Page 1 of 1

[MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Posted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:21 pm
by MTIceman41
Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME

Link to Clan War
Contacts
S&M: 1st MTIceman41 2nd Josko.ri
FOED: JPLO64
Start Date
May 7th: games joined within 7 days
Rules of Engagement
Automatic
Sequential
No Spoils, Escalating, or Flat Rate Spoils
Chained, Adjacent, or Unlimited Forts
NO FOG! - NO TRENCH!
21 Game Mini Wars
3 Dub + 3 Trip + 3 Quad + 1 Clan Choice Home (D/T/Q)
3 Dub + 3 Trip + 3 Quad + 1 Clan Choice Away (D/T/Q)
Tie Breaker Classic Trips ESC Chained Sunny
6 games max per player, tiebreaker doesn't count towards max number of games
***No map repeats
Maps Allowed
Classic
Africa
Age Of Merchants
Age Of Realms : Magic
Age Of Realms : Might
Alexanders Empire
American Civil War
Ancient Greece
Arctic
Australia
Bamboo Jack
Battle for Australia
Battle of Actium
BeNeLux
Berlin 1961
Brazil
British Isles
Cairns Coral Coast
Canada
Caribbean Islands
CCU
Chinese Checkers
Circus Maximus
Conquer Man
Crossword
D-Day: Omaha Beach!
Discworld
Doodle Earth
Duck & Cover
Egypt : Valley of the Kings
Eight Thoughts
Europe
Extreme Global Warming
Far East
Feudal War
France
Germany
Great Lakes
Hong Kong
Iberia
Indochina
Ireland
Italy
King Of The Mountains
Madness (our house)
Malta
Middle East
Midgard
Midkemdil
Mongol Empire
Montreal
North America
Pearl Harbor
Philippines
Portugal
Rail USA
San Francisco
Scotland
Senate
Siege!
Solar System
South America
Space
Tamriel
The Puget Sound
USA
USA : Apocalypse
World 2.1
WWII Eastern Front Image
WWII Western Front
WWII: Operation Iwo Jima
SandM Home Games
Doub
1. Age of Merchants Game 17423055 S&M
2. Feudal war Game 17423060 FOED
3.AOR: chained Game 17423063 S&M
Trip
1.Iberia Game 17423066 S&M
2.Siege Game 17423069 FOED
3.dday Omaha Game 17423074 S&M
Quad
1.Conquerman Game 17423077 S&M
2.Battle of Actium Game 17423080 S&M
3.World 2.1 Game 17423081 S&M
Extra
1. Quad
Philippines Game 17423082 S&M
FOED Home Games
Dubs:
Game 17425601Madness NC FOED
Game 17425602Malta NA FOED
Game 17425603USApocalypse NC S&M
Trips:
Game 17425604AoR2 NC S&M
Game 17425607Egypt: VoK EC FOED
Game 174256088 Thoughts NC FOED
1 extra: Game 17425609Bamboo Jack NC FOED
Quads:
Game 17425611North America NC S&M
Game 17425612Chinese Checkers EC FOED
Game 17425613Montreal EC S&M
tiebreaker
Classic Game 17423101FOED
SandM Player Count
Xroad3
Laughingcavalier2
Emilywink 2
Mageplunka69 2
MTIceman41 4
Pirlo 2
Ender_w99 4
Dustin800 1
Teegee 3
Kjg 2
Ian 2
Josko.ri 4
Bruceswar 1
Skillful 4
Astoriana 1
Enjoycocacola 3
Jcmagno 3
Nimic 1
All Black Rugby 3
Davekettering 3
Wizz00 2
Balleneus 3
Watsy 2
Merch 2
Vlad 1
FOED Player Count
Conchobar 6
Williams5232 2
Robbiedub 4
Woodsy2115 3
Uckuki 5
Crazysnakeguy 2
JPlo64 6
ElricTheGreat 2
Fyrdraca 6
Djfireside 3
Robespierre 6
Eurosport
Madmom 4
Avi8or 2
Pconnolly365 4
Kid Moe 2
Nicarus
juris
Ranking Confirmation
JPlo64 wrote:Hey guys,
We agree to having it count for ranking if you do.
Looking forward to the battles!
- JPlo
S&M agrees

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:34 am
by iAmCaffeine
You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:31 am
by MTIceman41
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.
Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:34 am
by IcePack
Wow S+M vs FOED in Round 1, tough draw but fun to watch!

