so someone who played the strategy perfectly by managing to scrape by and plan the cards is able to wipe out three other players who were foolishly playing flat rate strategy . gee WHAT A FANTASTIC GAME TYPE. Now this is what global domination is all about !!!

Now you've got it right ...

well if that was the original version of risk it must have been terrible. but ok, no more complaining, but questioning.


is that how the game type is supposed to be played? completely based off of cards?


if you can be the weakest and still beat everyone "in an instant" where does skill and ...

so someone who played terribly but managed to scrape by and get a few lucky cards is able to wipe out three other players who played much better than him. gee WHAT A FANFUCKINGTASTIC GAME TYPE. this bullshit makes a mockery out of global domination.

btw, i love how i can say fucking, but not f*ck ...

so im playing a game. im doing well. i would say im even the front runner. i pretty much have the game on lock.


AND THEN OUT OF FUCKING NO WHERE


this guy with like 5 territories left, trades in three sets of cards for 75 armies and wipes out the board.


WHAT THE f*ck IS THAT?

thanks. im pretty sure 1v1 would be terrible with cards or without.

i remember the first time i played risk against people rather than computers and thinking, "god this is awful." the only thing someone really had to do to win was amass troops, wait until they got their cards, and then add those armies to the ones they already had concentrated and go on a world tour ...