Conquer Club

I think Symmetry was high as a kite when he wrote this OP.

Warmonger, can you explain why you think somebody with duct tape over their mouth and tied up is suspicious?

https://www.twincities.com/2018/04/17/man-found-with-mouth-taped-and-hands-tied-near-st-paul-riverfront-fbi-investigating/

Talk about blaming the victim.

TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Hah. I generally don't like anything pretentious that tries to cram their political views on me by offering a social commentary, but i think that may be my favorite scene from sunny. Not the funniest, but just how well they depict the attitude of people in my generation, with how vitriolic they are in support/opposition to the war, but just having no clue as to why beyond everyday platitudes they've heard before. It really is great.

i liked the "you're an idiot" part best.

DoomYoshi wrote:Warmonger, can you explain why you think somebody with duct tape over their mouth and tied up is suspicious?

https://www.twincities.com/2018/04/17/man-found-with-mouth-taped-and-hands-tied-near-st-paul-riverfront-fbi-investigating/

Talk about blaming the victim.

You would probably have to ask the person who called 911and reported a.
" suspicious person". I would guess they were probably on drugs. I'm glad to see that you follow up on the Pioneer Press. Minneapolis Star Tribune is also pretty good. I remember you also like the Minnesota Twins and local radio stations. Have you lived here before?

No, I'm just stalking you. That's how I know that you are the one who reported that.

Dale Winton died last night. I'm waiting with baited breath if we ever see this guy again

The ram wrote:Dale Winton died last night. I'm waiting with baited breath if we ever see this guy again

Are you talking about reincarnation, or resurrection?

Haven't watched it, but the clips seem kinda funny.

Really though, Social Justice Warrior is such an artificial term to get to SJW. I get that people are latching on to what seems to me to be a fairly obvious point- that the term originated from a group of people, the alt-right. who aren't exactly buddies with Jewish people, and is clearly meant to reference that.

Sometimes you have to wonder, are the people on the alt-right dumb enough to do something like that? Or are their critics reading too much into their hatred of Jewish folk?

mrswdk wrote:

mrswdk wrote:

Fixed, you must feel kinda...































(puts on sunglasses)
















... waffle.

DoomYoshi wrote:No, I'm just stalking you. That's how I know that you are the one who reported that.

Reported what?

The suspicious individual.

To be fair, I do actually kind of enjoy the other phrase that's popular with the American Alt-right nowadays- calling people "snowflakes". It's so easy to turn around.

I'm not a big fan of "triggered" or "micro-aggression" on the liberal side though.

"SJW" is definitely proof of idiocy though.

I like the liberals phrase "racist". It goes well with any dish.

warmonger1981 wrote:I like the liberals phrase "racist". It goes well with any dish.

Oh no, the snowflake in me has been triggered!

Nice try, kid.

Symmetry wrote:

warmonger1981 wrote:I like the liberals phrase "racist". It goes well with any dish.

Oh no, the snowflake in me has been triggered!

Nice try, kid.

You have to admit it. Liberals use it every time.
"Kid"? You use it as if you wanted to really say "boy". Your racist undertones are quite obvious. You first call me a "white person" now you're basically calling me a nigger? You need some sensitivity training. Maybe you should apply at Starbucks.

warmonger1981 wrote:

Symmetry wrote:

warmonger1981 wrote:I like the liberals phrase "racist". It goes well with any dish.

Oh no, the snowflake in me has been triggered!

Nice try, kid.

You have to admit it. Liberals use it every time.
"Kid"? You use it as if you wanted to really say "boy". Your racist undertones are quite obvious. You first call me a "white person" now you're basically calling me a nigger? You need some sensitivity training. Maybe you should apply at Starbucks.

I think you're a kid because you're kinda immature about things. Does anything about your post suggest that I'm in any way wrong?

riskllama wrote:lol, he does kinda sound like kermit.

Most of the videos you see are of him fighting off hostile interviewers. It's very different when he's being interviewed by someone who likes him.

Bill Maher is probably still worse than Jordan Peterson.

Dukasaur wrote:

riskllama wrote:lol, he does kinda sound like kermit.

Most of the videos you see are of him fighting off hostile interviewers. It's very different when he's being interviewed by someone who likes him.

Isn't that just a basic fact about every human being though? Or at least that he coming off as kind of a dick when he gets critiscised doesn't mean that he's right when he gets soft-balled by a friend?

Neoteny wrote:Bill Maher is probably still worse than Jordan Peterson.

If America was a burning building, Bill Maher would probably be the first person I'd rescue.

Symmetry wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

riskllama wrote:lol, he does kinda sound like kermit.

Most of the videos you see are of him fighting off hostile interviewers. It's very different when he's being interviewed by someone who likes him.

Isn't that just a basic fact about every human being though? Or at least that he coming off as kind of a dick when he gets critiscised doesn't mean that he's right when he gets soft-balled by a friend?

Quite likely, yes. But I think an Internet culture which does nothing but post hit pieces on the guy could do with a little more balance.

Dukasaur wrote:

Neoteny wrote:Bill Maher is probably still worse than Jordan Peterson.

