I don't see why Anglia has such a big bonus -- It has just as many borders as Wales. Its bonus is greater than the number of countries that it contains.

Ever play Castle Risk? You should make that

6 borders is too hard to hold. So is 4, with a 3 bonus. Neither in the Asia map nor the Classic are there continents with 6 borders.

What's a Kiwi?

Hey - don't advertise other Risk games on here .

That's a dick move.

I don't think oil will be an issue in 2100, and I definitely don't think Russia will be a superpower ever again.

China has numbers, yes, but you have to go per capita. I think that the US will stay on top - but I guess I'm a little biased. I'm just glad that no one has voted for Canada

Game 6666 - doubles holding to get double turns. I hate that.

Yes, it just seems like there are a surplus of territories on the Middle East map that have no purpose (ie. Khartoum, Aksum, Upper Nile, Darfur, Golestan, etc.) On the current CC maps most of the countries play a role in connecting to other continents -- not just being there to add countries. If you ...

Although it only has three borders, there are a lot of territories in Egypt that make it worth more than 5. I also think that there should be at least 6 'continents' in a map - just my opinion, though. You should make the borders more natural, too. Maybe I'm just picky

Nice map

Bess can't stop this

How about a time stamp on the 'Join Game' list? That way you can see which games were made recently and which ones have creators that are away.

Why should a player waste his points? Why should the winner of a doubles game gain points of players that had no partner? Its the same idea of gaining points of deadbeats in standard games... Why gain points if you didnt need to do nothing (or almost nothing) to win?

Because if you join a game ...

Sorrrrry

Is there a good reason for deadbeats to not lose points? I've gone over every situation in my head, and I can't think of one. Thanks.

So is capitalism.

mikey6rocker wrote:michael moore only tells the truth.

That's why I keep saying it.

Double turns should be for an entire team in team games and indivual in individual games. I'm sick of people holding their turn in team games so that they get a double turn.

It was your fragments.

one of the last major contributors to troops in Iraq
I didn't know if you meant least or last because last doesn't really make sense in that sentence.

Yes, I agree. Politics are made up of "illusions". However, there is no abundance of illusions on one side. Democrats ...

So you think Saddam would have woken up one day and said "I'm not going to be an ass anymore!"? No. You thinking that it's a "stupid war" is merely an opinion - I asked for facts.



and they condone britain for not helping them in a war
Condone means to forgive. Britain did help with the war ...

It doesn't make sense to NOT allow double turns in a doubles game - but then the other team just manipulates it so they do take double turns. Double turns should go by teams in team games and individuals in individual games.

Speak English.

How about a 10 minute turn time limit in Doubles games. I've played too many games where the other team does not end there turn so as to have a double turn when my partner and I turn our backs.

If you're going to say something like that at least give examples.

Or it could just mean that he hears his parents talk about things he doesn't know about.

MOD EDIT: This suggestion is geared towards a feature to remember usernames and passwords once accessing the home screen, but is similar to this suggestion about no automatic sign outs.

View spearfish's "5 minute fix" to implement this idea:

As a PHP programmer, I know that this is about a five ...