Conquer Club

Ms Clinton was 'careless' with classified emails, which she sent from her private email servers before lying about doing so.

FBI Director James Comey said "no reasonable prosecutor" would pursue a case but said the likely Democratic presidential nominee was "extremely careless" with classified information.

Mrs Clinton had said no classified emails were sent from her account.

However, FBI found more than 100 classified emails on the servers.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-36711711

um, no. that's not quite what they said, is it now, mrs? "not recommending charges" = guilty? in China, maybe.

They confirmed that Ms Clinton did use a private email server for official purposes, and that she did use that private server to send classified information. Two things which she strenuously denied, now confirmed by the Feds to be two things she did.

So we now have it confirmed that she:
- Did naughty things
- Lied about doing them

what does "not recommending charges" mean in China, mrs?

IMO, she's as crooked as a dogs' hind leg but your sensationalism gets tiresome.

Disclaimer: I don't really like anyone left in the election. Just find this particular segment from the FBI's statement regarding the emails a bit telling.
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."

UCAbears wrote:Disclaimer: I don't really like anyone left in the election. Just find this particular segment from the FBI's statement regarding the emails a bit telling.
"To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."

Quite. Another victory for the oligarchy.

mrswdk wrote:China China China

--Andy

mrswdk wrote:So we now have it confirmed that she:
- Did naughty things
- Lied about doing them

I've confirmed that:
- mrswdk does naughty things
- brags about doing them

Saying you should still vote for Hillary because she wasn't indicted is like saying you should hire Casey Anthony as your babysitter because she was found not guilty.

if the US wanted "real" change, they should have went with Sanders.

I heard on one of the npr or public radio stations where the fbi (or possibly some rep of Clinton?) said that they were "unaware" about the illegality of their actions. Like, wtf, maybe I should use that when I do something illegal next time. It's nice that the rules don't apply across the board, i guess. Wouldn't want the ruling class to be associated with the plebs.

-TG

Maybe Clinton's just trying out a relativist defense - "what is 'crime'?"

We should all thank her for elevating the tone of public debate to the levels of existential philosophy. Clinton - a real Thinker's president!

riskllama wrote:if the US wanted "real" change, they should have went with Sanders.

+1

It's a shame really, you have a general who wrote an fm on counterinsurgency and he gets his career ruined it for it. At least he admitted to being an idiot. Clinton just lied about it until it finally comes to light and now it's "oh Clinton, no worries, mistakes happen. Even people make 2000 mistakes of the same thing, you're fine."

Just goes to show that justice system shows favoritism and is corrupt. Celebrity? Oh, well as long as you don't kill someone you're fine, except if you're Ray Lewis. Presidential Candidate? Get a few folks killed, big deal.

Voting for her is like drinking bleach.

Also, China.

Hate one rule for them and one rule for us?
Hate vested interests overriding the people's interests in Congress?
Hate being completely ignored by your nation's leaders?
Hate being treated as cannon fodder for POTUS's global game-playing?

Vote Trump, 2016.

Think I'll take my chances with Gary Johnson over a glorified reality TV celebrity

Might as well set fire to your vote and use it to light your cigar.

That's how I've felt about this whole election. Between the major players of Bernie, Clinton, Trump and Cruz, it's been a shit show.

Three options remain. A criminal and a stinky piece of shit, a remarkable bigot with equal ignorance and a polished turd, or a political nobody.

All three suck, with equal potential to further turn this country into shit. Trump gets into office, we lose out on the illegal immigrant workforce, because these are clearly jobs that most Americans want. Not to mention we'll probably end up crashing the economy even further. Clinton will advance her or her husbands own agenda. 100% guarantee we will have another Somalia incident, along with shitty and shady back door deals. The political nobody is my best bet because, he probably won't do anything significant, but more importantly won't do any further harm. There's the off chance by doing absolutely nothing will cause more friction between the government and the people. But I'll take my chances.

I'll take the gamble with option c. Chances of him winning are slim to none, but I can at least say I didn't vote for either of those two shit bags we call candidates.

It's kind of interesting that the libup\repub alliance have so much of a problem with a female president.

It's kind of interesting that the only defense you can come up with for Hillary is to claim that people don't like her because she's a woman.

Great news - they're putting the band back together -

The US State Department is to restart its investigation into Hillary Clinton's handling of classified material when secretary of state.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-36742095

Hopefully the gap that Trump has already done a great job in closing will now vanish altogether as people realize that the Democrat candidate is, in fact, a career criminal.

Symmetry wrote:It's kind of interesting that the libup\repub alliance have so much of a problem with a female president.

I could care less for gender. I had to take classes to maintain a secret clearance every year. Mishandling information, especially top secret would have sent my ass to Fort Leavenworth where I'd break bigger rocks into smaller rocks for the rest of my life. Why is this air head above the standard? It's a grotesque misuse of power.