jajaj a, guess you're right... jaja

sucks that no one looks anything....

usually happens... one more zero wont change the point.. jaja

Would like the opinion of more people about this option...

ja jaja, well... nice idea. I think it would need to show if the game is standard or doubles, triples or cuadruples... there are lots of people that like that kind of games, and maybe they dont join just because they dont see what tipe of game is it. in general I like it...

how often does a change for a 1000 troops happen?? or a 100? I dont know... I'm sure its pretty rare... and you can make comebacks, they actually turn much better...imagine a comeback made from 3 territories to win a continent and screw the ones dominating adjacent continets... setting the ...

yeah... the option of beeing paired with the other types of options would be great...

And not if they can only drop 1/10 of that "big cash".


exactly... so, in escalating games, if someone changes a big set it doesn't mean he's won the game and thats it (can be annoying that this person would only have one territory left or so... and after the change he wins...), unless he has ...

yeah, but its really weird to see that... usually when people start trading set for a large number... they win.

I expect this has already been mentioned, but lets reiterate it just for your benefit kcoenich.

Limiting stack size to 20 per region would make attacking in a basic no thrills map problematic at best, you've done your attacking and conquered a region only to find another 20 stack or two behind it ...

troops would be lost... simple as that. jaja
positive thing about that if you are the guy with only one territory, you can recover... (of course if you have only one territory maybe you deserve to loose) but the point is that you also get a chance of recovery, cause no one could have more armies ...

what if its adjacent forts and if you fort the armies the count will still be over the troops/territ

didnt fully understand.. but I think it would be like this: two options... 1) you can only move the armies to get to the limit and the rest of the armies stay in the original territory. 2) (I ...

In an escalating game, there would get to be a point where, no matter how many places you had, you could not use the entire amount of troops. On Doodle Earth/Luxembourg even if you have all but one place, you only have 17. If the limit is 20, then if you turn in a set for 400, you cannot place all ...

any reasons why it would ruin them???

jajaja... then "yes" cause it would be an option...

if you are maxed out on your territories, you lose any army you have left to deploy... a price you pay for having to few territories... ja ja.

I see a lot of advantages in this gameplay... and I know there's lots of people that doesnt know the advantages cause they've never played it... or they are used to classic gameplay, I think its aplicable to every player and to every map on the site. also would create lots of great quality games...

I'm in...

Europe, SNCN

j ajaja, I dont know how everybody thinks that I'm proposing this as a standard rule... its an OPTION. who ever wants to create a game with this gameplay, excellent. I would only create this tipe of game... cause, for me, its a great gameplay for using the head to win the games, not to get passive ...

still you have to build up armies to win... but you need to build them in more territories and those territories have to be on strategic points to make them more effective...

sooo.... any more ideas??

suggestions about this option of gameplay?? opinions? questions?....

cause you could keep doing traditional reinforcements.... would be like "special" kind of reinforcements

I see it more like passive option for all of the existing ones... you know, like chained (of course only one reinforcement), for unlimited would be like only two flying reinforcements allowed per turn or something... and so on.

Interesting... but you could set like one of that tipe of reinforcement per turn... like unlimited with that option, max 1 time of that specific tipe or something. Equal as chained and adjacent (of course, cause they only allow 1 reinforcement at all, jaja)

risk was invented so that you could have as many troops on a space as you desire.The instructions even states you can take pieces of another color if you run out of your own.

how is risk ever not strategy, unless you have three year old just attacking 2v3... with this, are you encoureging ...

to be honest you make no sense here... you are not arguing that this would restrict strategies but you are saying it makes the game more strategic..... i think you need to go get a dictionary and look up restrict.

yes, the game is more strategic, cause the strategy part of the game takes more ...

I never said putting a lot of troops on one territory isnt fair.... I say that stablishing a limit is absolutely possible and it would create excellent and more challenging and interesting games...
exactly because the game becomes more strategic and those who cant manage troops apropiately will be ...