If America was a burning building, Bill Maher would probably be the first person I'd rescue.

Symmetry wrote:

Dukasaur wrote:

riskllama wrote:lol, he does kinda sound like kermit.

Most of the videos you see are of him fighting off hostile interviewers. It's very different when he's being interviewed by someone who likes him.

Isn't that just a basic fact about every human being though? Or at least that he coming off as kind of a dick when he gets critiscised doesn't mean that he's right when he gets soft-balled by a friend?

Quite likely, yes. But I think an Internet culture which does nothing but post hit pieces on the guy could do with a little more balance.

My understanding was that he gets quite of lot of sympathetic coverage on the internet- mainly from more conservative sites, sure, but hardly a non-existent demographic in internet culture. Even more left leaning sites and publications have published favourable profiles of him. or commentary on his work that can hardly be considered "hit-pieces".

Here's a few examples that I found:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/yes-jordan-peterson-really-is-that-smart

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/25/opinion/jordan-peterson-moment.html

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/01/sullivan-the-gay-rights-movement-is-undoing-its-best-work.html

I think you're over-stating your case, Duk. The idea that the culture of the internet is out to get the guy simply and demonstrably wrong.

SJW's are everything that is wrong with American society.

Here's why:
The perpetual death of cinema.
Can anyone really list a top 10 movie that has been ground breaking in cinema in the past decade? I'm selective as shit when it comes to watching movies, so I might have just overlooked a few that I should watch, but I haven't seen anything that revolutionized the film industry.

Take the Marvel Movies for example; The Black Panther and Spiderman. I don't have an issue with race or who plays whom, so long as it fits thematically and doesn't inherently ruin the authors vision. Mary Jane Watson has always been a fiery redhead and has always played a pivotal role in Spiderman's life, so why change her race? I don't understand. I'm not saying the actress can't portray her with her skills, but on a racial standpoint, she doesn't have the ethnicity, that's just fact. So why the f*ck do these morons blow their shit up when you mention it and point at source material rather than saying "Oh...I guess that makes sense." It would be the same thing if I had changed the Black Panther into some random white dude. He portrayed the hero Black Panther really well, but f*ck, he's white! "Oh can't have that, that's racist!"
Here's another movie that did this shit. The Dark Tower. Aside from butchering the movie to it's core, Roland is meant to be white, he is white for an exact reason that fits into the books because a character in this series is a racist piece of shit and tries to kill Roland because of it. SO WHY CHANGE HIM TO BE BLACK IN THE MOVIES?!

"Strong" Female Characters - There hasn't been a single fuckin one in recent memory. Take Rei for example from Star Wars. I despise her character within every fiber of my being. She's a Mary Sue, can do no fault, has 0 character development, there is no character growth, she's just a God amongst men for no other reason than just to be. Luke has this epic journey of an emotional roller coaster and you can see him grow as a person in the films, Rei doesn't display any of this. Know a strong female character? Ripley from Alien, or Sarah Connor from the Terminator series. Those are strong characters, and they have character growth and development that turns them into fucking bad asses.
"NOPE! WE NEED CHICKS TO SHOW US THAT THEY CAN DO GUY STUFF BECAUSE THEY'RE SUPER BAD ASS FROM THE START AND MEN ARE DUMB! DEHURR!"
Feels like every fuckin movie recently NEEDS a female either as a lead or a co-lead, and they usually fall into this bullshit category "We're smarter and stronger than you from the beginning." Even the Black Panthers sister falls into this, at 16, inventing all this advanced bullshit, and if you go rewatch the movie with one of the quotes "I put this railing system in here to transfer the metal," it puts some weird plot holes that people probably missed, myself included. Not that it matters since the movie was shit anyways.
I'm not opposed to strong female leads that have thought put into them, I am opposed to just slapping them in there and saying that this character is God's gift to man.

Idiotic reasoning - These morons will go on Youtube, Facebook or both and follow some dumb ass blogger, that blogger will probably have some really skewed views like "A person that is born can't identified as male or female." And they eat this shit up as fact. All for the sake of trying to appear politically correct. This is the heart of the issue ladies and gentlemen - Politically Correct. SJW's are the main cause for this bullshit with their shaming of others for their opinions and views. It's gotten so bad that It affects politics, video games, movies, work place environment, just about everywhere.

Take this stupid shit for example - A game that I adore right now is Kingdom Come: Deliverance, set in Medieval Europe in the 15th century, south east of the Holy Roman Empire, made by a company IN THAT REGION (They know their history). What do folks in America complain about the game? "No black people! Racist game!" Oh for f*ck sakes, really? It's historically accurate, there would be little to no black people in that region, how in the f*ck can you argue this?!

The narrative is the same with these degenerate pricks. They do more harm than good, and they have directly impacted our society on a larger scale than folks give them credit for, and it's not a good thing. It's bad, very fuckin bad. We're getting into the day and age where we have to walk on egg shells constantly and hope to sweet Jesus we don't piss off a group of these morons unless we want our information shared online.

SJW's aren't just dumb, they're cancerous, and that category needs to be on this poll.

Won't someone think of the movies?