Page 1 of 1
secret diplomacy by scoblo-kid[CLEARED]ES
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 1:18 pm
by jjttll
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s): 8075697
Comments: scoblo-kid responded to a truce request by writing on the other guy's wall, then claimed it was a mistake, and that he doesnt read the log. obviously he would have had to read the log to know that there was a truce request, and then rather than doing the easy thing, which would be answering in the log, he chose to take several extra steps to answer on the other guy's wall. he's already admitted to the secret diplomacy, but is trying to pass it off as a mistake.
Re: secret diplomacy by scoblo-kid
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 2:15 pm
by afroaction
Game 8075697
scoblo-kid
i fixed your post merry christmas!
Re: secret diplomacy by scoblo-kid
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 3:13 pm
by theherkman
Accused:
scoblo-kid
The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s):
Game 8075697
Comments: Scoblo-kid responded to a truce request by writing on the other guy's wall, then claimed it was a mistake, and that he doesnt read the log. obviously he would have had to read the log to know that there was a truce request, and then rather than doing the easy thing, which would be answering in the log, he chose to take several extra steps to answer on the other guy's wall. he's already admitted to the secret diplomacy, but is trying to pass it off as a mistake.
FIXED
jjttll wrote:Conducting Secret Diplomacy
Game number(s): 8075697
Comments: scoblo-kid responded to a truce request by writing on the other guy's wall, then claimed it was a mistake, and that he doesnt read the log. obviously he would have had to read the log to know that there was a truce request, and then rather than doing the easy thing, which would be answering in the log, he chose to take several extra steps to answer on the other guy's wall. he's already admitted to the secret diplomacy, but is trying to pass it off as a mistake.
If this is the case, give us a screenshot.
Honestly, kid? That is not fixed, above is fixed...
Re: secret diplomacy by scoblo-kid
Posted: Fri Dec 24, 2010 6:04 pm
by richmnty7
Shouldnt the accusation be aimed at SirRico (blue)? Seems that blue wrote on his wall and scoblo kid declared it in game chat? But in any case it doesnt seem much to complain about.
Re: secret diplomacy by scoblo-kid
Posted: Mon Dec 27, 2010 11:43 pm
by Evil Semp
My question here is did Sir Rico ok'ed on the truce or when he was told/asked to respond to scoblo-kid's proposal. Still, I don't think this is an obvious secret diplomacy but perhaps Sir Rico could be more careful in acknowledging an opponent through the wall communication. As for scoblo-kid, he did not break the secret diplomacy rule. CLEARED
Re: secret diplomacy by scoblo-kid
Posted: Tue Dec 28, 2010 12:04 am
by Woodruff
theherkman wrote:Honestly, kid? That is not fixed, above is fixed...
Wait, wait wait...you're calling him "kid"? Egad.