Moderator: Cartographers
Seamus76 wrote:Very nice. I really like the men and ships, good work.
koontz1973 wrote:Oneyed, Trench warfare, change to Static warfare as the sites setting of the same name will cause this a lot of confusion.
koontz1973 wrote:Your tiny flags for the London attack and Paris bombards, place these next to or on top of the names to make it easier to understand. The London one is closer to the England name than to London.
koontz1973 wrote:Your soldiers, give each pair a different look and word it +1 for each pair.
koontz1973 wrote:Sinai name is going over the border. Move the border so the name sits in the territ. Same with all others.
koontz1973 wrote:Bottom right of the map can be held with 2 or 3 territs only depending on holding Greece or not. You have huge bonuses there with very few attack points. Find a way to open it up some more.
koontz1973 wrote:Why does Paris bombard Somara?
Oneyed wrote:koontz1973 wrote:Oneyed, Trench warfare, change to Static warfare as the sites setting of the same name will cause this a lot of confusion.
I do not understand here... btw, what is confused on Trench warfare when it was Trench warfare?
Oneyed wrote:do you mean by colours or how? will try to do something.
Oneyed wrote:ok, but in some places the names will be in the sea.
Industrial Helix wrote:Are you doing the battles still? I hope so, that was like one of the best parts of this map.
Industrial Helix wrote:You might try giving the opposite fighting armies coordinating colors to further illustrate that they're opposite.
koontz1973 wrote:Oneyed wrote:koontz1973 wrote:Oneyed, Trench warfare, change to Static warfare as the sites setting of the same name will cause this a lot of confusion.
I do not understand here... btw, what is confused on Trench warfare when it was Trench warfare?
Trench warfare may be just that, but with the sites setting called Trench, I can guarantee that you will be asked more than once why they cannot attack past this point when they are not playing trench games. Trench warfare may of been slow progress but progress was made so to have trenches as impassables would not be correct anyway.
tokle wrote:They are passable through the armies though, so I think it's still a valid idea.
How about calling them "trenches" rather than "trench warfare"?
tokle wrote:Love the map, by the way. Keep it up.
Dukasaur wrote:Also, during WWI Petersburg was renamed Petrograd. This is valid in both English and Russian.
Dukasaur wrote:I would like to see a city in Belgium
Dukasaur wrote:and in general 2 or 3 more cities in Western Europe. I realize it is a crowded area and they will be hard to fit, but for historicity I think it's important to give weight to the economic importance of the industrialized West relative to the agricultural East.
Dukasaur wrote:If you could somehow squeeze in Montenegro I think that will give some historical feel, considering how amazing was the Montenegrin performance in the first year of WWI despite its tiny size and eventual doom. Again, I realize it's a crowded area, but I think with some twiddling it can be done.
koontz1973 wrote:Have you decided on which direction you are going with the armies?
koontz1973 wrote:I like that idea. Clean and simple. One thing, it might be nice to see it in the legend as well to clear it all up for players.
koontz1973 wrote:Oneyed, wit the new abandoned maps policy, are you ready for this to get stamped or would you like it here for a bit longer?
Dukasaur wrote:Nice job.
Dukasaur wrote:I like the armies facing each other. Originally I thought they should all be different, to reflect different war zones (machineguns in France, horses in Russia, and so on) but I think what you've done actually looks neater.
Dukasaur wrote:When I have more time I'll try to improve some of your English in the legend. Probably not this week, but it's probably not important until late in the process, anyway.
tokle wrote:One suggestion I have about the armies is that you should try turning one of them on its axis, so that they face each other.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users