
si is chang an
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:00 pm
by gimil
sam_levi_11 wrote:okay, more info....pa hsi is tian shui
ling ling is jiang ling
si is chang an
SAM can you please just make it one big update with all the changes and have them categorised under continents. And ill do them in the one big update
Re: hi
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:52 pm
by jako
WL_southerner wrote:looks good how many players do you think would be the right number for this map
i like it really good map and lay out
southy, i thought the title would have been sef-explanatory. ie 3 players for the 3 kingdoms
but 4 is much more likely.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:56 pm
by gimil
i need feedback on hte bonuses guys, i had to tweek alot from the spreadsheet version to suit the gameplay layout.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:31 pm
by jako
personally i think ur bonuses are good. very reasonable. but there is a chance someone could get all of you or liang in a drop which isnt all that unlikely.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:37 pm
by gimil
jako wrote:personally i think ur bonuses are good. very reasonable. but there is a chance someone could get all of you or liang in a drop which isnt all that unlikely.
thats why i pushed hte small bonuses to 1
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:41 pm
by jako
gimil wrote:jako wrote:personally i think ur bonuses are good. very reasonable. but there is a chance someone could get all of you or liang in a drop which isnt all that unlikely.
thats why i pushed hte small bonuses to 1
missed that somehow
im good then. ur bonuses are fine.
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:16 pm
by Genghis Khant
gimil wrote:
I like this a lot. I look forward to playing on it.
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:25 pm
by sam_levi_11
fuk where has my post gopne....i did it all in order....
ARGH HOLY MOTHER FUKER I YOU ALL AND EVERYTHING....now where was i
ill do it in a minute gimil, saturday night(gmt) i will do it again