Conquer Club

Timminz wrote:

Fircoal wrote:

richardgarr wrote: "That if the people you have power over all like you, that you are doing your job wrong."

That is one messed up quote.

Seriously. Who said that, originally?

nixon?

Hitler is my guess. Or Idi Amin?

jbrettlip wrote:Hitler is my guess.

I was going to guess that, but didn't want to automatically lose.

reference

i think wicked done a great job but once the admins make a descoin, do they ever back down??

this thread needs a pole!

wicked wrote:this thread needs a pole!

Pole? The real way to settle it is a KYjelly wrestling match in a paddling pool.

happy2seeyou wrote:Where's the poll

i think you mean pole

Edit: hmm already did that one huh... damn people with naughty minds!

truly_tasha wrote:I am ashamed to have given my money to a company that would treat their employees so badly and unfairly.

QFT

nesterdude wrote:That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.

To all of you talking about the "one-sidedness" of the issue... Twill wrote a post just about as long as Wicked did. He had every chance to explain how the decision was actually reasonable. Instead he said a lot of Formal Friendly Nothing. He BSed his way through several paragraphs in a way that makes it quite obvious that even if there is an "other side," it will not be very compelling. In any case, if Twill refuses to even attempt to show the other side of the story, then we have to base our view of the situation on what we know.

qeee1 wrote:jpliberty, don't try and restore sense to the argument, that's not fun.

I know. I'm sorry. Ban me.

Ditocoaf is right in that Twill has posted nothing to explain his side of the issue, however, I would like to get a more nuanced view of what took place before anyone gets sacked.

MeDeFe wrote:Ditocoaf is right in that Twill has posted nothing to explain his side of the issue, however, I would like to get a more nuanced view of what took place before anyone gets sacked.

We're being an angry mob...we don't care about the point of view.

The Weird One wrote:

MeDeFe wrote:Ditocoaf is right in that Twill has posted nothing to explain his side of the issue, however, I would like to get a more nuanced view of what took place before anyone gets sacked.

We're being an angry mob...we don't care about the point of view.

I'd actually like to hear it. However, the fact that we're pointedly not hearing their side, is telling enough, to me.

azezzo wrote:keep wicked.
shes one of the few mods with a set of balls.

And I thought Wicked was a lady?!

C.

yeti_c wrote:

azezzo wrote:keep wicked.
shes one of the few mods with a set of balls.

And I thought Wicked was a lady?!

C.

Who says they're her balls.

nesterdude wrote:

suggs wrote:Its seems the only fair solution.
Well, the sensible solution would be to re-instate Wicked, but folks round here have too much false pride to reverse decisions.
So firing Twill in the interests of Community Harmony seems the way forward.
Any thoughts on his leaving present?

That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.

I've more education in my little finger than the rest of this site put together, so your argument is dismissed with disdain.

suggs wrote:

nesterdude wrote:

suggs wrote:Its seems the only fair solution.
Well, the sensible solution would be to re-instate Wicked, but folks round here have too much false pride to reverse decisions.
So firing Twill in the interests of Community Harmony seems the way forward.
Any thoughts on his leaving present?

That's not an uneducated mob mentality coming to quick emotional decisions with pieces of information from a one sided source...
nooooooooooo not at all.

I've more education in my little finger than the rest of this site put together, so your argument is dismissed with disdain.

yer he's forgetting that your suggs, suggs is never wrong, even when pretending to flirt with sum1 who isnt even 18 till august 12th!

bow to suggs, he is the king.

The motion is passed.



ps i think Twill should resign, let him keep some dignity.

i volenteer to take over his works:D seriously,:D

pimphawks70 wrote:I couldn't agree more

Twill is gay while wicked rocks

Yo, yo!

sam_levi_11 wrote:suggs is never wrong, even when pretending to flirt with sum1 who isnt even 18 till august 12th!

There's nothing wrong with that.

Just so long as the person isn't flirting with sum1 who isnt even 15 till august 12th, then all is well.

Remember kids: Ladies are like stock options, you buy them when they're young and cheap, then hold onto them until their assets mature... after that you either liquidate them and sell of their valuable holdings, or you put on a suit and take them to a big hall on Wall Street and sell them to rich old dudes who smoke big cigars and look like the guy on the Monopoly box.


Now, what were we talking about again?

Poles and wicked sex

girls.

sack twill.

No, no I don't think Lack should fire Twill.

Minister Masket wrote:No, no I don't think Lack should fire Twill.

Good. Its nice to have a debate. Still, at the moment I havent heard a single decent reason why he should remain de facto in charge.