Conquer Club

Simple question. I'm not getting into the usual arguing thing against anyone for this particular topic. I'm voting for Newt Gingrich.

Not that it really matters since Republicans and Democrats
are nothing but different sides of the same coin.

I doubt you get the chance to vote for Newt. Once voters are reminded
of his unscrupulous, hypocritical and morally bankrupt ways, he's toast.

Where's the "I'm not voting" option?

Or, better yet, "I'm not registered."

Same person I voted for in '08... Clint Eastwood.

Or maybe Franklin:



-TG

I'm a Canadian and proud of it; however if I were a citizen of our neighbor to the south, I would not want to vote for:

-Obama. He's failed in the economy (it's as bad as ever), social policy (obamacare and the like didn't make anyone happy), fiscal responsibility (spending is out of control), the military (getting into another war when you're broke) and even in foreign policy--where I actually thought he would do well--he's failed (he seems to try systematically to offend the US's allies and he definitely hasn't helped the US's enemies like you more). It'll be interesting to see what he'll campaign on since he's been a disaster all around; there's less hope than ever and change--at least change for the better--never happened.

-Romney. He has a good face and knows how to answer questions generally well, but he's flipped on so many issues no one knows where he actually stands.

-Gingrich. He knows politics and history inside out and can communicate well, but he's a slimy politician like the rest of them, willing to make a buck wherever he can. He can't be trusted.

-Bachmann. A bit of a novice on the world stage. Probably in it more for the money she knows she'll be able to make from speaking and selling books later.

-Santorum. Ditto

-Paul. Has a lot of great policies in mind and stands for the truth no matter what. Predicted the bubble, recession, and knows some steps to take to fix it. However he's stuck in the 1800s with foreign policy, which would be disastrous for the world's superpower/policeman. Plus, sorry to say it, but he probably doesn't have many years left.

-Perry. He can't even remember the top three things he would do if he became president. nuff said.

Seriously, you guys are screwed. Where's Marco Rubio when ya need him, eh? Well, I'm glad at least we have a true leader in charge of our country right now. The rest of the world seems to be lacking leadership, especially Europe and the US...

oVo wrote:Not that it really matters since Republicans and Democrats
are nothing but different sides of the same coin.

I doubt you get the chance to vote for Newt. Once voters are reminded
of his unscrupulous, hypocritical and morally bankrupt ways, he's toast.

They are 2 sides of the same progressive coin.

There is clearly a different coin when it comes to Ron Paul, and it isn't made of nickel n copper.



Ron Paul will win Iowa and New Hampshire, and then the timid will join, for it will cost them no mainstream media ridicule when they see he can win.

I'm not eligible to vote in the USA anymore, but if I was I would vote for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

Timminz wrote:I'm not eligible to vote in the USA anymore, but if I was I would vote for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

Not.

Timminz wrote:I'm not eligible to vote in the USA anymore, but if I was I would vote for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

That is one visceral image

*gonna need mo coffee*

Phatscotty wrote:There is clearly a different coin when it comes to Ron Paul

You're politically duped and mistaken, Ron Paul is a member of the GOP.
There is no third coin of any consequence and even if Ron Paul managed
to get the nomination and become President, it would still be business as
usual. Congress and The House will maintain the two party's status quo
regardless of RP's intentions.

Honestly, I don't yet know who I'm going to vote. We don't really seem to have any really good candidates in 2012, so I guess I'll just give my vote to whoever is the least horrible choice.

natty_dread wrote:Honestly, I don't yet know who I'm going to vote. We don't really seem to have any really good candidates in 2012, so I guess I'll just give my vote to whoever is the least horrible choice.

Okay, so if you had someone like Hitler, and someone like Stalin, who would you vote for? IMHO, you can't just vote for the lesser of the two evils.

As for me, no candidate on the list I will vote for. I will be voting Constitution Party next year!

isaiah40 wrote:

natty_dread wrote:Honestly, I don't yet know who I'm going to vote. We don't really seem to have any really good candidates in 2012, so I guess I'll just give my vote to whoever is the least horrible choice.

Okay, so if you had someone like Hitler, and someone like Stalin, who would you vote for? IMHO, you can't just vote for the lesser of the two evils.

Well that's an unrealistic and pointless comparison, because hitler and stalin aren't running for president anywhere. If you have a choice between one guy who will make life in your country 50% worse or another guy who will make it only 25% worse, of course you'll vote for the 2nd guy.

As for me, no candidate on the list I will vote for. I will be voting Constitution Party next year!

Oh yeah, me neither, but that's probably because I don't live in America.

KoolBak wrote:

Timminz wrote:I'm not eligible to vote in the USA anymore, but if I was I would vote for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

That is one visceral image

*gonna need mo coffee*

You've never heard of santorum before?

I'm not American, however.. I'd just like to say, what a fine selection of candidates, America. Brav-ah, brav-ah.

I'd love to see Bachman or Perry win. I'd probably vote for Romney or Gingrich.

What about the options "not voting" and / or "can't vote".

I demands a Nader option.

If Nader runs he will get my vote as the only true Washington outsider.

Ive already voted durr!

Is durr running for office?

I know who my money is going on if he is.

Paul.

But likely, I won't be able to vote, so in that case, nobody.

tkr4lf wrote:Paul.

But likely, I won't be able to vote, so in that case, nobody.

Planning on committing something big, are you?

Timminz wrote:

KoolBak wrote:

Timminz wrote:I'm not eligible to vote in the USA anymore, but if I was I would vote for the frothy mix of lube and fecal matter that is sometimes the byproduct of anal sex.

That is one visceral image

*gonna need mo coffee*

You've never heard of santorum before?

I know right. How dare he have values different from you. Let's make sure we realize how vile he is on account of that fact.

Please nobody comment on VOL's previous post.

Timminz wrote:

tkr4lf wrote:Paul.

But likely, I won't be able to vote, so in that case, nobody.

Planning on committing something big, are you?

I've got a large shipment of cocaine coming in soon. But with my luck, I've got a mole in my organization and the police will be waiting. Fucking rats.