i've never given feedback and ive never recieved it cause feedback is gay.

i joined january 3

'Incorrect statement, since you never said 5 of the top 6, but I played along "

man u are dense. this was from the 5th post in this thread.

"Take a look at the rankings. there is a reason why 5 of the top 6 players play a ton of doubles and with the same partner over and over. we might as well ...

if you suggested this last week why are u being a turd in my thread?

"I have already negated your two initial arguments about the top 6 players in a non-botchy manner."
You haven't negated anything. You restated that the fifth place guy played only singles and that scorba has played alot of singles. that still doesnt refute the initial argument. why is the top of ...

"Get a fucking clue, I can't believe you're actually complaining about how other people get their points.

Here's a suggestion, try worrying about yourself."

Its funny how doubles players are getting so riled up by this suggestion. Both of you seem defensive but unable to address the original ...

are u even reading my posts. I said 5 of the top 6. your exception has already been noted. the more i talk to you the more its not surprising that you dont understand this anomaly of the highest ranked players playing doubles with the same partners over and over and having ridiculous scores.

If freestyle escalating chained games players dominated the scoreboard then you would have a point. I wouldnt call it a specialized game its the default settings. I play it because i feel it is closest to what i would play with friends in real life.
If youre having such fun looking at my game logs ...

"then play doubles "

first i dont want to play doubles. the game doesnt appeal to me.

'and the reason most play doubles is the simple reduction in point swings."

If by reduction in point swings you mean reducing them to one direction than i understand what you mean. I think they play ...

I have been here since the beginning. I was in game number 2 and won against lack himself. I have been on the front page of the leader board for practically all of this site's history. and i have no money

i got up to fourth a long time ago. now i'm 24th but i'm on the climb

I understand the point gain on wins is smaller But the probablity of winning rises immensely. And the whole loosing more points then you gain thing happens to anyone who has built a high score. Take a look at the rankings. there is a reason why 5 of the top 6 players play a ton of doubles and with ...

I see many people highly ranked collect much of thier points from doubles games. They have a partner they have played with frequently and wait patiently for two unaffiliated suckers to stumble in to face thier doom. This to me seems to be an unfair advantage in the usually level playing field of ...

I hate the gays and all of thier alliances

i started my turn but didnt deploy my armies in a game and then the site went down. kinda sucks.

Eglambar- i just killed you hahahaha.

Well what if youre attacking western astralia then you just dead ended your armies . i dont like the idea.

temporarily i think it would be worth it to get 3 games at a time.

There is something that just seems wrong about making new jersey the most valuable territory to hold in any map. especially one of NYC

i was just having a little fun

There is something kind of hillarious about adults arguing over truces on a board game.

holding is for bitches. You make this site less fun and you people have spread like cancer. go find some other webgame to ruin.

everyone realizes the advantage to holding. most just have the dignity not to try and exploit a glitch

everyone realizes the advantage that holding is. Most people just have the dignity not to exploit it. Its a cheesedick way to get around double turns. Agent i feel sorry for those who have the misfortune of playing against you and the other holders.

how would these people know youre password or other's

sequential games take much longer to play, so saying play sequential games instead is really nonsense. cheater.