but if you play on the classic board, with escalating/adjacent rules, no fog of war, no freestyle, and no teams. its exactly the same, just online. Now that may be a lot of ifs, but Ill bet youlll find a lot of games that look just like that. Now CC can be developed and have options added, but the ...

I just had an idea, and if theres a place it can be implemented, or at least discussed, its here on CC. Anyway, so basicly, take the game we have now, only no player can see how many armies are on territories that aren't their own, or adjacent to them. Traps and feints and all sorts of fun tactics ...

Not Very Experienced (or likely, good) At Making Maps, but I wonder if anyone would consider Toronto, Canada as a good city to divide into a map? it naturally has 6 parts to it, (North York, East York, York, Old Toronto, Etobicoke and Scarborough) of varying sizes. It has the possibility of 1-2 ...

Ive noticed that in the cards (you know, the ones to trade in for armies, lol) it point out in bold the cards for which one has the coresponding territories. Does that do anything at all? do you get a bonus if you trade in a set which is all bold?

Question Answered Here