That is impressive stuff right there. Congrats Jalijoo.

2016-01-25 11:20:58 - Kschame1: you're so good i cannot believe this is your first time on the site you must have a mutli not that i care

In fairness, if he started from Colonel that would be a respectable achievement. I don't know what his rank was on 30 November though...

Every now and then I find myself refusing to complete a bonus because I don't want the map to look all samey but aside from that no issues.

You will be told that truce breaking is neither cheating nor abusive, and not a breach of the rules.

Simply a matter for you to Rate him accordingly, Foe him if you wish, and move on.

He cares enough about what people think of him to try and say he isn't doing it, but not enough about what people think of him not to do it in the first place...there's a truly tormented individual right there.

I inferred this from quoted posts and then got curious enough to unfoe him momentarily ...

mrswdk wrote:I also find the language apartheid troubling.

Insightful, apposite, interesting, appropriate.

None of these words apply to this post.

owenshooter wrote:

Coler wrote:There are lots of people who arn't straight white males on here who are also not loud and annoying.

wait.. your country code says ireland... *cough*... the black jesus has spoken...-Jésus noir

There are lots of people who arn't straight white males on here who are also not loud and annoying.

Missing still potentially gives a very specific advantage in some mob handed escalating spoils games.

Where a player has reached 5 cards they would be obliged to cash when they take their turn. If they miss then assuming others cash in advance when their turn comes, the value of the cash in will ...

It's such bullshit.I saw thhat noorud whatever his name is guy had gotten himself down to Sergeant or Corporal just at the end of September to set up his run...pathetic.

There have been a couple of C&A cases about him on these points already though.

I see things like that and I just foe.

Comments: if he did it by mistake then he could have said so,
send a pm or something. he did nothing.

I'm not saying you're right and I'm not saying you're wrong, but you did call him a piece of shit in the game chat so maybe he didn't want to talk no more :D

- Except that Ucki's comment came ...

uckuki wrote: Comments: if he did it by mistake then he could have said so,
send a pm or something. he did nothing.

I'm not saying you're right and I'm not saying you're wrong, but you did call him a piece of shit in the game chat so maybe he didn't want to talk no more

If only there was some kind of information contained in an appropriately titled thread to read. Perhaps the thread could be made so that it would always be prominent in the forum...'stuck', if you will.

If like me you killed some time by checking through the named players' games (and there's no reason why you should) it is clear that there is a problem here.

Can I be bothered to post the games you ask ?

No. I'm like the OP like that.

But yeah they really do look like multis.

deliberately targeting ranked players is never fun.

But very much advised. High ranking players target low ranking players as they dont want to lose too many points. Its only fair that the reverse is done.

Proof please? I've never seen a case based on that, but it's much more common for lower ...

An agreement can be tacit or overt.

The question begged is, to what extent to players who have come to an 'understanding' about how they approach their games have an obligation to share that understanding with other players.

I don't have an answer though - I did already say I didn't think the ...

I'm not saying they're not nice guys - I know for a fact that Genghis is.

But it would still suck to join a 3 or 4 player game or whatever with them on a map that they play like this without knowing that they do.

I would agree it might fall short of 'cheating' or 'abuse' though.

I would not be happy to play a singles game with the two of you guys in it, if this is how you operate.

Just because its unspoken between you doesn't make it any less of an agreement.

Getting in a game without knowing of your diplomatic stance to each other would be completely unpleasant.

Saw reported names.

Hovering over the foe button, for the OP.

So bored I read Game Chat.

OP now foed.

0...because I'd assume the site was shutting down.

Indeed, let us be perfectly fair to Thoga14.

He has only previously been reported for secret diplomacy, game throwing, ratings abuse and being seriously abusive to other players, but not for being a multi.


https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=239&t=205458&p=4498260&hilit=Thoga14 ...

I think his actual complaint is not the shitty rating he got from gogglez (which is insignificant in light of the fact that he is rated 4.1 anyway) but that gogglez responded to the shitty rating which he left himself by saying that he was a "reported multi/cheater"...which is not ratings abuse ...

I always thought Flame Wars was a load of small-prick bollox but you were always free to ignore it.

I will play anything (I think we have played together though...drug war map ?)