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:51 pm
by iAmCaffeine
MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.
Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:
Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:02 pm
by MTIceman41
iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.
Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:
Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?
Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:24 am
by iAmCaffeine
I was just referencing your editing skills. FOED are good indeed.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:34 am
by JPlo64
MTIceman41 wrote:Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME
Contacts
S&M: 1st MTIceman41 2nd Josko.ri
FOED: JPLO64
Start Date
May 7th
Rules of Engagement
Automatic
Sequential
No Spoils, Escalating, or Flat Rate Spoils
Chained, Adjacent, or Unlimited Forts
NO FOG! - NO TRENCH!
21 Game Mini Wars
3 Dub + 3 Trip + 3 Quad + 1 Clan Choice Home (D/T/Q)
3 Dub + 3 Trip + 3 Quad + 1 Clan Choice Away (D/T/Q)
Tie Breaker Classic Trips ESC Chained Sunny
6 games max per player, tiebreaker doesn't count towards max number of games
***No map repeats
Maps Allowed
Classic
Africa
Age Of Merchants
Age Of Realms : Magic
Age Of Realms : Might
Alexanders Empire
American Civil War
Ancient Greece
Arctic
Australia
Bamboo Jack
Battle for Australia
Battle of Actium
BeNeLux
Berlin 1961
Brazil
British Isles
Cairns Coral Coast
Canada
Caribbean Islands
CCU
Chinese Checkers
Circus Maximus
Conquer Man
Crossword
D-Day: Omaha Beach!
Discworld
Doodle Earth
Duck & Cover
Egypt : Valley of the Kings
Eight Thoughts
Europe
Extreme Global Warming
Far East
Feudal War
France
Germany
Great Lakes
Hong Kong
Iberia
Indochina
Ireland
Italy
King Of The Mountains
Madness (our house)
Malta
Middle East
Midgard
Midkemdil
Mongol Empire
Montreal
North America
Pearl Harbor
Philippines
Portugal
Rail USA
San Francisco
Scotland
Senate
Siege!
Solar System
South America
Space
Tamriel
The Puget Sound
USA
USA : Apocalypse
World 2.1
WWII Eastern Front Image
WWII Western Front
WWII: Operation Iwo Jima
SandM Home Games
FOED Home Games
tiebreaker
SandM Player Count
FOED Player Count
Ranking Confirmation
JPlo64 wrote:Hey guys,
We agree to having it count for ranking if you do.
Looking forward to the battles!
- JPlo
S&M agrees
FOED Agrees

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Sun May 07, 2017 4:08 pm
by MTIceman41
Updated...S&M home maps created, sent out, and under link

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Wed May 10, 2017 8:47 pm
by MTIceman41
All games created and joined.
All player counts are within rules.
Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:

GL all, it will be a close one

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Wed May 10, 2017 8:51 pm
by IcePack
MTIceman41 wrote: Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:
I got this quite a bit on our set too lol

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (1) vs (0) FOED out of 21

Posted: Sun May 14, 2017 11:27 am
by MTIceman41
First blood: Game 17423063

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 2:05 am
by Conchobar
MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.
A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Sun May 28, 2017 7:21 pm
by MTIceman41
Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.
A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<
Solid clan then, and solid now...hell no not another 1 game loss...

Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Mon May 29, 2017 2:23 am
by Conchobar
MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9
I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:14 pm
by Fyrdraca
Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9
I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<
While neither game is definitely over yet, we are going to need help from the dice to have chance in either. Honestly I think we played the Conquer Man game about as well as we could have going second. I'm sure we could have made some slightly better moves here and there, but I feel pretty good about our play.

As for Actium, ugh. I realized a round too late (which of course in unlimited is huge) that our strat wasn't the right one for the particular game settings. I will say that we did have some bad rolls at crucial times, but not enough to completely change the outcome. Going first however and having a sizable lead early on, if we lose I'm gonna stew on that for a while.

Regardless, I think we gave josko and company a tough fight in both games, and I'd be interested to hear their assessment of our competition.

Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (9) vs (8) FOED out of 21

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:47 am
by iAmCaffeine
Looks like S&M will have this by 1 or 2 games depending on North America.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:57 pm
by JPlo64
Fyrdraca wrote: Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D
It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:18 pm
by MTIceman41
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote: Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D
It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)
Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:53 pm
by iAmCaffeine
MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote: Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D
It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)
Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one
One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:43 pm
by JPlo64
iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote: Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D
It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)
Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one
One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.
:lol:
(If you don't get it, look at the bracket ;) )

Re: [MWC4r] Rd 1: S&M (12) vs (9) FOED out of 21 S&M WINS

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:02 am
by MTIceman41
All games completed 12-9 final score.

Re: [MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:03 pm
by groovysmurf
Privileges removed, databases updated, topic moved.