Page 1 of 1

SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:27 pm
by THORNHEART
Um ok... calling Fox news biased and one sided reporting...a quote from this link is "What I think is fair to say about Fox -- and certainly it's the way we view it -- is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party," Dunn said on CNN. "They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that's fine. But let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is."

Are we serious here? LMAO what he just described is what CNN IS not fox...


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10 ... e-fox-news

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:34 pm
by Timminz
THORNHEART wrote:CNN IS not fox


Excellent point.

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:05 pm
by hecter
Timminz wrote:
THORNHEART wrote:CNN IS not fox


Excellent point.

I think we can all agree on that.

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 10:23 pm
by Hologram
Wut?


I'm sorry, your point was lost in the lack of supporting arguments and context.

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:31 pm
by Woodruff
THORNHEART wrote:Um ok... calling Fox news biased and one sided reporting...a quote from this link is "What I think is fair to say about Fox -- and certainly it's the way we view it -- is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party," Dunn said on CNN. "They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that's fine. But let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is."
Are we serious here? LMAO what he just described is what CNN IS not fox...

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10 ... e-fox-news


Thank you, Rush Limbaugh.

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:45 pm
by Johnny Rockets
If you consider either of these sources as anything but biased tripe spewing retards then well......perhaps you should be picking up the Enquirer at the supermarket checkout to make sure that you have a triad of well informed media sources.


JRock

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 11:45 pm
by Army of GOD
Well obviously the Food Channel is just communist propaganda.

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:21 am
by spurgistan
Hey, at least CNN busted the Balloon Boy story wide open. What moderately beneficial to the national interest has Faux done lately?

Re: SERIOUSLY?

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:48 am
by BigBallinStalin
spurgistan wrote:Hey, at least CNN busted the Balloon Boy story wide open. What moderately beneficial to the national interest has Faux done lately?


Well they thoroughly helped the then administration in convincing many Americans that Iraq certainly has the capable to kill thousands of American citizens with their weapons of mass destruction.

Didn't MSNBC and CNN pretty much puke the same rhetoric as well? I can't recall clearly...