Conquer Club

I am town and, as you may have guessed, I have an investigative role, and it isn't cop. That's as much as I feel the need to say for now. If I get a bunch of votes, I'll make a full claim.

I know you're new, but that doesn't explain your mistake. Your role name always is very clear, no matter how new you are. The word 'target' will never be used in such a way that even a newbie can mistake it for his role name.

24 hours left.

( people who havsn't contributed will be prodded).

I would like to record for posterity that Clive has been on the forums several times, but he never took the time to explain what he did with Muy_Thaiguy and how it would be possible that he is not linked to his (MTG's) death, although he's (C) the only one who ever came near him (MTG).

I don't want to claim unnecessessarily.

InkL0sed wrote:OK a lot seems to have happened, I will post shortly once I've caught up.

Vote InkL0sed Why did you kill sam?

Vote Count



suggs 10- /, InkL0sed, kernal kronic, diddle, kiwitaker, kalishnikov, baggins994, browng-08, clive, snorri1234.

InkL0sed 6- suggs, timmytuttut, *secret*, spurgistan, mandyb, militant

22 players, 12 to lynch

Unvote.

I'm going to wait for either InkL0sed or Clive to roleclaim.

Vote Count



suggs 9- /, InkL0sed, kernal kronic, diddle, kiwitaker, kalishnikov, baggins994, browng-08, clive.

InkL0sed 6- suggs, timmytuttut, *secret*, spurgistan, mandyb, militant

22 players, 12 to lynch

Why do you want me to roleclaim?

Clive wrote:Why do you want me to roleclaim?

Koesen says you have something to do with MTG's death. I want an explanation of that.

Snorri1234 wrote:

Clive wrote:Why do you want me to roleclaim?

Koesen says you have something to do with MTG's death. I want an explanation of that.

Well I can't explain why he died, I did not kill him. Although I did visit MTG.

The killer must be "invisible" to koesen, or he is not completely reliable, or something along those lines.

OK – sorry for the inactivity for the past 12 or so hours, but I can't be online all the time, you know

Anyway, I am indeed a vigilante, of sorts. I had three bullets, and used my first on Sam, because I didn't like the blatant bandwagoning (to the point where he was bandwagoning after almost getting lynched for doing just that). I thought there was a pretty good chance he would be a bandit or mafia. I do regret that Sam was a townie, but at least his role doesn't seem to have been incredibly important.

Now, on to suggs. At this point, I am convinced he is mafia. It's either him or KiwiTaker, but KiwiTaker roleclaimed right away, and generally seemed pretty innocent to me. But suggs on the other hand, made up (I think, anyway) a bogus role which allowed him to point the finger at me. Besides the general scummy vibe that gives, consider this: why would william18 give three suspects, two of which are able to say that I am the killer? That doesn't seem logical to me. But then, I am new to mafia, so maybe I'm wrong.

I would also like to add that suggs' explanation for his mistake doesn't satisfy me at all. Also, the way he voted for me at first (just basically voting and saying nothing else), seems like an attempt to keep his head down for the time being.

Not to mention that suggs has been suspected before in this game.

Since there's a lot of confusion now, I'll claim and explain my actions.

I am Liara, a Forensic Investigator. I don't actually do anything, but when people die, I get a list of the people they were visited by since day one. The list doesn't say which of these people killed the victim, but if the victim was visited by only one person ever, the conclusion seems clear.

According to my information:

- Lalaland was visited by 'mafia'. No names were given, even though I told William18 I thought the nature of my role should mean I got names, rather than 'mafia'.

- Sam_levi was visited by Kiwitaker, Inkl0sed and Suggs

- Muy_Thaiguy was visited by Clive.

I didn't receive any information about Skoffin, though I asked for it. No explanation was given.

I find the possibility of invisible killers very unlikely. Thus, I firmly believe Clive killed MTG. What I am less sure of, is why he did it. His denial makes him look suspicious in my eyes.

What I think of Suggs is fairly clear, I think It's either him or Inkl0sed, I believe.

Nevermind.

Fastposted by Inkl0sed. That seems to clear suggs of Sam's death, though I wonder if I caught scum by accident. Suggs' slip up still sounds suspicious.

Nonetheless, under the circumstances, I think it's best to switch my vote to Clive. Maybe our tracker can keep an eye on suggs?

unvote. Vote Clive

Vote Count



suggs 9- /, InkL0sed, kernal kronic, diddle, kiwitaker, kalishnikov, baggins994, browng-08, clive.

InkL0sed 6- suggs, timmytuttut, *secret*, spurgistan, mandyb, militant

Clive 1- Koesen

22 players, 12 to lynch

InkL0sed wrote: Now, on to suggs. At this point, I am convinced he is mafia. It's either him or KiwiTaker,

If you killed Sam, then why is either Kiwi or suggs mafia? Your confession pretty much clears both of them, or at least casts a big doubt on the evidence against either one.

Koesen wrote:

InkL0sed wrote: Now, on to suggs. At this point, I am convinced he is mafia. It's either him or KiwiTaker,

If you killed Sam, then why is either Kiwi or suggs mafia? Your confession pretty much clears both of them, or at least casts a big doubt on the evidence against either one.

Indeed. I'm beginning to wonder if there are any mafia at all here...

Snorri1234 wrote:

Koesen wrote:

InkL0sed wrote: Now, on to suggs. At this point, I am convinced he is mafia. It's either him or KiwiTaker,

If you killed Sam, then why is either Kiwi or suggs mafia? Your confession pretty much clears both of them, or at least casts a big doubt on the evidence against either one.

Indeed. I'm beginning to wonder if there are any mafia at all here...

I misunderstood how your investigation worked. So that claim is basically invalidated.

I didn't know the way you concluded it was one of us three was by knowing who "visited" Sam that night. I thought william just told you that for some reason.

William told me you three, and nobody else, visited Sam. He was murdered, thus one of you three must be the killer. I didn't say the killer had to be mafia.

Koesen wrote:William told me you three, and nobody else, visited Sam. He was murdered, thus one of you three must be the killer. I didn't say the killer had to be mafia.

I know that now, but I didn't when I made the post in which I said either suggs or kiwi was mafia.

ah so town has one kill, bandits one kill, mafia one kill, makes sense to me
Unvote.
Though it seems the bandit killer is likely invisible, which would make it unlikely clive is the killer.

Vote Count



suggs 8- InkL0sed, kernal kronic, diddle, kiwitaker, kalishnikov, baggins994, browng-08, clive.

InkL0sed 6- suggs, timmytuttut, *secret*, spurgistan, mandyb, militant

Clive 1- Koesen

22 players, 12 to lynch

unvote

this is what i think

suggs:his role sounds like BS, but for some reason i believe him.

inkl0sed:His role claim seems believable.

Clive:todays lynch since hes the only other option

vote clive

Vote Clive.

Weakest explanation ever. "I didn't do it, the killer must be invisible!"