Page 1 of 1

LOW (21) vs LHDD (28) - LHDD Wins - Final 4/3/18

Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2018 4:38 pm
by chard
Terms of War

Contacts:
Les Hussards du Dragon
Contact - fairman
Contact - Paengars

Legends of War
Contact - chard

Layout
Best of 49 Games (3 Rounds)
  • 8 Doubles, 8 Triples & 8 Quads per Clan
  • 1 x Tie-Breaker: Triples - Classic, No Fog, Chained, No Spoils
Rules
  • Not allowed: speed, freestyle, beta, manual deploy. poly
  • 12hr fog rule; details to be provided before next turn if broken, or game re-made
  • Trench games must have 20 round limit, no restriction on quantity
  • Each map can only be used twice per clan per clan war but can only be used once per game type (dubs/trips/quads)
  • Each clan will pick the map and settings for exactly half of the games
  • Games will be exchanged in 3 sets
  • Maximum number of games per player is 18 Games. Tie Breaker does not count toward this limit.
Schedule
1st Set: Jan 14
  • 2 Doubles
  • 3 Trips
  • 3 Quads
2nd Round : Jan 28
  • 2 Doubles
  • 3 Trips
  • 3 Quads
3rd Round : Feb 11
  • 4 Doubles
  • 2 Trips
  • 2 Quads
  • 1 Tie-Break
Link to War Page
https://www.conquerclub.com/public.php? ... WarId=2960

Set 1

LOW
Doubles:
[game]17983955[/game] Baltic Crusades
[game]17983956[/game] Poker Club

Trips:
[game]17983957[/game] Feudal Epic
[game]17983958[/game] Conquer Man
[game]17983959[/game] Battle For Iraq!

Quads:
[game]17987013[/game] Hive
[game]17983965[/game] Middle East
[game]17983967[/game] Unification Germany

LHDD
Dubs:
[game]17983585[/game] King's Court II
[game]17983586[/game] Austrum

Trips:
[game]17983590[/game] Rail South America
[game]17983591[/game] Stalingrad
[game]17983593[/game] Rorke's Drift

Quads:
[game]17983594[/game] Hive
[game]17983598[/game] Conquer Rome
[game]17983599[/game] Montreal

Set 2

LOW
Doubles:
[game]18022202[/game] New World
[game]18022223[/game] Spanish Armada

Trips:
[game]18022204[/game] Age Of Realms 2: Magic
[game]18022205[/game] USA
[game]18022206[/game] Northwest Passage

Quads:
[game]18022207[/game] Age Of Merchants
[game]18022209[/game] Eurasia
[game]18022210[/game] England

LHDD
Doubles:
[game]18002335[/game] WWI Gallipoli
[game]18002336[/game] King's Court

Trips:
[game]18002337[/game] WWII Gazala
[game]18002338[/game] King's Court II
[game]18002339[/game] Fractured China

Quads:
[game]18002340[/game] Prohibition Chicago
[game]18002346[/game] Philadelphia
[game]18002347[/game] Salem's Switch

Set 3

LOW
Doubles:
[game]18059763[/game] Conquer Rome
[game]18059764[/game] Clandemonium
[game]18059770[/game] Oasis
[game]18059775[/game] Egypt: Nubia

Trips:
[game]18059776[/game] Flanders 1302
[game]18059777[/game] WWII Western Front
[game]18059783[/game] (Tie-break) Classic

Quads:
[game]18059780[/game] Charleston
[game]18059781[/game] Das Schloss

LHDD
Doubles:
[game]18055763[/game] Classic Cities: Pot Mosbi
[game]18055778[/game] Battle For Iraq!
[game]18055794[/game] Das Schloss
[game]18055796[/game] Three Kingdoms Of Korea

Trips:
[game]18055800[/game] Conquer Man
[game]18056471[/game] Trafalgar

Quads:
[game]18055806[/game] Conquer 500
[game]18055808[/game] Antarctica

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 10:23 pm
by davekettering
Need LHDD to agree to these terms before I can issue privs to the contact individuals. Please ensure war acknowledgement is documented.

thank you

Dave

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 1:38 am
by fairman
Challenge accepted !
LHDD agrees to the term

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2018 9:11 am
by davekettering
Please create your war link. Good luck in your war.

Dave

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:58 am
by fairman
LHDD officialy ask a delay of 24h to create set 2 and same for round 3 (I prefer to do it the monday instead of sunday for my family life ;-) )
Can you add Paengarsas 2nd contact for LHDD

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 4:40 pm
by chard
That is fine. Take whatever time you need.

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 9:48 am
by chard
The dates for Set 2 / 3 have been updated (corrected). They are now as follows...

2nd Round : Jan 28
3rd Round : Feb 11

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:42 pm
by Arama86n
This is a random war for the giggles?

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Sat Jan 27, 2018 4:53 pm
by Donelladan
Just for fun yes.

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:41 am
by Arama86n
Nice.
May the best clan win.

Re: LOW (0) vs LHDD (0) of 49

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:59 am
by Arama86n
Donelladan wrote:Just for fun yes.

Was amusement abound?
Was merriment lurking in the bushes?
Was joy in the air?

Or was there simply blood and mud on a field full of LoW dead, and plenty of crows?

Re: LOW (12) vs LHDD (22) of 49

Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2018 10:35 am
by Donelladan
I enjoyed spilling blood on the field, does it count ?

Thanks for the war LOW !

Re: LOW (16) vs LHDD (24) of 49

Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2018 4:00 pm
by fairman
Looks official .. thanks for the war LoW.
The first set killed you ..

Re: LOW (17) vs LHDD (27) of 49

Posted: Wed Mar 14, 2018 9:38 am
by betiko
Yes good war guys, 27-17 i see it s official.
Looks like out of the remaining 5 we have 3 victories for you guys, 1 for us and the other undecided but leaning your way.
So this could end up 21-28 and be a much closer score.

Re: LOW (17) vs LHDD (27) of 49

Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2018 9:49 pm
by iAmCaffeine
I'm surprised it wasn't a little closer. Both good clans.

Re: LOW (17) vs LHDD (27) of 49

Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2018 3:06 pm
by Gen. Ramsarelli
Thanks for the war, folks! Great job!

Re: LOW (19) vs LHDD (28) of 49

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 5:38 am
by fairman
This war is ended, was a toughest fight than the results show.

Re: LOW (21) vs LHDD (28) of 49 - Completed 2018-04-04

Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2018 12:17 pm
by chard
Final score updated.

Congrats to everyone in LHDD. Very well played!!

Re: LOW (21) vs LHDD (28) - LHDD Wins - Final 4/3/18

Posted: Sat Apr 07, 2018 4:31 pm
by groovysmurf
Databases updated, privileges removed, medals awarded, topic moved