Conquer Club

And why have they been added?

2-- for being complete jerks.

2- 1 because he annoyed the hell out of me, the other because he wouldnt stop complaining in a game so I blocked him so I wouldnt have to see it.

I have quite a bit more.
Mainly for multiple bad feedbacks.

RashidJelzin wrote:2-- for being complete jerks.

Yo!

Only 5 and they all go back over a year.

3 for the double crime of being utter twats and crap at the game.
2 for ruining game after game by going for stupid kills and hanging somebody.
Things get better as you progress up the leaderboard because better players are loathe to get a bad reputation because they dont want invites to dry up.

I have around 25, though several are busted multis and a couple were thrown out for being complete jerks all over.

Basically, I will put someone on my ignore list if they swear a whole lot, start accusing other players of cheating or getting angry if they don't play how they like in a non team game. In one case, someone realized we were pretty well ignoring chat comments, so he decided to pm us his virulance. In another, a guy announced he was losing and not going to play after 2 turns. The kicker was he came back and complained about how boring the game was!

In a couple of cases, I have given negs based on the feedback they gave others. Joking is one thing.. between friends, some folks just like to insult. But when someone keeps giving other people negatives because they are "cheating" or considers everyone else a "bad player" ... I woudl just as soon avoid them.


however, I will say that I have been surprised a few times by folks who had a lot of negatives, but with whom I have never had problems. Maybe they just mind their manners around me or maybe they just changed their attitudes.

My philosophy on the ignore list is that you can't please everybody, so do your own thing and don't try and suck up to anyone with the fear of being ignored.

no.. you cant please everybody.. though some are experts at annoying most everybody

PLAYER57832 wrote:

however, I will say that I have been surprised a few times by folks who had a lot of negatives, but with whom I have never had problems. Maybe they just mind their manners around me or maybe they just changed their attitudes.

When im browsing games to join in, im also browsing people with bad feedbacks, sometimes its quite funny, sometimes PATHETIC (i wont name names), sometime the "jerk" digs himself deeper by actually replying to the neg often confirming the neg is deserved, lol.
I always check the negs before "foe'ing".If the negs are 10% of all FB, I usually add as foe.

I have just under 60 on my foes list. Several because they are known or admitted mutlis, several because they have such a consistent reputation for deadbeating, a couple for reputations as alliance breakers, but most because they are consistently rude in chat. There are simply too many nice people in CC to waste time playing games with people who conduct themselves like jerks. I especially dislike players that start accussing others of being idiots/stupid/f**kwits when a move is made that disadvantages them or surprises them... And I really dislike they guys that constantly complain about the rookies - you don't want to play with rookies, then play private games

Skiman wrote:I have just under 60 on my foes list. Several because they are known or admitted mutlis, several because they have such a consistent reputation for deadbeating, a couple for reputations as alliance breakers, but most because they are consistently rude in chat. There are simply too many nice people in CC to waste time playing games with people who conduct themselves like jerks. I especially dislike players that start accussing others of being idiots/stupid/f**kwits when a move is made that disadvantages them or surprises them... And I really dislike they guys that constantly complain about the rookies - you don't want to play with rookies, then play private games

Ive got more than you, and the list keep growing.
It might not stop all sour players to join the games I join, but so far so good, most games I play go smooth with little deadbeats.

AAFitz wrote:no.. you cant please everybody.. though some are experts at annoying most everybody

If playing aggressively annoys a player who thinks of himself as bigger than the rest of CC because of his rating, then so be it. If someone wants to ignore me for having controversial views in the forums, so be it.

Zero , so far, although there have been annoying players like GW Bush....

0

Vace Cooper wrote:0

i'm on your foe list?!!! wow...-0

p.s.-i have zero.

At least 15-20

I have more 'foes' than 'friends', but my 'friends' list is growing a lot faster than my 'foes', so I should be at a positive difference soon.

I got 0 on my foe list

White Moose wrote:I got 0 on my foe list

how did i get on your foe list, too?!!! this is unbelievable!!!-0

I have 56 names on my foe list (just counted them to make sure).

But then I'm an old git.

I recounted to be sure.

Friends: 15
Foes: 24

Quite a good ratio, I'd say.

Over five thousaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand!!!! Etc.

just 3.

0