Conquer Club

Who are you voting for and why?

McCain, short story...lesser of two evils.

If you want this to turn in to what would most likely be a debate, I can provide details. Until that point I'll just say that he isn't the greatest candidate choice, but he is the "lesser of two evils" like I already said

The poll needs to include luns101 who is running together with Stopper.

McCain. He is a politician, but at least he's honest about it.

I'm reserving my decision. There are parts of both candidates that I find good, and parts of both that I find appalling. I'm waiting for a straight forward debate between the two rather than trying to balance the spin coming from various sources.

given enough time, i could probably argue the lesser of two evils for obama.

Paris Hilton because we already expect her to act like a blond

apey wrote:Paris Hilton because we already expect her to act like a blond

That's not always a good thing.

The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:McCain, short story...lesser of two evils.

If you want this to turn in to what would most likely be a debate, I can provide details. Until that point I'll just say that he isn't the greatest candidate choice, but he is the "lesser of two evils" like I already said

I'm of the same opinion, but I'm not American.

MeDeFe wrote:The poll needs to include luns101 who is running together with Stopper.

muy_thaiguy wrote:McCain. He is a politician, but at least he's honest about it.

McCain is honest about it? What of this "Straight Talk Express" nonsense?

... John McCain.

... My paycheck can't withstand an Obama administration.

...

I'm voting Gigantic Douche.



Turd Sandwich didn't quite cut it for me on the heavyweight issues.

RON PAUL!!!!!

I'm considering starting a world-wide fund raiser for Paris Hilton. I think that every non-American should pay $100 to one American who votes for Paris. Considering the fact that she is unlikely to start any wars (it would take her 4 years to find her enemy on the map anyway) and the pure entertaining value, I think that it would be $100 well spent.

VOTE PARIS!

McCain, because he's white.

heavycola wrote:McCain, because he's white.

The only sensible analysis. The other guy can barely read, and smells.

Anyway, exactly what race is this "presidential race", what are the characteristic features of its members and where is it usually found?

got tonkaed wrote:given enough time, i could probably argue the lesser of two evils for obama.

I could argue the lesser of two evil for a trained monkey if it was running against McCain.

Snorri1234 wrote:

got tonkaed wrote:given enough time, i could probably argue the lesser of two evils for obama.

I could argue the lesser of two evil for a trained monkey if it was running against McCain.

They already got a chimpanzee elected twice and it didn't work out too well.

MeDeFe wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

got tonkaed wrote:given enough time, i could probably argue the lesser of two evils for obama.

I could argue the lesser of two evil for a trained monkey if it was running against McCain.

They already got a chimpanzee elected twice and it didn't work out too well.

Bush is actually very intelligent, he's just evil.

Snorri1234 wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:

Snorri1234 wrote:

got tonkaed wrote:given enough time, i could probably argue the lesser of two evils for obama.

I could argue the lesser of two evil for a trained monkey if it was running against McCain.

They already got a chimpanzee elected twice and it didn't work out too well.

Bush is actually very intelligent, he's just evil.

There is no way you can misunderestimate his intellect.

got tonkaed wrote:given enough time, i could probably argue the lesser of two evils for obama.

Tonka! You're back!

When Obama shows he has the testicular fortitude to actually debate McCain instead of speaking to hoards of forigners and looking hopefully off into the distance, I will make my decision.

Grooveman2007 wrote:When Obama shows he has the testicular fortitude to actually debate McCain instead of speaking to hoards of forigners and looking hopefully off into the distance, I will make my decision.

I think you mean 'hordes', it fits better in this context.

MeDeFe wrote:

Grooveman2007 wrote:When Obama shows he has the testicular fortitude to actually debate McCain instead of speaking to hoards of forigners and looking hopefully off into the distance, I will make my decision.

I think you mean 'hordes', it fits better in this context.

whatever. *dismisses with wave of hand*