Page 1 of 1

HATERS should die first

Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:27 pm
by Bostonguitah
Is there anyone out there like me who has a decent game going on your strategy is working at the moment and then....... some jerk pops in the chat box.
"We all need to attack ________ they are getting way too powerful"

Then you inevitably get smoked on your next turn never to recover and if that weren't enough the guy who suggested doesn't even win. Sucks right??? Especially when it seems like its every game.

I could see if throwing out a comment like that won you game after game, but to have some dude who has played over 1000 games and still a private yell it out. C'mon dude it's not my fault you're always attacking with 3's. Or a major who would simply rather lose to someone who has a higher rank than you. I mean come on its 7 points.

I think the HATERS should die first.
If your with me, attack anyone who says that lame garbage and lets start a new era of CC where people don't suck so much they resort to that nonsense.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 11:50 pm
by squishyg
Hehe, I feel your pain, but pointing out that someone else is winning is a valid strategy. It drives me nuts every time though!

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:03 am
by Evil Semp
I find the chat in this game amusing. Someone accuses you of doing what you are complaining about and you deny it. So the way I understand it is you are the only one who has a plan. Everybody else just does what they are told.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=9768174

Or this game where you are saying to put pressure on red.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=9663000

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:23 am
by Robinette
i HATE haters,


but what i HATE even more, is HATERS that HATE HATERS!

So before the HATERS die, the HATERS that HATE HATERS should die... :P

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 11:36 am
by Stephan Wayne
It is a good strategy if done right it sucks but its fair play.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:51 pm
by Bostonguitah
Evil Semp wrote:I find the chat in this game amusing. Someone accuses you of doing what you are complaining about and you deny it. So the way I understand it is you are the only one who has a plan. Everybody else just does what they are told.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=9768174

Or this game where you are saying to put pressure on red.

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=9663000
Can't believe you looked

the first game you reference is in no way me being accused for that? red simply misinterprets my strategy. He was about to take Oceania and it would have left him weak cause blue was stacked in said region I was moving in to clean up on red. Thats why I told blue you shoulda took him out earlier since he went about 5 rounds with 15+ troops in Oceania and never bothered to take the 4th region in order to get the bonus.

The second game you reference Is a game in which I am one of the last three player and one of those players is getting 20+ troops per turn and the other player was willing to just lay down and die 3 turns in a row. And the guy who won in that game is my brother so I can say whatever I want concerning him.

Dig a little deeper and if you find something that was the old BOSTONGUITAH. Ya know the beta version. I don't play that weak garbage anymore. I'm furious and full of rage now baby.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:53 pm
by Bostonguitah
Robinette wrote:i HATE haters,


but what i HATE even more, is HATERS that HATE HATERS!

So before the HATERS die, the HATERS that HATE HATERS should die... :P
or the HATERS that HATE the HATER HATERS should die. Than we'll all be dead.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:21 pm
by Robinette
Bostonguitah wrote:
Robinette wrote:i HATE haters,


but what i HATE even more, is HATERS that HATE HATERS!

So before the HATERS die, the HATERS that HATE HATERS should die... :P
or the HATERS that HATE the HATER HATERS should die. Than we'll all be dead.

i hate you... heheheee just kidding...

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 9:26 pm
by Bostonguitah
Robinette wrote:
Bostonguitah wrote:
Robinette wrote:i HATE haters,


but what i HATE even more, is HATERS that HATE HATERS!

So before the HATERS die, the HATERS that HATE HATERS should die... :P
or the HATERS that HATE the HATER HATERS should die. Than we'll all be dead.

i hate you... heheheee just kidding...

are you saying that you are a HATER????????????????

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:04 pm
by Robinette
Bostonguitah wrote:
Robinette wrote:
Bostonguitah wrote:
Robinette wrote:i HATE haters,


but what i HATE even more, is HATERS that HATE HATERS!

So before the HATERS die, the HATERS that HATE HATERS should die... :P
or the HATERS that HATE the HATER HATERS should die. Than we'll all be dead.

i hate you... heheheee just kidding...

are you saying that you are a HATER????????????????
WHAT? Ohhh no no no... I am not a HATER, But i HATE that you asked me if i am a hater...

