Re: COLLEGE FOOTBALL
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:17 pm
After a rough start, the game is going heavily in Utah's favor.
Utah 17
Cal 14
Utah 17
Cal 14
Conquer Club, a free online multiplayer variation of a popular world domination board game.
https://beta.conquerclub.com/forum/
hes an amazing talent, but I just dont see how you can give him or even Gerhardt the nod over other candidates that lead their teams to a perfect regular season...Woodruff wrote:He really should have won the Heisman.oVo wrote:Suh is the first defensive player to be named AP Player of the Year.
The Heisman isn't a team award, so the team's record should be irrelevant to it. In fact, if anything, I would suggest that a team's record should be held AGAINST a player if it's that good because perhaps the player wouldn't really be that outstanding without the strength of his teammates around him. In other words, a stronger team means the individual has to do less to stand out.king sam wrote:hes an amazing talent, but I just dont see how you can give him or even Gerhardt the nod over other candidates that lead their teams to a perfect regular season...Woodruff wrote:He really should have won the Heisman.oVo wrote:Suh is the first defensive player to be named AP Player of the Year.
Definitely one way of seeing it. But the way I see it is, this player that we award the overall most talented player of the year goes to the single player that helped lead his team to heights in which were unattainable without him, and the whole team rose to perfection from the benefit of playing alongside of him. Hence a guy who's team went 12-0 or 11 -1, not 9-3 and a loss in the conference championship..Woodruff wrote:The Heisman isn't a team award, so the team's record should be irrelevant to it. In fact, if anything, I would suggest that a team's record should be held AGAINST a player if it's that good because perhaps the player wouldn't really be that outstanding without the strength of his teammates around him. In other words, a stronger team means the individual has to do less to stand out.
hawkeye is leading right now with a total prediction of 3 right and 1 wrong.king sam wrote:if anyone wants to do a bowl pick em I created a group on the ESPN site so we can all do it together and see whos predictions are the most accurate.
Heres the link:
http://games.espn.go.com/bowlmania/en/frontpage
make an account with ESPN if you dont already have one
Then your in, select your name and make your picks.
- once you get there select "my groups"
- then create/join a group
- In the search box type in the league name Conquer Club
- Password is CC Pick em
Good Luck
Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!king sam wrote:hawkeye is leading right now with a total prediction of 3 right and 1 wrong.king sam wrote:if anyone wants to do a bowl pick em I created a group on the ESPN site so we can all do it together and see whos predictions are the most accurate.
Heres the link:
http://games.espn.go.com/bowlmania/en/frontpage
make an account with ESPN if you dont already have one
Then your in, select your name and make your picks.
- once you get there select "my groups"
- then create/join a group
- In the search box type in the league name Conquer Club
- Password is CC Pick em
Good Luck
Seems the Middle Tenn game gave everyone fits, as no one predicted that one right
Hopefully I picked my upsets right.. i still feel confident in my picks, and I changed my Wyoming pick to Fresno like a day before the game, serves me right.TheMissionary wrote: Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.
king sam wrote:Hopefully I picked my upsets right.. i still feel confident in my picks, and I changed my Wyoming pick to Fresno like a day before the game, serves me right.TheMissionary wrote: Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.
Bowl Tallies so far wrote:Mountain West 3-0
Big East _ 2-0
Sun Belt _ 1-0
C-USA _ 2-2
PAC 10 _ 1-2
MAC _ 0-1
ACC _ 0-2
WAC _ _0-2
SEC _ _ 0-0
Big Ten _ 0-0
Big 12 _ 0-0
I ALMOST changed my Nevada pick to SMU, because of the two big rushers being out. Then I thought...sure, June Jones is there, but it's SM-freaking-U and kept it the same. Oh, and I had a confidence of 30 on it (which I DEFINITELY should have had the sense to change, regardless). Dammit.king sam wrote:Hopefully I picked my upsets right.. i still feel confident in my picks, and I changed my Wyoming pick to Fresno like a day before the game, serves me right.TheMissionary wrote: Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.
Yeah I had my doubts with Nevada too, then end of first quarter I was like 'WHAT THE HELL!" So much for 5-1 huh?Woodruff wrote:I ALMOST changed my Nevada pick to SMU, because of the two big rushers being out. Then I thought...sure, June Jones is there, but it's SM-freaking-U and kept it the same. Oh, and I had a confidence of 30 on it (which I DEFINITELY should have had the sense to change, regardless). Dammit.king sam wrote:Hopefully I picked my upsets right.. i still feel confident in my picks, and I changed my Wyoming pick to Fresno like a day before the game, serves me right.TheMissionary wrote: Thank you Thank you. I seem to be the only one who picked Wyoming to win. Criticize my thinking now men!![]()
Still lots of games left, should be close in the end. Although I won last year as well.
A couple of agreements across the board on the MWC board are;strike wolf wrote:SMU blew out Nevada? wasn't this the necxt best tem after Boise in the WAC? OR am I mistaken. Either way this bowl season isn't loolking good so far for the wac. course it isn't looking too good for the PAC 10 either.
Nevada was definitely a good team. They were the first team in NCAA Division 1 history to have three 1000 yard rushers in the same season. Unfortunately, two of those 1000 yard rushers did not play in this game (one with injury and one with academic problems). I'm not sure it would have won them the game (their defense had to show up for that to happen), but it would have made the game a lot closer.strike wolf wrote:SMU blew out Nevada? wasn't this the necxt best tem after Boise in the WAC? OR am I mistaken. Either way this bowl season isn't loolking good so far for the wac. course it isn't looking too good for the PAC 10 either.
I went Carolina, My #2 team.oVo wrote:Ohio U. is trying to make a game of it. Starting with a goal line stand to end the first half... they've come back from 21 down. A blocked a punt just led to a FG making it 21-17 in the 3rd quarter...
but Marshall --held scoreless in the second half-- hangs on to win it.
So did you go with Pitt's offense or Carolina's defense?
Pittsburgh 19 North Carolina 17 Final
Pitt drove 79 yards in 16 plays burning 8:43 off of the clock to take the lead with 0:56 left.
Pitt had 4th & 2 on the UNC 30 with 1:55 to play and the Tarheel D gave away a 1st down with an offsides call.
Bowl Record by Conference wrote:Mountain West 3-0
Big East _ 2-0
Big Ten _ 1-0
Sun Belt _ 1-0
C-USA _ 2-2
PAC 10 _ 2-2
SEC _ 1-1
ACC _ 1-3
Big 12 _ 0-1
MAC _ 0-2
WAC _ 0-2