It is close to the mark but everything seems fine to me.

They could still play other games. How much would it suck to join a doubles game only to learn your partner can't communicate with you?

Would most certainly be a downer, and probalby turn a number of new users away if that was in some of their early experiences.


--Andy
So the best answer to ...

squishyg wrote:

Kotaro wrote:Why should you be allowed to still coordinate with your teammates when you've abused your right to chat?

Which is why my first suggestion was to not allow people banned from chatting into team games.

Yeah that is probably a good compromise.

When i first read the post i saw it not as a punishment for offensive users but as a way of making things better for those offended by them.

Even in team games the auto chat could work it will just have to be less specific that the normal chat a banned play can say stuff like "attack the north east" and " Help me in the west". If possible you could add player names to auto chat so i could be "Attack <player name>" or " <player name> Is ...

Any kind of ratings would be help full.Three rating styles that come to mind are

1)A standard x out of ten or x out of 5 system. Simple and easy

2)A three tier rating system where you rate the same as above just on three different categories Graphics,Game Play and Understandability.(Just like the ...

Not so crazy about brutalsleepers' additional suggestion. The mods are here for a reason. I don't really want the average player deciding who to censor and who not to censor.
I know what your saying i just thought that players can take an active role in securing a fun game for them selves without ...

Brilliant idea
one suggestion though maybe in-game players can vote to ban a certain person from chat inside that game only.This can stop annoying players who hasn't done any thing overly offensive.

If you want something revamped... Do it yourself? You can't MAKE people revamp their maps; they've already worked long and hard to get it done. And besides that, making the map look any better won't distract from the shitty gameplay. If it's not fun, it doesn't matter if it's done by an artist made ...

I want to propose the ability to rate maps after playing on them and for people to see those ratings. This gives three significant advantages.
1.It allows players to check the ratings of maps before committing to playing on them.
2. Cartographers are able to see which maps make the biggest impact on ...

Kotaro wrote:.....
Terrible.

Be nice it's not terrible it's just fundamentally flawed.

I can see where your going but it will take out the risk from a game and will make games predictable.

Nice find.

in my eyes any tactics that could increase a players chance of winning (Nuclear Intimidation, Secret Diplomacy etc.) Are perfectly fair to do.I don't use such tactics but believe anything you can do should be done.But in a case where i was being intimidated it encouraged me to fight on and i came on ...

Im in

Instead of upper and lower how about outer and inner.As upper and lower could be confusing at the bottom and sides of the map.

I have been considering manufacturing my first map but after scanning forums and the like I've decided to leave it to the pros.I want to propose a map consisting of four corners split up by a mountain pass and connecting these 4 sections of the map is one neutral territory with a massive amount of ...

I just want to ask people to create some kind of map that is like AOR because they are my favourite maps
i was thinking we could go bac to the oringinal concepet but we could change the map itself keeping the style the same

A surrender butten that puts foward a vote to other players to see if they mind you leaving or not.
It stops people quiting on there 1st round or when lucks not going there way.
There could also be penalties for surrendering.