Moderator: Clan Directors
freakns wrote:whos naked pictures do you have?
chemefreak wrote:Can you explain how it works?
chemefreak wrote:Can you explain how it works?
IcePack wrote:chemefreak wrote:Can you explain how it works?
There's a fairly detailed explanation of how it works by FD. If you follow the original link, he links to the explanation off his first post.
IcePack
chemefreak wrote:IcePack wrote:chemefreak wrote:Can you explain how it works?
There's a fairly detailed explanation of how it works by FD. If you follow the original link, he links to the explanation off his first post.
IcePack
Actually, what I mean is, do you (the person now running the thing) know how it works? Can you explain the Otpisani issue? What I am thinking here is: Is this the rating system we really want to use without FD running it if no one understands EXACTLY what it is providing us? Or since it seems good enough...then it will work?
Ice, I am not being a dick. I'm really glad you decided to help out and pick this up from Gunn. However, I think we may need to ask ourselves: Is it time to figure something else out? Just a thought.
IcePack wrote:
I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.
IcePack
IcePack wrote:I'll look into it tonight, @ work currently.
chemefreak wrote:IcePack wrote:I'll look into it tonight, @ work currently.
No worries. My hope is that it is a simple fix. Everyone seems to like this ranking system so much.
Foxglove wrote:chemefreak wrote:IcePack wrote:I'll look into it tonight, @ work currently.
No worries. My hope is that it is a simple fix. Everyone seems to like this ranking system so much.
It's been, by far, the best one that we've ever had.
And by "best" I mean there have been fewer complaints that it's inaccurate than any of the other systems we've used over the years.
chemefreak wrote:IcePack wrote:
I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.
IcePack
I'm glad to hear it. Can you explain how Otpisani is so highly ranked? Due to results in file and decay factors, along with the weighting that is involved there is most likely an error in the data. Are you able to locate it? Or did you just find an anomaly in the formula?
Crazyirishman wrote:chemefreak wrote:IcePack wrote:
I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.
IcePack
I'm glad to hear it. Can you explain how Otpisani is so highly ranked? Due to results in file and decay factors, along with the weighting that is involved there is most likely an error in the data. Are you able to locate it? Or did you just find an anomaly in the formula?
Quite simple I think. 1.) Start new clan 2.) Win your 1st two clan challenges 3.) Enjoy a spot in the top 10
chemefreak wrote:Crazyirishman wrote:chemefreak wrote:IcePack wrote:
I understand the system fairly well id say. If you want to clarify what you mean by "the OTP issue" perhaps I can be of some help here.
IcePack
I'm glad to hear it. Can you explain how Otpisani is so highly ranked? Due to results in file and decay factors, along with the weighting that is involved there is most likely an error in the data. Are you able to locate it? Or did you just find an anomaly in the formula?
Quite simple I think. 1.) Start new clan 2.) Win your 1st two clan challenges 3.) Enjoy a spot in the top 10
That is not the way the Algorithm should function. My money is on an incorrect piece of data. If it is not, then the formula needs examined to see if it is an inherent issue or one created by the transfer of knowledge from FD to Gunn to Ice.
John Deere wrote:That shouldn't be right Ice. We had to win something like 8 wars straight to get in the top 10. And one of those where in the top 10.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users