Christmas gift

CombatFigye: 254 - vs - Lof: 45
CombatFigye: 112 - vs - Lof: 46
CombatFigye: 312 - vs - Lof: 35

what a way to start a game...... odds for a double miss, three times in a row? HO HO HO

pretty good? as in rolling 2 vs 2 and winning double 3 times in a row?

I´d think this would be pretty rare...

I'm also recommending that you look into improving your strategy. Rank is by no means an accurate indication of skill, but if you can't rise up to at least lieutenant with the game types you play, then there's very obviously something wrong with your strategy.

There is. The thing wrong is that I ...

Round 1= 6x3 kill 1 lose 3, no card
Round 2 = 6x2 kill 2, get card
Round 3 = 8x3, kill 1 lose 5, no card

Enterin round 4, 6 player game, everybodybut me have 3 cards. Game lost for me.

And the day continues - 16 armies x 3 = 12 remains ... 12 x 2 = 7 remains
RADAGA, maybe sometime in the next ...

Yeah, you've done it now. You've found unrefutable evidence that the dice are rigged. Good for you.

I mean, a whole 3 dice rolls? What are the odds!

No, but I have found irrefutable evidence no one cares, even if you come with a screenshot of a 100x1 loss. I fond also that people have absolute ...

Round 1= 6x3 kill 1 lose 3, no card
Round 2 = 6x2 kill 2, get card
Round 3 = 8x3, kill 1 lose 5, no card

Enterin round 4, 6 player game, everybodybut me have 3 cards. Game lost for me.

And the day continues - 16 armies x 3 = 12 remains ... 12 x 2 = 7 remains

13vs4 end 3x2

those dice rolls of yours does not even get close to the streaks we see here.

Just now> 9 vs 12, end 3vs12, oppponent gets his turn, put 11 on the 12 stack = 23 armies.

e proceed to kill those 3, trample a 5, kill 9 more ones and face a 25 stack.. that battle ends with hiim with 3 armis left ...

natty_dread wrote:

RADAGA wrote:And it continues to amaze me.

Hello Ragada, I saw this site and immediately thought it might be of help for you:

http://ocd.about.com/od/livingwithoc1/a/OCD_help.htm

Thanks, natty, it is always a good thing to know people care. You pushed the world towards being a better place a little bit today!

And it continues to amaze me.

I posted last 5 battles yesterday.

I post them today

-21% -41% -58% -42% -21% -34% -21% -39% -58% -42%

cute, isn´t it?

I'd like to see the algorithm on witch this special comparasing cude is built. Is it in some forum or something? It would realy show everybody how the randomness "works".

LAST 5 BATTLES
Defend -44% 2.40 0 6 4 0 0 0 - TEN DICE, only 2 and threes rolled. Get 10 d6 and roll, repeat until you only ...

Sometime, I want to see a breakdown of your posting stats, in regards to: seeing how many times you mention the word 'dice' over the course of your time here on CC, in addition to how many Posts you've created in Dice Topics, and how many unique Dice Topics you've posted in total.


--Andy


No ...

WTF! WHAT IS THIS??!!!!

Combat
DD3: 1 4 3
- vs -
Sdt. Gerd: 6 6

Combat
DD3: 2 1 6
- vs -
Sdt. Gerd: 6 4

Combat
DD3: 3 2 3
- vs -
Sdt. Gerd: 1 1

Combat
DD3: 5 5 5
- vs -
Sdt. Gerd: 1 6

Combat
DD3: 3 5 6
- vs -
Sdt. Gerd: 6 6

Combat
DD3: 2 4 6
- vs -
Sdt. Gerd: 6 4 ...

The civilians don't die in my imagination, at least not much. Everyone gets troops immediately from conquered provinces, and it doesn't seem like people would line up at your recruitment centers had your troops been pillaging indiscriminately the day before.

I do, however, feel sorry for villagers ...

Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:23 pm
Last visited: Mon Jun 27, 2011 4:09 pm
Total posts: 316 | Search user’s posts
(0.01% of all posts / 0.25 posts per day)

Most active forum: General Discussion(242 Posts / 76.58% of your posts)

Most active topic: One more thing about the dice.(159 Posts / 50.32 ...

Yes, WAY more than half. I give you someone to toll with (me) every week. You should thank me. I am saving the world one sigh a time.

Yes, I do see. The problem is something called laws of probability. You should see some weird results, if you roll enough times. The problem is that there is a percentage of chance you should see them. For example, the odds of losing six 3x1 in a row are 1 to 750

So you should see one of those ...

Again, I know it AVERAGES out.

but what is the point, when you win 10 times in a row a 3x1, and then lose six in a row the next 3x1 you attempt

the average results are fine, but that game in particular is ruined because of a ridiculous streak that is totally surreal and should not be seen.

again ...

Game 9239154

17 armies, to fighr 1; 1; 1; 1 = I ended with 6, leaving 1 behind each conquerings, 9 armies left, lost 8 to kill 4 - typical.

dice stats

opponent dice, total
last 5 rolls - 7 / 5 /6 / 10 / 16 / 11 (18 below 3 - 37 above)

Ridiculous!

Yeah, of course. I just did 3 attacks>

12x1 end 7x0
7x1 end 3x1
5x1 end 3x1

in other words, in the previous 11 3x1 rolls I lost 10, won 1

this should not happen with my rolling sample size. I dont have 200.000 rolls to see one of those.

Actually, I picture MY troops are composed of children, livestock and general civilian population armed with makeshift weapons fighting fuly equipped navy S.E.A.L.S. all the time.

That would explain some of my results

No one have overall positive. the system is broken. mine are 0 -2 0

Oh, but that was. My WHOLE rant about dice is about it being streaky, not about it averaging out.

I have said SEVERAL times that, if you get this sample dice: 1;1;1;2;2;2;3;3;3;4;4;4;5;5;5;6;6;6 will show as a perfectly evened out sample of dice. 3 results for each, on a (6x3) sample.

however, it ...

3 vs 2 3 vs 1 2 vs 2 2 vs 1 1 vs 2 1 vs 1
Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses Luck Kills Losses
Assault 0% 1181 1005 0% 728 371 +11% 13 13 -9% 32 33 +8% 1 2 -8% 14 28
Defend -1% 1078 1306 -2% 319 673 -2% 55 39 -14% 20 50 +15% 17 2 0% 29 21
Total ...