Conquer Club

Yes, I see it

L M S wrote:

posting once again

ViperOverLord wrote:

cyrenius wrote:

ViperOverLord wrote:

Don't see why you need paperbags. I gues your Prince Charming, oh no, wait I got it, you don't want to see the disapointment on their face understandeble

Meh. I'll admit they're pretty good but I think you're taking your dp's a little too seriously fella.

I don't get attitudes like SandyOverlord's. We know he isn't hot shit nor a Smooth Operator, and that if he ever could talk with a girl like one of those above then he cum in his pants after 10 seconds.

GabonX wrote:

If you murder someone, don't ever tell anyone.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inception_ ... #Reception

john9blue wrote:

None of those criticisms had to do with a lack of understanding. Dislike.

InkL0sed wrote:

john9blue wrote:

None of those criticisms had to do with a lack of understanding. Dislike.

Also, those criticisms are actually quite fair. The movie wasn't that brilliant, it was just very entertaining. It's a rollercoaster ride, not an insightful article about philosophy.

I just saw the title to that Demot...

I hope that's not a spoiler, but I didn't read it anyway. Still haven't seen it, but want to, badly.

I just found it unusual that all the listed negative reviews came from New York. Other than that the reviews were almost universally positive. I have a hard spot for critics anyway; I value far more the ones who create instead of the ones that judge the creations of others (although they do have a role I suppose).

You should see it AOG. Snorri's right, the philosophy isn't anything you wouldn't find in Phil 101, but it pays to be attentive because the plot can get ahead of you.

john9blue wrote:I just found it unusual that all the listed negative reviews came from New York. Other than that the reviews were almost universally positive. I have a hard spot for critics anyway; I value far more the ones who create instead of the ones that judge the creations of others (although they do have a role I suppose).

You should see it AOG. Snorri's right, the philosophy isn't anything you wouldn't find in Phil 101, but it pays to be attentive because the plot can get ahead of you.

Oh yes everyone should see it, it's awesomes. While I said it wasn't brilliant it's probably the most thoughtprovoking blockbuster ever. First time I've seen people gather outside after the movie and discuss the whole thing. I'm pretty sure that even the critics were all like "Wow, awesome" during the movie and only dissed it the next day when they had to write about it.

f*ck YOU GUYS!

I wanted to see it before it even came out. I just haven't had the time and thanks to the shitty theater that's in my town, the showings never line up with when I'm free.

Tomorrow, hopefully...

WOO!

Saw it. It was great...

Ink, not taht I feel like arguing a demotivational poster's legitimacy, but I could see how someone who doesn't understand a movie could think lowly of it.

It was massively thought provoking and had a sort of epicness to it...

That isn't to say it had a lot of holes in the story (to me at least).

I'd really like to see someone make a ytmnd of the movie Casino Royale with Daniel Craig as Bond.
It starts off showing James Bond with the drink that was poisoned during the Texas Hold 'em game.
Then it shows him slowly getting fucked up by the poison.
After Vesper saves James, James mutters... "It was stirred."

Maugena wrote:I'd really like to see someone make a ytmnd of the movie Casino Royale with Daniel Craig as Bond.
It starts off showing James Bond with the drink that was poisoned during the Texas Hold 'em game.
Then it shows him slowly getting fucked up by the poison.
After Vesper saves James, James mutters... "It was stirred."

Seconded.