luns101 wrote:suggs wrote:Why is everyone so obsessed by Ron Paul on this site
I have a theory, but it's only that. This election is beginning to shape up like the 1996 election as far as the Republicans are concerned. There is an enthusiasm on the part of the Democrats. Republicans want someone who speaks to conservative principles and honestly believes in them without just paying "lip service" to them.
Ron Paul has been the most vocal against Hillary Clinton in the debates. He speaks more passionately than any other Republican candidate that I've seen. He absolutely does not back down from any challenge. When you see that kind of determination, it's hard not to admire it (even though I don't support him). The other Republican candidates seem to back down when challenged to defend their conservative views. So in the absence of a truly conservative candidate, Paul fills the void that many are looking for in an opposition candidate to Hillary.
Many who support Ron Paul are libertarian. They're a whole different kind of animal than we conservatives. Quite frankly, they are more dedicated to their principles. Traditionally, liberals & conservatives are more practical at compromising part of their ideology than libertarians in order to achieve legislation getting passed. This is one reason why I believe they don't get elected to office. But it's just my opinion, suggs.
Well luns, there's quite a market out there for libertarians I think. Libertarianism and traditional Republicanism are closely linked....all that's needed is a specialized brand of it and suitable candidate. It's like Milton Friedman said, "I'm a libertarian small "l", and Republican capital "R" for the sake of expendiency".
Why are libertarians and republicans so different?