Page 1 of 1
W.flame and mambo0[busted]es
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:41 am
by jjleblanc25
Accused:
W.flame
mambo0
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Game number(s):
6656368
Conduct a search for games with these two players. They've got 19 or so together.
Comments:
In the game I have provided, it's a doubles game, so it doesn't necessarily make as much of a difference. But I noticed that EVERY time they take their turns, one signs in, plays and ends the turn. The next then begins his (her) turn immediately afterward. Again, this doesn't matter as much in a doubles game, but check out their other games together. They do precisely the same thing, and in Standard or Terminator games, W.flame ALWAYS wins. Just appears to me to be a cheap trick to boost one's (W.flame) score.
Also, please note that I am not being a sore sport about my game with them. We're getting shellacked, no doubt about it. But I don't want other people to have to play against a "stacked" side.
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:44 pm
by TheForgivenOne
jjleblanc25 wrote:Accused:
W.flamemambo0The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Game number(s):
[game]6656368[/game]
[game]6286013[/game]
[game]6320974[/game]
[game]6333132[/game]
[game]6336717[/game]
[game]6348916[/game]
[game]6348977[/game]
[game]6419861[/game]
[game]6421603[/game]
[game]6446154[/game]
[game]6448876[/game]
[game]6471699[/game]
[game]6472286[/game]
[game]6560723[/game]
[game]6561624[/game]
[game]6561631[/game]
[game]6656374[/game]
[game]6689693[/game]
[game]6695934[/game]
Comments:
In the game I have provided, it's a doubles game, so it doesn't necessarily make as much of a difference. But I noticed that EVERY time they take their turns, one signs in, plays and ends the turn. The next then begins his (her) turn immediately afterward. Again, this doesn't matter as much in a doubles game, but check out their other games together. They do precisely the same thing, and in Standard or Terminator games, W.flame ALWAYS wins. Just appears to me to be a cheap trick to boost one's (W.flame) score.
Also, please note that I am not being a sore sport about my game with them. We're getting shellacked, no doubt about it. But I don't want other people to have to play against a "stacked" side.
Fixed the links, and posted all the games, to make everybody's lives easier
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:04 pm
by VectorxMan
wow that sucks if flame is using a multi bc Ive played games with him and hes won a couple
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
.
I noticed something that supports the multi theory. Whenever flame or mambo kill someone they say gg. in [game]6448876[/game] here are log quotes.
from the logs:2010-02-28 13:58:54 - W.flame eliminated VectorxMan from the game
from chat:2010-02-28 14:16:33 - mambo0: gg red
what this shows is that he forgot to say 'gg' to me as W.flame so he wrote it only 15 minutes later as mambo0
EDIT:
I checked out [game]6656368[/game] which is the game that sparked this report.
2010-04-09 03:59:29 - mambo0: hey, we're not the same, we're just brothers
2010-04-09 04:02:08 - mambo0: so, we are always at home at the same time. we can't do anything about thad
2010-04-09 04:07:19 - mambo0: but unlike my brother i'm not really good at this game
2010-04-09 04:09:24 - mambo0: but if you realy want we'll wait 5ours or so before the other one plays
I believe it because Ive got a brother who plays CC and we use the same computer whenever one of us visits the other.
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:23 pm
by jjleblanc25
Seriously, how long does it take to at least get an acknowledgment that this is being looked into?
I'm currently getting the "we're brothers" line of crap... 54 views and no mod response?
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:33 pm
by TheForgivenOne
jjleblanc25 wrote:Seriously, how long does it take to at least get an acknowledgment that this is being looked into?
I'm currently getting the "we're brothers" line of crap... 54 views and no mod response?
Just hold your horses, the mods may have lives, or may be looking at it without posting anything
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:35 pm
by jjleblanc25
Not trying to be rude, just a simple "got it, looking into it" would be nice...
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:45 am
by jjleblanc25
If that were actually the case, why hasn't mambo0 won a SINGLE game on his own yet? Brothers or not, something fishy is most definitely going on there...
VectorxMan wrote:wow that sucks if flame is using a multi bc Ive played games with him and hes won a couple
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
.
I noticed something that supports the multi theory. Whenever flame or mambo kill someone they say gg. in [game]6448876[/game] here are log quotes.
from the logs:2010-02-28 13:58:54 - W.flame eliminated VectorxMan from the game
from chat:2010-02-28 14:16:33 - mambo0: gg red
what this shows is that he forgot to say 'gg' to me as W.flame so he wrote it only 15 minutes later as mambo0
EDIT:
I checked out [game]6656368[/game] which is the game that sparked this report.
2010-04-09 03:59:29 - mambo0: hey, we're not the same, we're just brothers
2010-04-09 04:02:08 - mambo0: so, we are always at home at the same time. we can't do anything about thad
2010-04-09 04:07:19 - mambo0: but unlike my brother i'm not really good at this game
2010-04-09 04:09:24 - mambo0: but if you realy want we'll wait 5ours or so before the other one plays
I believe it because Ive got a brother who plays CC and we use the same computer whenever one of us visits the other.
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 12:50 pm
by VectorxMan
on mambo0's account he has 5 wins; only one of those were a team game with flame
Re: W.flame and mambo0
Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:45 pm
by Evil Semp
W.flame and mambo have been
BUSTED.
jjleblanc25 wrote:Seriously, how long does it take to at least get an acknowledgment that this is being looked into?
I'm currently getting the "we're brothers" line of crap... 54 views and no mod response?
Sorry for not getting to it earlier but it does take time to get to all of them. One of the problems is when you bump a thread and it starts to drop to the middle and can get lost in the list of post. I try to look at the ones that were started at an earlier date, and there has been a rash of secret diplomacy complaints which are time consuming. We also have games to play and other things to do.
As far as getting an acknowledgment that it is being looked at, we are damned if we do and damned if we don't. When I look at a complaint I will mark it pending if I don't come to a conclusion and have to come back to it later.