Page 1 of 1
TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:21 pm
by Robinette
It's been nearly a year since we've listed
The Top LOSERS in CC... so here it is, as of Feb 21, 2010
We have 16 players on Page 1 that have a win rate UNDER 30%...
So maybe they shouldn't even BE on the 1st page, afterall,
these players can't even win THREE out of TEN games...
Now THAT is a LOT of LOSING...25
JBoy 3480 1197 333 (28%) 4.9 USA
29
RL_Orange 3433 4660 1292 (28%) 5.0 Austria
32
joecoolfrog 3413 574 147 (26%) 4.8 United Kingdom
104
steve066 2852 2033 522 (26%) 4.9 USA
119
enlighter 2815 120 35 (29%) 4.8 Sweden
134
pzaviski2003 2759 3728 939 (25%) 4.8 USA
140
blkvanquish 2734 6888 1392 (20%) 4.8 Canada
145
EdwinG 2722 604 154 (25%) 4.8 USA
157
Robinette 2690 577 163 (28%) 5.0 California
160
laziboy 2680 319 94 (29%) 4.8 Canada
171
CEDEX 2656 399 104 (26%) 4.7 Serbia
185
K2_recon 2628 570 159 (28%) 4.9 USA
223
travonius 2553 2227 614 (28%) 4.7 Canada
230
Hawkeye Pierce 2545 369 102 (28%) 4.9 Netherlands
234
GoonSquadCaptain 2541 677 198 (29%) 4.7 Canada
247
lexie3000 2523 558 161 (29%) 4.9 New Zealand
What a bunch of LOSERS...
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:35 pm
by PLAYER57832
lol... particularly since they seem to like those 8 player games so much!
After all, 8 player games are such a sure thing to win ...
I mean, I've beat several of them on off days, when they were new, in 1vs 1... etc.... lol
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:28 pm
by JOHNNYROCKET24
thanks for the info. Ill make sure not to team up with them.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 3:36 pm
by HighlanderAttack
It all depends on what type of games they are playing--If they are multi player and winning at 30% that is not bad.
They also could have been bad and then switched to freestyle and now mop up farming.
You never know.
What actually makes a good player? That is the better question.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:48 pm
by Fruitcake
HighlanderAttack wrote:It all depends on what type of games they are playing--If they are multi player and winning at 30% that is not bad.
They also could have been bad and then switched to freestyle and now mop up farming.
You never know.
What actually makes a good player? That is the better question.
There you go Robin. Really you should have thought this through as HA has done.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:59 pm
by maasman
Fruitcake wrote:HighlanderAttack wrote:It all depends on what type of games they are playing--If they are multi player and winning at 30% that is not bad.
They also could have been bad and then switched to freestyle and now mop up farming.
You never know.
What actually makes a good player? That is the better question.
There you go Robin. Really you should have thought this through as HA has done.
I"m not sure if you guys are being funny or just didnt pick up on the sarcasm.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:02 pm
by fookeh
what the hell????
I am insulted I didn't make this list.
I suck dick at this game.
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=321908#wallEdit - Sorry I am not on page 1... just realized that's the criteria. Man I blow donkeys though...
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:02 pm
by EdwinG
I know why I've made the list and I think that simply relying on my win percentage is not an accurate explanation of my skill. I play almost exclusively 8-player standard games. I'm doing better than average if I win more than 12.5% of these games. I challenge any of you to post a win percentage as high as I have playing these types of games. I also don't farm beginner players.
If you play nothing but 1 vs 1 games and have a win percentage below 50% you are doing horribly.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:53 pm
by HighlanderAttack
EdwinG wrote:I know why I've made the list and I think that simply relying on my win percentage is not an accurate explanation of my skill. I play almost exclusively 8-player standard games. I'm doing better than average if I win more than 12.5% of these games. I challenge any of you to post a win percentage as high as I have playing these types of games. I also don't farm beginner players.
If you play nothing but 1 vs 1 games and have a win percentage below 50% you are doing horribly.
You know I had to do a map rank of my 8 player standard escalating games--I am 94 of 384 for 24%--Happy with that--I have played 10000 1v1 games and have a 57% win rate on that.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:51 am
by Robinette
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thanks for the info. Ill make sure not to team up with them.
lol... best to avoid playing std games with them too... for obvious reasons
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:54 am
by King_Herpes
What's wrong with std's?
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 1:55 am
by Robinette
Fruitcake wrote:HighlanderAttack wrote:It all depends on what type of games they are playing--If they are multi player and winning at 30% that is not bad.
They also could have been bad and then switched to freestyle and now mop up farming.
You never know.
What actually makes a good player? That is the better question.
There you go Robin. Really you should have thought this through as HA has done.
yeah i suppos--- wait, What?
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:34 pm
by EdwinG
Here's a little statistic that you might want to investigate. What is a player's average points gained per game calculated this way?
(Score - 1000)/games played
Players who play a lot of 1 vs 1 games against low ranked opponents won't fare as well as players who play against more and higher ranked opponents. Also, players who play thousands of games won't be ranked as well as players with the same score who have achieved that score playing far fewer games.
Simply looking at the win percentage, while perhaps being fun, really doesn't show how skilled a player really is. I'm actually quite proud of my win percentage (25%) considering the types and number of games I play.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 5:48 pm
by john9blue
King_Herpes wrote:What's wrong with std's?

Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:37 pm
by Bruceswar
EdwinG wrote:Here's a little statistic that you might want to investigate. What is a player's average points gained per game calculated this way?
(Score - 1000)/games played
Players who play a lot of 1 vs 1 games against low ranked opponents won't fare as well as players who play against more and higher ranked opponents. Also, players who play thousands of games won't be ranked as well as players with the same score who have achieved that score playing far fewer games.
Simply looking at the win percentage, while perhaps being fun, really doesn't show how skilled a player really is. I'm actually quite proud of my win percentage (25%) considering the types and number of games I play.
You clearly missed the point of this thread.... This thread is meant to honor good standard multiple player games. She used to have another one with the stats it, but opted to make a new one.
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Mon Feb 22, 2010 7:57 pm
by john9blue
Also I have a 27% win rate. Maybe someday I could join this exclusive club... not like I'd ever want to... buncha losers...

Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 12:11 am
by Robinette
Robinette wrote:It's been nearly a year since we've listed
The Top LOSERS in CC... so here it is, as of Feb 21, 2010
We have 16 players on Page 1 that have a win rate UNDER 30%...
So maybe they shouldn't even BE on the 1st page, afterall,
these players can't even win THREE out of TEN games...
Now THAT is a LOT of LOSING...25
JBoy 3480 1197 333 (28%) 4.9 USA
29
RL_Orange 3433 4660 1292 (28%) 5.0 Austria
32
joecoolfrog 3413 574 147 (26%) 4.8 United Kingdom
104
steve066 2852 2033 522 (26%) 4.9 USA
119
enlighter 2815 120 35 (29%) 4.8 Sweden
134
pzaviski2003 2759 3728 939 (25%) 4.8 USA
140
blkvanquish 2734 6888 1392 (20%) 4.8 Canada
145
EdwinG 2722 604 154 (25%) 4.8 USA
157
Robinette 2690 577 163 (28%) 5.0 California
160
laziboy 2680 319 94 (29%) 4.8 Canada
171
CEDEX 2656 399 104 (26%) 4.7 Serbia
185
K2_recon 2628 570 159 (28%) 4.9 USA
223
travonius 2553 2227 614 (28%) 4.7 Canada
230
Hawkeye Pierce 2545 369 102 (28%) 4.9 Netherlands
234
GoonSquadCaptain 2541 677 198 (29%) 4.7 Canada
247
lexie3000 2523 558 161 (29%) 4.9 New Zealand
What a bunch of LOSERS...
Okay... i decided i could use some points, so i invited these losers to a few games....
i've played a few of them before,
and clearly many fear me, so not all will join...
heheee

Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:18 pm
by Blitzaholic
why not top 30 under 30? too much?
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:53 am
by travonius
Yawn
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 5:23 pm
by Blitzaholic
Bruceswar wrote:EdwinG wrote:Here's a little statistic that you might want to investigate. What is a player's average points gained per game calculated this way?
(Score - 1000)/games played
Players who play a lot of 1 vs 1 games against low ranked opponents won't fare as well as players who play against more and higher ranked opponents. Also, players who play thousands of games won't be ranked as well as players with the same score who have achieved that score playing far fewer games.
Simply looking at the win percentage, while perhaps being fun, really doesn't show how skilled a player really is. I'm actually quite proud of my win percentage (25%) considering the types and number of games I play.
You clearly missed the point of this thread.... This thread is meant to honor good standard multiple player games. She used to have another one with the stats it, but opted to make a new one.
right, why not keep them all in one thread nette?
Re: TOP LOSERS under 30
Posted: Sat Mar 06, 2010 6:36 pm
by Robinette
Blitzaholic wrote:Bruceswar wrote:You clearly missed the point of this thread.... This thread is meant to honor good standard multiple player games. She used to have another one with the stats it, but opted to make a new one.
right, why not keep them all in one thread nette?

