Page 1 of 1
c2los666 [Busted]
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:30 pm
by samuelc812
Accused:
c2los666
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Game number(s):
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 4#p1789544
Comments:
It's Stephen Wayne

Re: c2los666
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:34 pm
by c2los666
samuelc812 wrote:need i go on

yeah
c2los666
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:35 pm
by e_i_pi
Accused:
c2los666
The accused are suspected of:
Being a Banned Player
Total contribution to the site so far:
0 games
6 posts in
The Firing of Wicked
1 post in
C&A Thread
Good for a laugh... a website worth a whopping $518.30 - nice to see a good 3 months work has amounted to a total value of $43 a week. Maybe you'll be able to afford that crack pipe you were hoping to get for Christmas
Comments:
Yet another attempt by the pariah kiddy to get back into the playground with their former playmates
Hint: Next time, don't be a douche
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sat Jan 10, 2009 11:38 pm
by c2los666
Im not banned yet and did you dont see the other thread about me?
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:11 am
by DaGip
c2los666 wrote:samuelc812 wrote:need i go on

yeah
Go with yo bad self...
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:13 am
by DaGip
This thread should be merged...
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:19 am
by InkL0sed
Clearly not wicked...
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:25 am
by DaGip
I think it was just a little kid that was spamming up the forum, that's all...no way that was wicked.
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:31 am
by samuelc812
Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user

Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:36 am
by DaGip
samuelc812 wrote:Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user

It might be a little punk friend of a previously banned user and the previously banned user told the punk friend how to really get at some people on the forums, just for a little punk laugh. That wouldn't be a multi, but more "trollish" and is dignified a "time out" and not a permaban from the site.
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:46 am
by Megadeth666

mmmm, could it be someone that received a ban recently?

Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:54 am
by e_i_pi
Megadeth666 wrote:
mmmm, could it be someone that received a ban recently?

I don't see them playing any games against ?'s
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:57 pm
by hwhrhett
DaGip wrote:samuelc812 wrote:Either way, this person appears to be a previously banned member, so i'll change that to it may be wicked, but wicked or no wicked, this is a previously banned user

It might be a little punk friend of a previously banned user and the previously banned user told the punk friend how to really get at some people on the forums, just for a little punk laugh. That wouldn't be a multi, but more "trollish" and is dignified a "time out" and not a permaban from the site.
dignified?
Re: c2los666
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:13 pm
by lancehoch
Merged the two threads.
Re: c2los666
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:04 pm
by Fireside Poet
Suspect:
c2los666
Verdict: Busted for multiple accounts along with Stephen Wayne.