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:37 am
by BigBallinStalin
Now I know what I'm going to do during any game with Bostonguitah.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 2:12 pm
by Bostonguitah
BigBallinStalin wrote:Now I know what I'm going to do during any game with Bostonguitah.
What??? Bow down and kiss my feet???

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:23 pm
by BigBallinStalin
Bostonguitah wrote:
BigBallinStalin wrote:Now I know what I'm going to do during any game with Bostonguitah.
What??? Bow down and kiss my feet???
Is that even sanitary?!

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 4:40 pm
by Army of GOD
Image

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 5:35 pm
by Bostonguitah
A T-rex??? Not sure where you are going with that background pic

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 6:28 pm
by tkr4lf
That's not a T-rex, dummy, it's a raptor. Duh.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:14 pm
by Bostonguitah
tkr4lf wrote:That's not a T-rex, dummy, it's a raptor. Duh.

Sorry I offended your nerd-dom. I'll try to bone up on my identification of species that don't matter one lick anymore.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 7:22 pm
by pickleofdoom
Army of GOD wrote:Image
mishateristic?

misomisonistic?

Is it a trick question? The PoD is trick-questionophobic.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:40 pm
by HighlanderAttack
I hate DUMB ASSES

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:54 pm
by demonfork
From the cc home page...

Risk all your troops on a daring land grab. Use diplomacy to coordinate a group assault on the game leader. Feel the thrill of victory as you crush your last opponent.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:56 pm
by Bostonguitah
demonfork wrote:From the cc home page...

Risk all your troops on a daring land grab. Use diplomacy to coordinate a group assault on the game leader. Feel the thrill of victory as you crush your last opponent.
Yeah and its a bunch of weak garbage.

You being a high rank should no doubt feel my pain. I'm sure youv'e been through it plenty of times. But you probably also love it when some COOK or CADET throws out the "Hey Orange is getting too powerful line" because you can sit back and watch everyone else desroy some innocent sap (whose power was exaggerated by the fact that someone extremely weak, foolish, and untalented mentioned it). You love it because they knock a contender out and weaken themselves as well and its easy pickins for a guy like you after that.

I know you'll tell me to quit complaining but it's just happened to me alot lately. And also I'm not a hypocrite like some who get mad when it happens to them but its ok when they win.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:59 pm
by WILLIAMS5232
they have a call out page in the forum where you can start private games in order to lure people into your delicate strategy. there are also user-groups that you can form in order to handpick drones that will play to your desires in order to keep this strategy relevant. until then, it's best to just learn to adjust to player tenancies. it's silly for the weaker players to just bow down and let you win because you think they should. i don't want anyone rolling over to let me win. you'll probably never join a public game where everyone plays to your bidding. they have team vs. team games, and 1v1's that play completely different than what you are probably used to. you may enjoy them more.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:14 pm
by pickleofdoom
If you dont like the diplomacy part of the game, maybe escalating spoils games are the way to go. It is a bit of a learning curve at first, but after a while it is quite fun.

Re: HATERS should die first

Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:17 am
by Bostonguitah
WILLIAMS5232 wrote:they have a call out page in the forum where you can start private games in order to lure people into your delicate strategy. there are also user-groups that you can form in order to handpick drones that will play to your desires in order to keep this strategy relevant. until then, it's best to just learn to adjust to player tenancies. it's silly for the weaker players to just bow down and let you win because you think they should. i don't want anyone rolling over to let me win. you'll probably never join a public game where everyone plays to your bidding. they have team vs. team games, and 1v1's that play completely different than what you are probably used to. you may enjoy them more.
finally someone who has a decent arguement.

I guess my main problem is when weak low rank players who are low on troop count and scattered region-wise, throw out that comment early in the game. They seem to freak out the minute someone turns in a mixed pair and go to 12+ regions. I hardly ever see high ranking guys say this in the chats. Rather, it seems to be the classic heralding of the cook and cadet class. Furthermore, I'm not as bothered by it if there are fewer players in the game say 3 or 4 player game. However, when its a 5 or above player game, just because some one has 15 territories 1 region bonus and everyone else is still around 9 territories, in no way justifies that comment. DO THE MATH if all opposing players territories is greater than 1 players. Said player is not in control.

As an aside why do people listen to cooks and privates anyway.