Page 1 of 1
3 against 1 [closed]
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:23 am
by dinamo
Game 5714944
What can i say...i have to play against 3 player?
that really sucks
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:34 am
by e_i_pi
You're kidding, right?
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:03 am
by ronsizzle
im going to start advertising this site in preschools across ohio and bordering states...
will there ever be warnings for frivolous complaints?
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:35 am
by jefjef
Yep I was in this game once and my opponents attacked me. WTF! It just aint right.
They should be warned for trying not to lose.
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:27 am
by dinamo
e_i_pi wrote:You're kidding, right?
not at all...
those 3 guys dont attact each other...check game and you will know what i am talking about...
he defence his land with 1 army..hehe
nice
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:56 am
by Aalmeida17
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:02 pm
by dinamo
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 1:05 pm
by finchboy
dinamo wrote:Game 5714944
What can i say...i have to play against 3 player?
that really sucks
dinamo, when you get into a dominate position in a game, the players, not wanting to lose, hack away at the leader so they all have shot a winning again. It's not against the rules, its just good play. If you want to read up on late to mid-game flat-rate strategy you might look
here
everyone else, there's no need to be nasty to noobs who don't know they're way around the site.
F
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 2:49 pm
by dinamo
finchboy *
oke oke
never mind...
admin plz close this topic...
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:30 pm
by darkangelsguy205
there going after you because your really weak
Re: 3 against 1
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 3:48 pm
by Evil Semp
This is closed per the OP's request.