Page 1 of 2
Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:16 pm
by Symmetry
Unashamedly Indie, I'm liking Peter Gabriel's cover of Flume by Bon Iver's Flume:
FlumeNo points for pointing out All along the Watchtower, but yeah, Hurt sung by Johnny Cash still makes NIN sound like whiny teenagers.
Edit-
I forgot add Vampire Weekend covering Exit Music for a Film:
Exit MusicNot a lot of covers find a balance between a new take and faith to the original. VW stick a bit too close to the original, but the beats improve the song so I'm on the side of the cover.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:28 pm
by mgconstruction
A little to get this thing started, great topic!
I went here to jog the memory for some songs and not only found a few I love but quite a few I never new were covers.
http://digitaldreamdoor.nutsie.com/page ... songs.htmlTears for fears - Shout < by Disturbed - Shout 2000
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTPFlwZ6gmIBob Seger - Turn the page < Metallica
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dOibtqWo6z4Whiskey in the Jar - The Dubliners < Metallica
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIh3nO6-V_ABlack Magic woman - Fleetwood Mac < Santana
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymh1o09vRWEBlinded By The Light - Bruce Springsteen < Manfred Mann's Earth Band - Never new this was a cover
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eg8cDmi7-U8Signs - Five Man Electical Band < Tesla
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0tu_4Y_b_w
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:33 pm
by mgconstruction
Simple Man - Lynyrd Skynyrd - Shinedown - Not better than original but different with a twist. Love both versions
http://www.youtube.com/user/shinedowntv ... bN99f9esS4The Man Who Sold The World - David Bowie < Nirvana
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fregObNcHC8
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:25 am
by PLAYER57832
I'm Dating myself, but I always like Wierd Al.
Of course, I'm not sure parady is really what you are asking about..
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:28 am
by JOHNNYROCKET24
any remake of a Beatles song is better than the original
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:10 pm
by kevusher
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:any remake of a Beatles song is better than the original
...except Yesterday, in which case they're all equally bad by default.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 1:14 pm
by F1fth
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:any remake of a Bob Dylan song is better than the original
Fixed it for you. Seriously though, the only cover that comes close to a Beatles song is "With a little help from my friends" by Joe Cocker (the intro theme to the show "The Wonder Years" if you remember it).
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:33 pm
by mgconstruction
kevusher wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:any remake of a Beatles song is better than the original
...except Yesterday, in which case they're all equally bad by default.
I beg to differ, Guns & Roses did a cover of that song I think is pretty good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5QHBZrDLvc
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:41 pm
by Symmetry
mgconstruction wrote:kevusher wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:any remake of a Beatles song is better than the original
...except Yesterday, in which case they're all equally bad by default.
I beg to differ, Guns & Roses did a cover of that song I think is pretty good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5QHBZrDLvc
That's, erm, not a cover. Although it is kind of a cover of Sweet Child, but most Guns & Roses stuff ends up like that for me.
I can't agree with the Beatles covers, that's just showing poor taste. As for Bob, well that's a given in a lot of cases. Awesome songwriter, poor performer until you get to know him. Even then it's a coin toss.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:55 pm
by Timminz
F1fth wrote:Seriously though, the only cover that comes close to a Beatles song is "With a little help from my friends" by Joe Cocker.
Indeed! That version of that song is always the first to pop into my head when considering covers that were better than the original.
The second, is always the White Stripe's version of Dolly Parton's
Jolene.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:59 pm
by mgconstruction
Timminz wrote:F1fth wrote:Seriously though, the only cover that comes close to a Beatles song is "With a little help from my friends" by Joe Cocker.
The second, is always the White Stripe's version of Dolly Parton's
Jolene.
I forgot about that one, def better

Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:02 pm
by mgconstruction
Symmetry wrote:mgconstruction wrote:kevusher wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:any remake of a Beatles song is better than the original
...except Yesterday, in which case they're all equally bad by default.
I beg to differ, Guns & Roses did a cover of that song I think is pretty good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5QHBZrDLvc
That's, erm, not a cover. Although it is kind of a cover of Sweet Child, but most Guns & Roses stuff ends up like that for me.
I can't agree with the Beatles covers, that's just showing poor taste. As for Bob, well that's a given in a lot of cases. Awesome songwriter, poor performer until you get to know him. Even then it's a coin toss.
Correct, I have no idea why I thought that was a cover

Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:10 pm
by Symmetry
mgconstruction wrote:Symmetry wrote:mgconstruction wrote:kevusher wrote:JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:any remake of a Beatles song is better than the original
...except Yesterday, in which case they're all equally bad by default.
I beg to differ, Guns & Roses did a cover of that song I think is pretty good.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5QHBZrDLvc
That's, erm, not a cover. Although it is kind of a cover of Sweet Child, but most Guns & Roses stuff ends up like that for me.
I can't agree with the Beatles covers, that's just showing poor taste. As for Bob, well that's a given in a lot of cases. Awesome songwriter, poor performer until you get to know him. Even then it's a coin toss.
Correct, I have no idea why I thought that was a cover

No worries, if you'd said that you were being sarcastic I would have felt like an idiot
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:17 pm
by Rainbow Eater
how about a whole album.
Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon or Dub Side of the Moon by the Easy Star All-Stars
Both are great, don't get me wrong, but I kinda like the Dub side better.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:22 pm
by mgconstruction
Rainbow Eater wrote:how about a whole album.
Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon or Dub Side of the Moon by the Easy Star All-Stars
Both are great, don't get me wrong, but I kinda like the Dub side better.
Never heard of it, gonna check it out. Thanks
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:25 pm
by mgconstruction
Wow def a different twist, Reggae Pink Floyd

Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:26 pm
by Rainbow Eater
mgconstruction wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:how about a whole album.
Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon or Dub Side of the Moon by the Easy Star All-Stars
Both are great, don't get me wrong, but I kinda like the Dub side better.
Never heard of it, gonna check it out. Thanks
let me know what you think.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:28 pm
by mgconstruction
Rainbow Eater wrote:mgconstruction wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:how about a whole album.
Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon or Dub Side of the Moon by the Easy Star All-Stars
Both are great, don't get me wrong, but I kinda like the Dub side better.
Never heard of it, gonna check it out. Thanks
let me know what you think.
Thought it was cool. They took one genre & completely made it another.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:31 pm
by pimpdave
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:26 pm
by demonfork
Rainbow Eater wrote:mgconstruction wrote:Rainbow Eater wrote:how about a whole album.
Pink Floyd Dark Side of the Moon or Dub Side of the Moon by the Easy Star All-Stars
Both are great, don't get me wrong, but I kinda like the Dub side better.
Never heard of it, gonna check it out. Thanks
let me know what you think.
dub side is the disc I'm listening to in my car at the moment...its been one of my favorites for a while now.
how bout' Smashing Pumpkins version of Landslide much better that the original IMO.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:42 pm
by jonesthecurl
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:41 am
by nietzsche
How about Shadowplay? I'm not sure but lately I'm liking it better played by The Killers than by Joy Division.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:13 pm
by Symmetry
I'm going to add Placebo covering Kate Bush:
Running up that hillShame it gets over played on a bunch of fun b-movie trailers nowadays, Daybreakers being the big culprit here. Still, It's a good reason for pop music as a a decent genre.
Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:01 am
by Kid_A
Jimi Hendrix remake of All Along the Watchtower!!
And it is not possible to remake a Beatles song better than the original

Re: Covers that are better than the original
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 12:34 am
by strike wolf
As a fan of Bob Dylan's work I would agree that most remakes of his songs are better than the original. A couple of exceptions;
Knocking on Heavens Door-Guns N Roses (may not be a popular opinion just don't like the GNR cover)
Desolation Row-My Chemical Romance (The Bob Dylan version blows this cover away. No contest)
Other than that, I find Chris Cornell's cover of Billie Jean to be better than the Michael Jackson version.