Conquer Club

Der Fuhrer wrote:

jiminski wrote:Are you French Canadian?

What's a 'French-Canadian'?

Der Fuhrer wrote:
No one can be this stupid. With this post, you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a commie-pinko commie libtard.

From the beginning of the 20th century until the 1970s, the French Revolution was most commonly described as the result of the growing economic and social importance of the bourgeoisie, or middle class. The bourgeoisie, it was believed, overthrew the Old Regime because that regime had given power and privilege to other classes—the nobility and the clergy—who prevented the bourgeoisie from advancing socially and politically. Recently this interpretation has been replaced by one that relies less on social and economic factors and more on political ones. Economic recession in the 1770s may have frustrated some bourgeois in their rise to power and wealth, and rising bread prices just before the Revolution certainly increased discontent among workers and peasants. Yet it is now commonly believed that the revolutionary process started with a crisis in the French state.

By 1789 many French people had become critical of the monarchy, even though it had been largely successful in militarily defending France and in quelling domestic religious and political violence. They resented the rising and unequal taxes, the persecution of religious minorities, and government interference in their private lives. These resentments, coupled with an inefficient government and an antiquated legal system, made the government seem increasingly illegitimate to the French people. The royal court at Versailles, which had been developed to impress the French people and Europe generally, came to symbolize the waste and corruption of the entire Old Regime.

I absolutely abhor fucking morons. The entire revolution was against the monarchy. It had nothing to do with a battle between the rich and poor.

Der Fuhrer wrote:

browng-08 wrote:

Der Fuhrer wrote: I pwn a fucker, yet all that concerns you would be my text colour? I did not forget my text colour. I forgot to bold the most-important components of my source information, that you moronic liberals may better understand my obviously superior knowledge.

How did you 'pwn' me (pwn, really? go back to counter strike, dipshit), by not understanding my post?

Counter Strike? WTF? No matter. Nice backpedal by the way.

wikipedia wrote:Pwn is a slang term that implies domination or humiliation of a rival, used primarily in the Internet gaming culture to taunt an opponent that has just been soundly defeated. For example: I pwn noobs on halo 3.

ignotus wrote:

Der Fuhrer wrote:
No one can be this stupid. With this post, you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are a commie-pinko commie libtard.

From the beginning of the 20th century until the 1970s, the French Revolution was most commonly described as the result of the growing economic and social importance of the bourgeoisie, or middle class. The bourgeoisie, it was believed, overthrew the Old Regime because that regime had given power and privilege to other classes—the nobility and the clergy—who prevented the bourgeoisie from advancing socially and politically. Recently this interpretation has been replaced by one that relies less on social and economic factors and more on political ones. Economic recession in the 1770s may have frustrated some bourgeois in their rise to power and wealth, and rising bread prices just before the Revolution certainly increased discontent among workers and peasants. Yet it is now commonly believed that the revolutionary process started with a crisis in the French state.

By 1789 many French people had become critical of the monarchy, even though it had been largely successful in militarily defending France and in quelling domestic religious and political violence. They resented the rising and unequal taxes, the persecution of religious minorities, and government interference in their private lives. These resentments, coupled with an inefficient government and an antiquated legal system, made the government seem increasingly illegitimate to the French people. The royal court at Versailles, which had been developed to impress the French people and Europe generally, came to symbolize the waste and corruption of the entire Old Regime.

I absolutely abhor fucking morons. The entire revolution was against the monarchy. It had nothing to do with a battle between the rich and poor.

So the whole thing (French revolution) was just a battle against the monarchy? Not likely! I could put some 50 random quotes right now but I will point a flaw in this perception by pointing to two facts?

1) Revolution started in mid 1789, but they executed king (Luis XVI) in 1793. And National Convention sentenced him to death with only a few votes more (in favor of his death). Why didn't they killed the king earlier if the people hated him that much (he was in Paris most of that time)?

2) Revolution started in mid 1789, but the republic was declared only in mid 1792. So if monarchy was so bad for the people why did they wait three years to declare republic?

The National Convention
National Convention (France), representative assembly convened (September 1792) during the French Revolution. It abolished the monarchy, established the First Republic, and condemned (January 1793) King Louis XVI to death for treason. During the Reign of Terror (April 1793-July 1794), the convention was dominated by the 12-member Committee of Public Safety and thereafter by the Thermidorian faction. The convention was dissolved October 26, 1795, after the establishment of the Directory.

got tonkaed wrote:i like the girls chances in that one really, she looks pissed.

browng-08 wrote:I bet the horse uses red text. He'll win.

browng-08 wrote:

Der Fuhrer wrote:

jiminski wrote:Are you French Canadian?

What's a 'French-Canadian'?

Means from Quebec.

jay_a2j wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:So I read about Communism in school yesterday, and I think it's the most retarded idea I've ever heard of. I go to work but then pay my dumb neighbour most of my money, because he's too stupid/lazy to work, wtf?!

I see a lot of people around here saying that communism/socialism isn't that bad. But how can you even be serious? It's just like being robbed every day.

Am I missing something, or is communism just the most retarded thing to ever grace the planet.

I agree, vote Ron Paul!

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

ignotus wrote:

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No!

Dancing Mustard wrote:

ignotus wrote:

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No!

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.

Dancing Mustard wrote:

ignotus wrote:

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No!

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.

btownmeggy wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:

ignotus wrote:

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No!

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.

This post may be worthy of me finally creating a signature.

btownmeggy wrote:

btownmeggy wrote:

Dancing Mustard wrote:

ignotus wrote:

Guiscard wrote:Is DM not being perhaps a little ironic in this thread?

No!

Shut up, I am being deadly fucking serious and this thread is a serious business! Communism is worse than AIDs and I have seen nothing to convince me otherwise. f*ck it, maybe even as bad as SARs with cancer at the same time.

All of you commies are going to hell for believing in a retarded sin which is also a sin and is wrong.

There have been all of no valid arguments as to why communism does not suck, and so I do not believe that it doesn't. End of.

This post may be worthy of me finally creating a signature.

Even if he his joking, it's a good one.

Ta-da!

|
|
V