I'll do my best explain it to you. I'll bold all parts that seem in any way strange and then explain them one by one.
Gold Knight wrote:I know hes been there a while, but i got to give props to Yosevuk for
representing the USA. Finally took back
our rightful spot on top! Also, nice job to Gibbom for holding up that long in the top spot

.
As I said in my last post, yosevuk does not represent the USA, in no way. He hasn't been elected by the US public to play here as their official representative, nor has he been appointed by the elected government to play here as a representative. He has, to my knowledge, received no support from the USA, economic or otherwise, that has actively helped him attain the position he holds on the scoreboard.
He, as an individual, joined this site, played games, won games, accumulated sufficient points and now holds the #1 position. The USA has nothing to do with that, it just so happens that he lives there and therefore has that small flag next to his name.
"
Our rightful spot", now that's interesting.
I think it's a common phenomenon that whenever a person or team wins a competition, especially a large competition, people try to identify with this person or team and try to transfer positive aspects to themselves. It's something along the lines of "An icehockey team consisting of players with nationality X won the world championship; Nation X is the ice hockey world champion; I'm a citizen of nation X; Therefore I am, in a roundabout way, ice hockey world champion". In short: They achieved it, I'm like them, I might have achieved it as well.
Ice hockey can of course be substituted with any other comptetitive activity. This can be found in every country, it's nothing unique to the USA.
But "
rightful spot", it's like saying that the USA
deserves to be the #1 by default, as opposed to by merit. This implies that americans in general are in some way "better" and can achieve more than others. And any evidence of the contrary is just a statistical error that can be safely ignored. You see why this might irritate others, don't you?
Noone can object to an American being the best in his discipline because he trains hard, has experience, is disciplined, patient and talented. But saying that he deserves to be the best because he's american is a little like claiming that germans eat Sauerkraut because they are german, that french drink wine because they are french, that japanese read manga because they are japanese.
I know you didn't say it outright, but it is implied.
firth4eva and skittles already referred to this when they said
firth4eva wrote:trying to claim glory for what someone else has done
of course applying to my first point about identifying oneself with persons who have achieved something outstanding, which is, as I see it, a typically human phenomenon that should not be overly criticised; and if it is criticised it should be criticised in general and not case by case.
Skittles! wrote:Arrogance. Truly a virtue from America.
being an example of a reaction to what I described in my second point, your implication that the USA and its citizens are #1 by default, regardless of merit.
I hope this helps explain some of the reactions you received. It is not hostility or envy, but merely a reaction to a conveyed attitude in your post that you might or might not have been aware of. As I said, noone can object to a person or group of persons being #1 by merit, but if it is implied that this spot by default belongs to a person or group of a certain nationality, no matter if he or they have done the most to deserve it or not, you must not be surprised if other protest and criticise you for your statements.
EDIT: added an italicisation for clarification purposes, changed the germans example to something less offensive